發(fā)布時間：2018-01-11 05:09

  本文關(guān)鍵詞：謝爾塔拉文化的發(fā)現(xiàn)與初步研究　出處：《鄭州大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 謝爾塔拉文化 西烏珠爾墓地 室韋 呼倫貝爾草原

【摘要】：呼倫貝爾草原位于祖國的東北邊陲,自古以來很多游牧民族如鮮卑、女真、室韋、蒙古等都在這里發(fā)展壯大。謝爾塔拉文化的主體分布范圍在呼倫貝爾草原的海拉爾河流域,代表了公元7-10世紀活動在呼倫貝爾草原的游牧民族文化的遺存。主要發(fā)掘地點有兩處,一處是西烏珠爾墓地,一處是謝爾塔拉墓地,分別代表了謝爾塔拉文化兩個不同的發(fā)展階段。 謝爾塔拉墓地的發(fā)掘填補了相當(dāng)于晚唐五代時期該地區(qū)少數(shù)民族文化遺存的空白。該墓地的文化內(nèi)涵與鮮卑、契丹文化之間存在明顯區(qū)別,但這批墓葬的年代和歷史文獻記載中該地區(qū)同時期的、構(gòu)成蒙古族族源的室韋人相當(dāng)吻合。本人以大量文獻資料研究為基礎(chǔ),探討謝爾塔拉的族屬,如果謝爾塔拉墓地的族屬能夠推斷為室韋,那么對確定室韋的物質(zhì)文化面貌,進而探討蒙古族的起源問題能夠提供新的線索。 唐代渤海國文化與謝爾塔拉文化大致處于同一時期,兩者在葬俗以及墓葬形制和隨葬品方面有較多的共同文化因素,同時也保持著自身的特殊性。人類學(xué)研究從謝爾塔拉人群的顱、面類型上推斷他們屬于蒙古人種北亞類型。謝爾塔拉文化的發(fā)現(xiàn),為研究室韋的歷史以及探索蒙古族的起源提供了科學(xué)的考古實證資料,對于構(gòu)建呼倫貝爾草原古代游牧民族考古學(xué)文化體系,推動中國東北邊疆地區(qū)考古與歷史研究均具有重要意義。 本文將結(jié)合新的考古發(fā)掘資料和研究成果,首先對代表謝爾塔拉文化的墓葬進行系統(tǒng)的梳理,對墓葬形制、主要隨葬品進行類型學(xué)研究；其次,分四個方面對謝爾塔拉文化進行初步研究。第一是謝爾塔拉文化與唐代渤海國的比較。第二是引用大量文獻資料研究謝爾塔拉文化的族屬以及當(dāng)時的社會組織關(guān)系。第三是結(jié)合漢代鮮卑考古發(fā)掘資料,通過文化因素,探討謝爾塔拉文化與鮮卑文化相互間的文化傳承與發(fā)展關(guān)系。最后對謝爾塔拉文化的樺樹皮器進行分類和相關(guān)初步研究。
[Abstract]:Hulunbeir grassland is located in the northeast border of the motherland, since ancient times many nomads such as Xianbei, Nu Zhen, Virway. Mongolia and so on are growing here. The main distribution of Shertara culture is in the Hulunbeir grassland of the Hyalar River basin. It represents the remains of the nomadic culture of the Hulunbeir grassland in the 7th and 10th centuries. There are two main sites to be excavated, one is the Xiuzhu cemetery, the other is the Sheertara cemetery. It represents two different stages of development of Shertara culture. The excavation of Sheertara Cemetery fills the gap which is equivalent to the cultural relics of the ethnic minorities in the late Tang and five dynasties. The cultural connotation of the cemetery and Xianbei, Qidan culture are obviously different. But the ages and historical records of these tombs in the same period in this area, the Mongol origin of the Virway people are quite consistent. Based on a large number of literature research, I discuss the family of Shertara. If the genus of Seltara graveyard can be inferred as Virvir, it can provide a new clue to determine the physical and cultural features of Virgo and to explore the origin of Mongolian. The culture of Bohai in Tang Dynasty and the culture of Shertara were roughly in the same period, both of them had more common cultural factors in the burial customs, the form of tombs and the burial objects. At the same time, it also maintains its own particularity. Anthropological studies infer from the cranial and facial types of the Shertara population that they belong to the Mongolian North Asian type and the discovery of Shertara culture. In order to study the history of Virway and explore the origin of Mongolian provide scientific archaeological empirical data for the construction of Hulunbeir grassland ancient nomadic archaeological cultural system. It is of great significance to promote the archaeological and historical research in the northeast border area of China. This article will combine the new archaeological excavation data and the research result, first carries on the systematic comb to represent the Shertara culture tombs, to the tombs shape system, the main burial object carries on the typology research; Second. The first is the comparison between Shertara culture and the Bohai state in the Tang Dynasty. The second is the study of the ethnic affiliation of the Shertara culture and the social organization at that time by citing a large amount of literature. The third is the combination of the Han Dynasty Xianbei archaeological excavations. Through cultural factors, this paper discusses the cultural inheritance and development relationship between Shertara culture and Xianbei culture. Finally, the author classifies the birch bark of Shertara culture and makes a preliminary study on it.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：鄭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：K872

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 孫進己;室韋的起源[J];求是學(xué)刊;1985年01期

2 米文平;;鮮卑石室的發(fā)現(xiàn)與初步研究[J];文物;1981年02期

3 趙展;;對蒙古族起源于“蒙兀室韋”說的質(zhì)疑[J];學(xué)習(xí)與探索;1982年02期

4 劉光勝;鄭英德;;試論室韋諸部都是蒙古族源[J];中南民族學(xué)院學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);1983年02期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 殷煥良;中國古代北方民族樺樹皮文化研究[D];內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號：1408220