【摘要】： 歐盟地區(qū)政策是歐盟政策體系中的一項(xiàng)重要政策。對(duì)該政策的研究，是深入理解和把握歐洲一體化的困境與未來(lái)的重要切入口。本文對(duì)歐盟地區(qū)政策的研究主要從兩個(gè)大的方面展開(kāi)：改革與效應(yīng)。 隨著歐盟(歐共體)的不斷擴(kuò)大以及全球化過(guò)程中國(guó)際競(jìng)爭(zhēng)的加劇，從20世紀(jì)70年代初步建立開(kāi)始，歐盟地區(qū)政策先后經(jīng)歷了1988年、1999年、2004-2006年等多次重要改革，并逐步確立起完善成熟的政策體系。歐盟地區(qū)政策改革呈現(xiàn)出幾個(gè)重要特點(diǎn)和趨勢(shì)：“凝聚力”與“競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力”雙重目標(biāo)強(qiáng)化趨勢(shì)；程序的不斷簡(jiǎn)化；歐盟、國(guó)家、地區(qū)等不同層級(jí)間“合作”不斷加強(qiáng)，各自職權(quán)也進(jìn)一步明晰，等等。 歐盟地區(qū)政策的“效應(yīng)”研究主要分為三個(gè)緯度：一是經(jīng)濟(jì)與社會(huì)效應(yīng)，二是地域和空間效應(yīng)，三是制度效應(yīng)。從經(jīng)濟(jì)、社會(huì)和地域效應(yīng)看，歐盟機(jī)構(gòu)本身對(duì)歐盟地區(qū)政策的評(píng)估，以及經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)家借用新古典經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)、內(nèi)生經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)理論、新地理經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)等理論方法的評(píng)估，都沒(méi)有得出足夠樂(lè)觀(guān)的結(jié)論。其中需要強(qiáng)調(diào)的是，歐盟地區(qū)政策效應(yīng)評(píng)估過(guò)程中呈現(xiàn)出越來(lái)越明顯的“地域化”和“空間化”趨勢(shì)，，這一趨勢(shì)也同樣反映在歐盟建設(shè)整個(gè)過(guò)程中�？傮w而言，人們普遍認(rèn)為歐盟國(guó)家間的差距得到了一定程度的縮小，而國(guó)家內(nèi)部地區(qū)間差距卻在不斷擴(kuò)大。但我們并不能因此就完全否定歐盟地區(qū)政策的功效。因?yàn)槿绻麤](méi)有這一政策，歐盟地區(qū)差距或許會(huì)更加嚴(yán)峻。 此外，歐盟地區(qū)政策的“制度效應(yīng)”主要表現(xiàn)在歐盟推動(dòng)下的成員國(guó)“地區(qū)化”進(jìn)程中。以波蘭為例的中東歐國(guó)家“地區(qū)化”進(jìn)程的“失敗”，說(shuō)明沒(méi)有統(tǒng)一的“歐洲化”的“模板”，歐盟應(yīng)該盡可能的尊重各國(guó)的“多樣性”，實(shí)現(xiàn)“多樣性中的統(tǒng)一”(Unie dans la diversit(?))。與此同時(shí)，歐洲“地區(qū)化”進(jìn)程所遭遇的困難也讓我們思考“地區(qū)”層級(jí)的相對(duì)地位問(wèn)題，而“多層級(jí)治理”的模式關(guān)注不同等級(jí)之間資源的共享而非競(jìng)爭(zhēng)，能夠?qū)Υ俗龀鲚^為合理的詮釋。 最后，歐盟地區(qū)政策對(duì)中國(guó)地區(qū)發(fā)展有著一定的“啟發(fā)性思考”和“可能性借鑒”：兼顧公平與效率，簡(jiǎn)化程序，加強(qiáng)各層級(jí)合作，通過(guò)“分權(quán)化”使職權(quán)明晰，加強(qiáng)監(jiān)管，改變法律和制度“缺位”等等。
[Abstract]:EU regional policy is an important policy in EU policy system. The study of this policy is an important way to understand and grasp the dilemma of European integration and the future. The research of EU regional policy is mainly carried out from two aspects: reform and effect. With the continuous expansion of the European Union (EC) and the intensification of international competition in the process of globalization, since the initial establishment of the 1970s, the regional policy of the EU has undergone many important reforms such as 1988, 1999, 2004-2006 and so on. And gradually establish a mature policy system. There are several important features and trends in the policy reform of the European Union: "cohesion" and "competitiveness" are the dual objectives of strengthening the trend, the process of continuous simplification; European Union, national, regional and other levels of cooperation between the strengthening, their respective powers and responsibilities, and so on. The study on the "effect" of EU regional policy is divided into three latitudes: one is economic and social effect, the other is regional and spatial effect, and the third is institutional effect. From the point of view of economic, social and regional effects, the EU institutions themselves evaluate the EU regional policy, and economists use neoclassical economics, endogenous economic growth theory, new geographical economics and other theoretical methods to evaluate, They have not come to a conclusion that is optimistic enough. It should be emphasized that there are more and more obvious trends of "regionalization" and "spatialization" in the process of assessing the effect of EU regional policy, which is also reflected in the whole process of EU construction. Generally speaking, it is generally believed that the gap between EU countries has been narrowed to a certain extent, while the gap between regions within the EU is widening. But we cannot deny the effectiveness of the EU's regional policy altogether. Without such a policy, regional disparities in the EU might be even more acute. In addition, the "institutional effect" of the EU's regional policy is mainly reflected in the process of "regionalization" promoted by the EU. Taking Poland as an example, the "failure" of the process of "regionalization" in the countries of Central and Eastern Europe shows that without a unified "template" of "Europeanization", the EU should do its utmost to respect the "diversity" of each country. Implementing "Unity in Diversity" (Unie dans la diversit (?). At the same time, the difficulties in the process of "regionalization" in Europe make us think about the relative status of the "regional" level, while the "multi-level governance" model focuses on the sharing of resources between different levels rather than on competition. To be able to make a more reasonable interpretation of this. Finally, the European Union's regional policy has a certain "enlightening thinking" and "possible reference" to China's regional development: taking equity and efficiency into account, simplifying procedures, strengthening cooperation at all levels, clarifying powers and powers through "decentralization", and strengthening supervision and control. Change the law and system of "vacancy" and so on.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2009
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D75

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 臧術(shù)美;;歐盟地區(qū)政策的經(jīng)濟(jì)、社會(huì)與地域效應(yīng)研究[J];德國(guó)研究;2011年03期

2 朱貴昌;;試析歐盟地區(qū)政策的伙伴關(guān)系原則[J];國(guó)際論壇;2011年05期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 馬勇;歐盟科技一體化研究[D];華東師范大學(xué);2011年

本文編號(hào)：2317769