孟加拉國本地政府官員與官僚在團(tuán)隊(duì)合作效率方面的互補(bǔ)關(guān)系：多利益相關(guān)者視角
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2024-02-24 12:06
本研究僅關(guān)注Upazila Parishad(UZP)團(tuán)隊(duì),該團(tuán)隊(duì)被稱為孟加拉農(nóng)村地方政府的中層政府。1982年以前,地方政府被由英國人繼承的官僚長期控制;1982年引入U(xiǎn)ZP系統(tǒng)后,地方政府的權(quán)威轉(zhuǎn)向了政治家,但是由于政府的不情愿和官僚之間缺乏合作,UZP系統(tǒng)沒有繼續(xù)下去。在長期缺席之后,UZP現(xiàn)在在492 Upazila的民選領(lǐng)導(dǎo)下運(yùn)作。根據(jù)UZP法案,Upazila Nirbahi官員(UNO)是孟加拉國公務(wù)員管理局干部的官員,他被指定為UZP的首席執(zhí)行官(PE0),而UNO的職責(zé)包括確保遵守規(guī)則和條例并維持財(cái)務(wù)紀(jì)律。根據(jù)1998年UZP法案(2009年和2011年修訂),UZP主席(UZPC)擁有監(jiān)督所有被調(diào)動人員的法定權(quán)力,移轉(zhuǎn)部門的官員也要對UZPC負(fù)責(zé),同時(shí),地方官僚也必須對其上級部門負(fù)責(zé)。經(jīng)過大量的實(shí)踐,UZP系統(tǒng)自2009年以來一直由其選舉產(chǎn)生的機(jī)構(gòu)負(fù)責(zé)管理。但是地方官僚并不準(zhǔn)備接受這種權(quán)威,因?yàn)榈胤矫襁x政治家試圖對地方官僚行使過多的政治權(quán)力,最終導(dǎo)致他們之間的沖突。為了緩和兩者之間的矛盾,政府也制定了一項(xiàng)規(guī)則,即在2015年以黨派關(guān)系的形式舉行地方政府選舉,但根據(jù)U...
【文章頁數(shù)】：244 頁
【學(xué)位級別】：博士
【文章目錄】：
摘要
ABSTRACT
Abbreviation
Chapter 1 Introduction and Background of the Study
1.1 Statement of the Issue
1.2 Political Experimentation over Local Government in Bangladesh
1.2.1 Pre-British Era
1.2.2 British Era
1.2.3 Pakistan Era
1.2.4 Bangladesh Era
1.3 Historical Development of Field Administration in Bangladesh
1.3.1 The British Period (1600-1947)
1.3.2 The Pakistan Period (1947-1971)
1.3.3 The Bangladesh Period (1971-2019)
1.4 Local Administration Team of Bangladesh
1.4.1 Politicians
1.4.2 Bureaucrats
1.5 Nature and Scope of the UZP Team Performances
1.6 Scope of the Study
1.7 Objectives and Research Questions of the Study
1.8 Structure of the Dissertation
Chapter 2 Literature Review
2.1 Politics-Bureaucracy Interface
2.1.1 Politics-Administration Dichotomy(1887)
2.1.2 Mutual-Interactive Model of Relationship(1970s)
2.1.3 The Adversarial Model(1987)
2.1.4 Complementarity Model (1998)
2.2 Findings through Previous Literatures
2.3 Significance of the Study
Chapter 3 Theoretical Background and Conceptualization
3.1 Theoretical Framework
3.1.1 Tuckman's Stages of Team Development(1965)
3.1.2 Beckhard's GRPI Model of Team Effectiveness(1972)
3.1.3 Lencioni's Team Dysfunctional Model (2002)
3.2 Conceptualization of the Study Variables
3.2.1 Role Ambiguity
3.2.2 Mutual Dependence
3.2.3 Role Conflict
3.2.4 Mutual Trust
3.2.5 Organizational Commitment
3.2.6 Procedural Justice
3.2.7 Team Effectiveness
3.2.8 Legislation and Policies
3.2.9 Education
Chapter 4 Methodology
4.1 Philosophical Standpoints of the Study
4.1.1 Ontological Perspective
4.1.2 Epistemological Perspective
4.1.3 Explanatory Inference
4.1.4 Deductive Approach
4.1.5 Research Design- Logic of Selecting Triangulation Approach
4.2 Determination of Sample Size
4.2.1 Politicians and Bureaucrats Perspective
4.2.2 Citizen's Perspective
4.3 Data Collection Methods
4.3.1 Structured Questionnaire for Quantitative Field Survey
4.3.2 Semi-structured Questionnaire for Qualitative Interview
4.4 Data Analyzing Methods
4.4.1 Quantitative Data Analyzing through PLS-SEM
4.4.2 Qualitative Data Analyzing through Data Analysis Spiral
4.5 Validity and Reliability
4.5.1 Validity and Reliability for Quantitative Survey
4.5.2 Validity and Reliability for Qualitative Survey
Chapter 5 Politico-Bureaucratic Relationships towards TeamEffectiveness: Politicians and Bureaucrats Perspectives
5.1 Demographic Features of the Sample Respondents
5.2 Results of Quantitative Data Analysis
5.3 Measurement Model
5.3.1 Convergent Validity
5.3.2 Indicator Reliability
5.3.3 Discriminant Validity
5.4 Structural Model
5.4.1 Multicollinearity Assessment of Structural Model
5.4.2 Path Co-efficient and T-statistics Value
5.4.3 Measuring the Value of R2
5.4.4 Effect Size f
