發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-02-06 00:04

  本文關(guān)鍵詞： 李濟(jì) 中國(guó)考古學(xué) 歷史法 張光直 人類學(xué)研究 青銅文化 殷墟文化 仰韶 考古學(xué)界 考古學(xué)方法 　出處：《考古學(xué)報(bào)》2014年02期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：正目次一中國(guó)人類學(xué)家的可能貢獻(xiàn):語(yǔ)言與比較二作為"比較法"基礎(chǔ)的"歷史法":小范圍與細(xì)節(jié)發(fā)掘三"歷史法"對(duì)"比較法"的單向制約:器物分類有"邏輯"四回應(yīng)批評(píng);討論器物"功能"的路徑五要"準(zhǔn)確"還是要"合理"在李濟(jì)去世后的二十年里,他的學(xué)生張光直通過(guò)檢討現(xiàn)代中國(guó)考古學(xué)發(fā)展史,有力地彰顯了李濟(jì)對(duì)中國(guó)考古學(xué)的貢獻(xiàn),尤其是扭轉(zhuǎn)了大陸考古學(xué)界對(duì)李濟(jì)的忽視。但張光直亦非無(wú)原則地贊譽(yù),他相當(dāng)中肯地提出李濟(jì)在四個(gè)方面的影響~[1],同時(shí)尖銳地指出現(xiàn)代中國(guó)考古學(xué)的歷
[Abstract]:The possible contribution of Chinese anthropologists: language and comparison: "Historical Law" as the basis of "Comparative Law": "small scope and detail excavation" three "Historical Law" on the "Comparative Law" one-way constraints: the classification of objects. Logic "four responses to criticism;" The way to discuss the "function" of objects five is to be "accurate" or "reasonable" in the 20 years since Li Ji's death, Zhang Guangzhi, his student, has reviewed the history of archaeology in modern China. It has demonstrated Li Ji's contribution to Chinese archaeology, especially in reversing the neglect of Li Ji in mainland archaeology circles. But Zhang Guangzhi is not unprincipled praise, he fairly pointed out Li Ji's influence in four aspects ~. [At the same time pointed out acutely the calendar of modern Chinese archaeology
【作者單位】： 四川大學(xué)歷史文化學(xué)院;
【基金】：四川大學(xué)中央高校基本科研業(yè)務(wù)費(fèi)專項(xiàng)項(xiàng)目(SKJC201002)和(SKGT201204)的資助
【分類號(hào)】：K854
，

本文編號(hào)：1493104