本文關(guān)鍵詞： 北方地區(qū) 龍泉青瓷 分期 分布地域 路線　出處：《吉林大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：本文通過對(duì)北方地區(qū)出土龍泉青瓷的收集整理，對(duì)這些瓷器的類型、特征、分期等問題做了較為深入的研究，對(duì)龍泉青瓷在北方地區(qū)的分布地域和使用人群，以及輸入途徑和路線等問題也做了初步的討論。全文共分為四大部分。 第一部分簡(jiǎn)要介紹了北方地區(qū)龍泉青瓷發(fā)現(xiàn)的基本情況，并對(duì)以往的研究狀況做了回顧。 第二部分是對(duì)北方地區(qū)出土龍泉青瓷所做的類型介紹。 第三部分主要敘述了北方地區(qū)出土龍泉青瓷的分期與特征。分為四期：第一期為元代早期，公元1234年～1307年，這一時(shí)期，龍泉青瓷發(fā)現(xiàn)較少，，器型、裝飾也較為單一，伴出瓷器中，景德鎮(zhèn)窯青白瓷器較多，其次為鈞釉瓷器；第二期為元代中晚期，公元1308年～1368年，龍泉青瓷出土數(shù)量大增，器型豐富，大件器物大量出現(xiàn)，裝飾手法多樣，伴出瓷器中，以北方窯場(chǎng)生產(chǎn)的瓷器數(shù)量居多；第三期為明代早中期，公元1368～1521年，數(shù)量巨大，且集中出土于幾個(gè)遺址，器型豐富，裝飾手法以刻劃、模印為主，伴出瓷器中，景德鎮(zhèn)窯瓷器在數(shù)量上占有絕對(duì)優(yōu)勢(shì)；第四期為元代晚期，公元1522～1644年，數(shù)量銳減，器型也不甚豐富，裝飾手法以模印和刻劃為主，伴出瓷器中，景德鎮(zhèn)窯瓷器仍占主流。 第四部分是對(duì)相關(guān)問題的討論。首先是結(jié)合分期結(jié)果對(duì)龍泉青瓷在北方地區(qū)的分布地域及使用人群的分析�？梢钥闯�，北方地區(qū)出土龍泉青瓷的地域是隨時(shí)代而變化的。元代早期除略陽八渡河窖藏外，其余遺址均位于元統(tǒng)治中心區(qū)，中晚期則擴(kuò)展到了北方全境；明代早中期，出土范圍大大縮小，集中在當(dāng)時(shí)的京師地區(qū)；到了明代晚期，地域范圍又有所擴(kuò)張。使用人群方面，除元代早期主要為社會(huì)上層所擁有外，龍泉青瓷的消費(fèi)對(duì)象還是以平民為主。 其次是關(guān)于元、明兩代龍泉青瓷輸入途徑和路線的探討。元代可能存在專門供應(yīng)宮廷的龍泉青瓷，有學(xué)者推測(cè)大多是各地征收或地方官府上貢而來，明代則有明確的窯場(chǎng)按照官府制定的樣式、數(shù)量來燒造。其余龍泉青瓷都是通過貿(mào)易的途徑流入北方地區(qū)的。運(yùn)輸途徑主要是海運(yùn)、水運(yùn)、陸運(yùn)三種方式相結(jié)合。元代龍泉青瓷的北輸應(yīng)當(dāng)是以海運(yùn)和內(nèi)河航運(yùn)為主，輔以陸路運(yùn)輸；明代海運(yùn)主要是政府行為，南方瓷器要進(jìn)入北方市場(chǎng)，應(yīng)當(dāng)是通過運(yùn)河和陸路運(yùn)輸相結(jié)合的方式進(jìn)行的。 另外本文還提出了對(duì)濟(jì)南郎茂山家族墓M1年代的疑問，根據(jù)出土龍泉青瓷碗的特征，認(rèn)為M1年代應(yīng)為1340年，而非1280年。 最后為結(jié)語部分。
[Abstract]:Through the collection and arrangement of Longquan celadon unearthed in northern China, this paper makes a deep study on the types, characteristics and stages of these porcelain, and on the distribution of Longquan celadon in the northern region and the people who use it. The input path and route are also discussed. The paper is divided into four parts. The first part briefly introduces the basic situation of the discovery of Longquan celadon and reviews the previous research situation. The second part introduces the types of Longquan celadon unearthed in the north. The third part mainly narrates the stage and characteristic of Longquan celadon unearthed in northern area. It is divided into four periods: the first period is the early Yuan Dynasty, 1234 to 1307, this period, Longquan celadon found less. In the porcelain, Jingdezhen kiln white porcelain is more, followed by Jun glazed porcelain; The second period is the middle and late Yuan Dynasty, from 1308 to 1368, the number of celadon unearthed in Longquan increased greatly, the type was rich, a large number of large objects appeared, the decoration techniques were various, accompanied by porcelain. The quantity of porcelain produced in northern kilns is the most. The third period is the early Ming Dynasty, AD 1368 to 1521, a large number, and concentrated on several sites, rich in the type, decorative techniques to carve, mold printing, accompanied by porcelain. Jingdezhen kiln porcelain has an absolute advantage in quantity; Period 4th is the late Yuan Dynasty, AD 1522 ~ 1644, the number of sharply reduced, the type is not very rich, decorative techniques to mold printing and engraving, accompanied by porcelain, Jingdezhen kiln porcelain is still the mainstream. The first part is the analysis of the distribution of Longquan celadon in the northern region and the crowd of users combined with the results of the stages. The region of Longquan celadon unearthed in the north changed with the times. In the early Yuan Dynasty, except for the Baduhe cellar in Lueyang, the remaining sites were located in the central area of Yuan Dynasty and extended to the whole territory of the north in the middle and late period. In the early and middle Ming Dynasty, the unearthed area was greatly reduced and concentrated in the area of capital division at that time. In the late Ming Dynasty, the area was also expanded. Besides the upper class of society in the early Yuan Dynasty, the consuming object of Longquan celadon was mainly civilians. The second is about the Yuan, the Ming Longquan celadon input path and route. The Yuan Dynasty may have a special supply court of Longquan celadon, some scholars speculated that most of them were collected from various places or local officials came from the palace. Ming Dynasty has a clear kiln in accordance with the official style, the number of burning. The rest of Longquan celadon are flowing into the northern region through the way of trade. Transport is mainly by sea, water transport. The north transportation of Longquan celadon in Yuan Dynasty should be mainly by sea and inland waterway, supplemented by land transportation. Shipping by sea in Ming Dynasty was mainly a government act. If southern china wants to enter the northern market, it should be carried out through the combination of canal and land transportation. In addition, this paper also raises the question of the M1's tomb of Langmaoshan family in Jinan. According to the characteristics of the celadon bowl unearthed in Longquan, the M1 period should be 1340, not 1280. The last part is the conclusion.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：K876.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陳家本;;雙城縣蘭棱鎮(zhèn)出土一批金代窖藏文物[J];北方文物;1990年01期