5.4.5 Model's Predictive Relevance (Q2)
5.4.6 Assessment of Fit
5.5 Moderating Effects
5.5.1 Path Co-efficient Results with Total Effects
5.5.2 Measuring the Value of R2 and Effect Size f2 with Moderating Effects
5.5.3 Model's Predictive Relevance (Q2) with Moderating Effects
5.5.4 Model Fit with Moderating Effects
5.5.5 Simple Slope Plot Analysis
Chapter 6 Politico-Bureaucratic Relationships towards TeamEffectiveness: Citizen's Perspectives
6.1 Demographic Features of the Respondents
6.2 Results of Qualitative Data Analysis
6.2.1 Relationships between Politicians and Bureaucrats
6.2.2 Factors Associated with Conflicts between Politicians and Bureaucrats
6.2.3 Role of MP over the UZP under UZP Amendment Act 2009&2011
6.2.4 Issues that Associated with Conflicts between MP and UZPC
6.2.5 Role of Less-Educated Team Members on UZP Performances
6.2.6 Role of Partisan Elected Politicians at the UZP
6.2.7 Partisan Elected Leader's Role in Team Effectiveness
6.2.8 More Conflicting Pairs of Relationships at the UZP
6.2.9 Citizen's Recommendations towards Team Effectiveness at the UZP
Chapter 7 Discussion and Conclusion
7.1 Introduction
7.2 Summary of the Findings
7.2.1 Politicians and Bureaucrats Perspectives
7.2.2 Citizen's Perspective
7.3 Theoretical Contributions
7.4 Practical Contributions
7.4.1 Role Ambiguity and Team Effectiveness
7.4.2 Mutual Dependence and Team Effectiveness
7.4.3 Role Conflict and Team Effectiveness
7.4.4 Mutual Trust and Team Effectiveness
7.4.5 Organizational Commitment and Team Effectiveness
7.4.6 Procedural Justice and Team effectiveness
7.4.7 Role of Legislation and Policies as Moderator
7.4.8 Role of Education as Moderator
7.5 Limitations and Future Research
7.6 Conclusions and Policy Recommendations
References
Appendix
Appendix 1: Survey Questionnaire for the politicians & the bureaucrats
Appendix 2: Interview Questionnaire for the Citizen
Appendix 3: Functions of Upazila Parishad
Appendix 4: Revenue Sources of Upazila Parishad
Appendix 5: Name of the standing committee of Upazila Parishad
Appendix 6: Functions of Upazila Nirbahi Officer (UNO)
Appendix 7: Criterion for block grant allocation in sector wise
Acknowledgement
Academic Articles and Research Outcomes in Study Period
本文編號：3908967
【文章頁數(shù)】：244 頁
【學(xué)位級別】：博士
【文章目錄】：
摘要
ABSTRACT
Abbreviation
Chapter 1 Introduction and Background of the Study
1.1 Statement of the Issue
1.2 Political Experimentation over Local Government in Bangladesh
1.2.1 Pre-British Era
1.2.2 British Era
1.2.3 Pakistan Era
1.2.4 Bangladesh Era
1.3 Historical Development of Field Administration in Bangladesh
1.3.1 The British Period (1600-1947)
1.3.2 The Pakistan Period (1947-1971)
1.3.3 The Bangladesh Period (1971-2019)
1.4 Local Administration Team of Bangladesh
1.4.1 Politicians
1.4.2 Bureaucrats
1.5 Nature and Scope of the UZP Team Performances
1.6 Scope of the Study
1.7 Objectives and Research Questions of the Study
1.8 Structure of the Dissertation
Chapter 2 Literature Review
2.1 Politics-Bureaucracy Interface
2.1.1 Politics-Administration Dichotomy(1887)
2.1.2 Mutual-Interactive Model of Relationship(1970s)
2.1.3 The Adversarial Model(1987)
2.1.4 Complementarity Model (1998)
2.2 Findings through Previous Literatures
2.3 Significance of the Study
Chapter 3 Theoretical Background and Conceptualization
3.1 Theoretical Framework
3.1.1 Tuckman's Stages of Team Development(1965)
3.1.2 Beckhard's GRPI Model of Team Effectiveness(1972)
3.1.3 Lencioni's Team Dysfunctional Model (2002)
3.2 Conceptualization of the Study Variables
3.2.1 Role Ambiguity
3.2.2 Mutual Dependence
3.2.3 Role Conflict
3.2.4 Mutual Trust
3.2.5 Organizational Commitment
3.2.6 Procedural Justice
