【摘要】： 在東南亞地區(qū),隨著柬埔寨問(wèn)題的解決,東帝汶問(wèn)題就成為該地區(qū)最主要的安全問(wèn)題之一。東帝汶問(wèn)題自1974年印尼入侵東帝汶產(chǎn)生以來(lái)一直是地區(qū)熱點(diǎn)之一。東帝汶獨(dú)立過(guò)程的特殊性還在于:其一,獨(dú)立過(guò)程異常漫長(zhǎng)從1974年算起一直到2002年才最終實(shí)現(xiàn)獨(dú)立;其二,獨(dú)立的代價(jià)非常大,從爭(zhēng)取獨(dú)立的1974年開(kāi)始,大量的東帝汶人非正常死亡,甚至高達(dá)總?cè)丝诘?/4;其三,東帝汶獨(dú)立過(guò)程是在冷戰(zhàn)結(jié)束之后才開(kāi)始啟動(dòng)的,這是冷戰(zhàn)后為數(shù)很少的新獨(dú)立國(guó)家,在其獨(dú)立過(guò)程中外部大國(guó)特別是澳大利亞發(fā)揮了特殊的作用。本文就試圖對(duì)這個(gè)小國(guó)獨(dú)立的過(guò)程進(jìn)行分析,對(duì)外部大國(guó)澳大利亞所發(fā)揮的作用進(jìn)行探析。 本文的目的是對(duì)東帝汶獨(dú)立的過(guò)程進(jìn)行梳理,探討東帝汶獨(dú)立過(guò)程中澳大利亞和印尼的關(guān)系,找出澳大利亞在東帝汶獨(dú)立過(guò)程中所發(fā)揮的作用。所以本文分以下幾部分來(lái)組織論文:導(dǎo)論部分對(duì)國(guó)內(nèi)外研究現(xiàn)狀作了回顧,并提出了本文的變量和假設(shè),介紹了本文所采用的分析方法;第一章對(duì)東帝汶問(wèn)題的由來(lái)做了分析;第二章對(duì)冷戰(zhàn)后澳大利亞對(duì)東帝汶政策的演變做了分析,重點(diǎn)分析了工黨政府和霍華德聯(lián)合政府對(duì)東帝汶政策的變化;第三章是本文的重點(diǎn),分析澳大利亞對(duì)東帝汶政策形成和轉(zhuǎn)變的原因,運(yùn)用層次分析法對(duì)各種原因條分縷析;第四章根據(jù)上文的分析概括出澳大利亞對(duì)東帝汶獨(dú)立的影響;最后在結(jié)論部分,筆者力圖通過(guò)上文個(gè)案的分析來(lái)揭示出兩個(gè)問(wèn)題:中等強(qiáng)國(guó)的外交邏輯和冷戰(zhàn)后小國(guó)的獨(dú)立之路。 本文的重點(diǎn)在于第三章和第四章的分析,通過(guò)分析本文認(rèn)為,澳大利亞在東帝汶獨(dú)立過(guò)程中發(fā)揮了:東帝汶問(wèn)題的“透視鏡”、東帝汶獨(dú)立進(jìn)程的“啟動(dòng)者”、聯(lián)合國(guó)駐東帝汶機(jī)構(gòu)的關(guān)鍵支持者和東帝汶重建的“幫助者”四種角色的作用。
[Abstract]:In Southeast Asia, with the settlement of Cambodia, East Timor has become one of the most important security problems in the region. The question of East Timor has been one of the regional hotspots since the Indonesian invasion of East Timor in 1974. The particularity of the independence process of East Timor lies in the following aspects: first, the independence process was unusually long from 1974 to 2002; Second, the cost of independence is very high. Since 1974, when independence was won, a large number of East Timorese have died unnaturally, even as high as a quarter of the total population. Thirdly, the process of independence of East Timor began only after the end of the cold war, a small number of newly independent States after the cold war, in which the outside Powers, particularly Australia, played a special role. This paper attempts to analyze the process of independence of this small country and the role played by Australia. The purpose of this paper is to sort out the process of East Timor's independence, to explore the relationship between Australia and Indonesia in the process of East Timor's independence, and to find out the role played by Australia in the process of East Timor's independence. So this paper is divided into the following parts to organize the paper: the introduction part reviews the domestic and foreign research status, and puts forward the variables and hypotheses of this paper, introduces the analytical methods adopted in this paper, the first chapter makes an analysis of the origin of the East Timor problem; The second chapter analyzes the evolution of Australia's policy towards East Timor after the Cold War, focusing on the changes in the policy of the Labor Government and Howard's coalition government on East Timor. The third chapter is the focus of this paper, analyzes the reasons for the formation and transformation of Australia's policy towards East Timor, analyzes the causes by AHP, and summarizes Australia's influence on the independence of East Timor according to the above analysis. Finally, in the conclusion part, the author tries to reveal two problems through the analysis of the above cases: the diplomatic logic of the middle power and the road of independence of the small country after the cold war. This paper focuses on the analysis of chapters 3 and 4. It is concluded that Australia has played a role in the process of East Timor independence: the "mirror" of East Timor, the "initiator" of East Timor's independence process. The role of key supporters of the United Nations presence in East Timor and the role of the "helper" of East Timor's reconstruction.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：暨南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2008
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D734.6

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 ;吳邦國(guó)委員長(zhǎng)訪問(wèn)新加坡、澳大利亞、新西蘭和馬來(lái)西亞情況的書(shū)面報(bào)告[J];中華人民共和國(guó)全國(guó)人民代表大會(huì)常務(wù)委員會(huì)公報(bào);2005年05期

2 張秋生;二戰(zhàn)以來(lái)澳大利亞對(duì)亞洲政策的演變[J];當(dāng)代亞太;1996年03期

3 劉樊德;澳大利亞為何得以領(lǐng)軍多國(guó)部隊(duì)進(jìn)駐東帝汶?[J];當(dāng)代亞太;1999年11期

4 劉新生;走向獨(dú)立的東帝汶[J];當(dāng)代亞太;2000年04期

5 曉雅;東帝汶主要政治人物[J];當(dāng)代亞太;2000年04期

6 張位均;東帝汶獨(dú)立問(wèn)題浮出水面[J];當(dāng)代亞太;1999年04期

7 鐘合;穿上新衣的東帝汶[J];東南亞縱橫;2001年04期

8 石謀旺;新生的國(guó)家 發(fā)展的處女地——初進(jìn)東帝汶[J];東南亞縱橫;2002年05期

9 李開(kāi)盛,周琦;中國(guó)與東帝汶關(guān)系的歷史、現(xiàn)狀及前景[J];東南亞縱橫;2004年02期

10 黃昆章;澳大利亞對(duì)東南亞的研究[J];東南亞研究資料;1983年03期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 張鵬;從東帝汶問(wèn)題的歷史演變看澳大利亞的“南太平洋主義”[D];外交學(xué)院;2001年

，

本文編號(hào)：2321027