2 葉佩蘭;清代“龍泉窯系”青瓷[J];故宮博物院院刊;1982年02期

3 劉法祥;夫余縣明墓發(fā)掘簡(jiǎn)報(bào)[J];黑龍江文物叢刊;1983年03期

4 張方;南陽明代武略將軍墓出土瓷器[J];華夏考古;1998年04期

5 灻文弼;;元阿力麻里古城考[J];考古;1963年10期

6 ;北京后英房元代居住遺址[J];考古;1972年06期

7 ;北京西絳胡同和后桃園的元代居住遺址[J];考古;1973年05期

8 朱金升;;河北磁縣南開河村元代木船發(fā)掘簡(jiǎn)報(bào)[J];考古;1978年06期

9 劉善沂;;山東茌平郗屯出土一批金元器物[J];考古;1986年08期

10 李紅軍;馬云洪;;遼寧義縣出土的一批瓷器[J];考古;1988年02期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 馬健;元代窖藏瓷器的初步研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2007年

2 董杰;中原地區(qū)元墓出土瓷器初步研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2009年

3 趙磊;天津地區(qū)出土瓷器初步研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2010年

4 孟慶利;論中國(guó)北方草原地帶元代的瓷器貿(mào)易[D];內(nèi)蒙古師范大學(xué);2010年

本文編號(hào)：1477003