3.2.7 Team Effectiveness
3.2.8 Legislation and Policies
3.2.9 Education
Chapter 4 Methodology
4.1 Philosophical Standpoints of the Study
4.1.1 Ontological Perspective
4.1.2 Epistemological Perspective
4.1.3 Explanatory Inference
4.1.4 Deductive Approach
4.1.5 Research Design- Logic of Selecting Triangulation Approach
4.2 Determination of Sample Size
4.2.1 Politicians and Bureaucrats Perspective
4.2.2 Citizen's Perspective
4.3 Data Collection Methods
4.3.1 Structured Questionnaire for Quantitative Field Survey
4.3.2 Semi-structured Questionnaire for Qualitative Interview
4.4 Data Analyzing Methods
4.4.1 Quantitative Data Analyzing through PLS-SEM
4.4.2 Qualitative Data Analyzing through Data Analysis Spiral
4.5 Validity and Reliability
4.5.1 Validity and Reliability for Quantitative Survey
4.5.2 Validity and Reliability for Qualitative Survey
Chapter 5 Politico-Bureaucratic Relationships towards TeamEffectiveness: Politicians and Bureaucrats Perspectives
5.1 Demographic Features of the Sample Respondents
5.2 Results of Quantitative Data Analysis
5.3 Measurement Model
5.3.1 Convergent Validity
5.3.2 Indicator Reliability
5.3.3 Discriminant Validity
5.4 Structural Model
5.4.1 Multicollinearity Assessment of Structural Model
5.4.2 Path Co-efficient and T-statistics Value
5.4.3 Measuring the Value of R2
5.4.5 Model's Predictive Relevance (Q2)
5.4.6 Assessment of Fit
5.5 Moderating Effects
5.5.1 Path Co-efficient Results with Total Effects
5.5.2 Measuring the Value of R2 and Effect Size f2 with Moderating Effects
5.5.3 Model's Predictive Relevance (Q2) with Moderating Effects
5.5.4 Model Fit with Moderating Effects
5.5.5 Simple Slope Plot Analysis
Chapter 6 Politico-Bureaucratic Relationships towards TeamEffectiveness: Citizen's Perspectives
6.1 Demographic Features of the Respondents
6.2 Results of Qualitative Data Analysis
6.2.1 Relationships between Politicians and Bureaucrats
6.2.2 Factors Associated with Conflicts between Politicians and Bureaucrats
6.2.3 Role of MP over the UZP under UZP Amendment Act 2009&2011
6.2.4 Issues that Associated with Conflicts between MP and UZPC
6.2.5 Role of Less-Educated Team Members on UZP Performances
6.2.6 Role of Partisan Elected Politicians at the UZP
6.2.7 Partisan Elected Leader's Role in Team Effectiveness
6.2.8 More Conflicting Pairs of Relationships at the UZP
6.2.9 Citizen's Recommendations towards Team Effectiveness at the UZP
Chapter 7 Discussion and Conclusion
7.1 Introduction
7.2 Summary of the Findings
7.2.1 Politicians and Bureaucrats Perspectives
7.2.2 Citizen's Perspective
7.3 Theoretical Contributions
7.4 Practical Contributions
7.4.1 Role Ambiguity and Team Effectiveness
7.4.2 Mutual Dependence and Team Effectiveness
7.4.3 Role Conflict and Team Effectiveness
7.4.4 Mutual Trust and Team Effectiveness
7.4.5 Organizational Commitment and Team Effectiveness
7.4.6 Procedural Justice and Team effectiveness
7.4.7 Role of Legislation and Policies as Moderator
7.4.8 Role of Education as Moderator
7.5 Limitations and Future Research
7.6 Conclusions and Policy Recommendations
References
Appendix
Appendix 1: Survey Questionnaire for the politicians & the bureaucrats
Appendix 2: Interview Questionnaire for the Citizen
Appendix 3: Functions of Upazila Parishad
Appendix 4: Revenue Sources of Upazila Parishad
Appendix 5: Name of the standing committee of Upazila Parishad
Appendix 6: Functions of Upazila Nirbahi Officer (UNO)
Appendix 7: Criterion for block grant allocation in sector wise
Acknowledgement
Academic Articles and Research Outcomes in Study Period
本文編號：3908967
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/guojizhengzhilunwen/3908967.html
最近更新
教材專著
