本文選題：瑞典 + 反腐敗�。� 參考：《河北師范大學(xué)》2010年碩士論文

【摘要】： 腐敗是人類社會政治、經(jīng)濟、文化、生活的威脅。腐敗在政治領(lǐng)域、司法領(lǐng)域、市場經(jīng)濟領(lǐng)域、醫(yī)藥衛(wèi)生領(lǐng)域、文化教育領(lǐng)域等多個領(lǐng)域發(fā)生。腐敗破壞政治、經(jīng)濟的正常發(fā)展和運行、還會危害社會和諧、毀壞公共信譽、影響社會公正和正義,腐敗已經(jīng)發(fā)展成為一種全球性問題,日益被國際社會和世界各國所關(guān)注。 現(xiàn)代社會,無論是西方還是東方,無論是發(fā)展中國家還是發(fā)達國家,沒有任何一個國家和地區(qū)能完全杜絕腐敗、貪污受賄、錢權(quán)交易、徇私枉法等問題,這些腐敗問題的存在,嚴重影響各個國家和地區(qū)的廉政建設(shè)和廉政文化建設(shè)。 反腐倡廉是否成功,能夠關(guān)系到一個的國家政治、經(jīng)濟的發(fā)展和存亡,關(guān)系到全社會大眾生活的各個層面,反腐倡廉同樣也影響著整個社會的和諧和穩(wěn)定。因此,積極防止腐敗搞好廉政文化建設(shè),己經(jīng)是世界各國面臨的一個共同任務(wù)。許多國家的政府部門、社會組織、部門機構(gòu)等都密切關(guān)注反腐敗并積極進行社會廉政文化建設(shè),積極應(yīng)對各種問題并采取各種措施解決腐敗問題,某些國家和地區(qū)在共建社會廉政文化中也已經(jīng)取得了明顯成效。 世界各國在建設(shè)廉政文化方面取得明顯成效的國家有:亞洲的新加坡、香港,歐洲的芬蘭、瑞典等。世界各國的政治、經(jīng)濟、社會制度不同,社會生活中所遇到的具體問題和情況也就不完全相同。各國反腐倡廉有其特殊性,中國在借鑒瑞典廉政文化建設(shè)經(jīng)驗時要有的放矢,批判的借鑒和吸收。我國在進行廉政文化建設(shè)的過程中要不斷補充各項好的方法政策和建議,以期不斷改革和推進我國的廉政文化建設(shè)工作。 瑞典是北歐最大的國家,瑞典世界一流的福利令世人矚目,同時,瑞典的廉政文化建設(shè)成果也值得世界各國學(xué)習(xí)和借鑒。瑞典是世界上最廉潔的國家之一,瑞典貪污腐敗率低,監(jiān)督體系完善,市場經(jīng)濟高度發(fā)展,行政執(zhí)政效能較高,廉政文化建設(shè)體系完整�？偨Y(jié)及借鑒瑞典廉政文化建設(shè)經(jīng)驗對促進我國的廉政文化建設(shè)有一定的促進作用。 本文主要從四方面對瑞典的廉政文化進行了綜合分析。全文共分四部分:第一部分介紹了與廉政文化建設(shè)相關(guān)的一些概念的界定即文化、廉政和廉政文化等。第二部分從宏觀上對瑞典廉政文化建設(shè)的成效進行了概括。第三部分論述了瑞典廉政文化建設(shè)內(nèi)容和瑞典廉政文化建設(shè)的成因,在瑞典廉政文化建設(shè)的成因部分通過影響瑞典的廉政文化的意識形態(tài)傳統(tǒng)、瑞典的法律思想和瑞典的廉政制度三個方面來談。第四部分介紹的是瑞典廉政文化建設(shè)經(jīng)驗對我國的啟示。 在日益全球化的今天,對與中國,我們有研究和學(xué)習(xí)其他國家的廉政文化建設(shè)經(jīng)驗的必要,在本文中我們所擷取的北歐國家瑞典的廉政文化的建設(shè)經(jīng)驗對于我國的廉政文化建設(shè)具有一定的理論意義和現(xiàn)實意義。
[Abstract]:Corruption is a threat to human society, politics, economy, culture and life. Corruption occurs in the fields of politics, justice, market economy, medicine and health, culture and education. Corruption undermines the normal development and operation of politics and economy, and will harm social harmony, destroy public credibility, affect social justice and justice. Corruption has developed into a global problem, which has been paid more and more attention to by the international community and the countries all over the world. In modern society, whether in the West or the East, whether in the developing or developed countries, no country or region can completely eliminate corruption, corruption and bribery, money and power trading, favoritism and perversion of the law, and the existence of these corruption problems. Seriously affect the construction of clean government and clean government culture in various countries and regions. Whether the fight against corruption is successful or not is related to the development and survival of a country's politics, economy and the whole society. It also affects the harmony and stability of the whole society. Therefore, it is a common task for all countries in the world to actively prevent corruption and do a good job in the construction of clean government culture. In many countries, government departments, social organizations, departmental organizations, etc., are closely concerned about the fight against corruption and actively carry out the cultural construction of a clean and honest society, actively respond to various problems and take various measures to solve the problem of corruption. Some countries and regions have also achieved remarkable results in building a clean and honest society. Countries around the world that have achieved significant success in building a culture of integrity include Singapore, Hong Kong in Asia, Finland in Europe, Sweden and so on. Different countries in the world have different political, economic and social systems, so the specific problems and situations in social life are not exactly the same. Every country has its particularity in fighting corruption and advocating honesty. China should draw lessons from Sweden's experience of building a clean government culture. In order to reform and promote the construction of clean government culture in our country, we should constantly supplement all kinds of good methods, policies and suggestions in the process of building a clean government culture. Sweden is the largest country in northern Europe, Sweden's world first-class welfare attracts the attention of the world, at the same time, the achievements of Swedish clean government culture construction are worth learning and drawing lessons from all over the world. Sweden is one of the most clean countries in the world. Its corruption rate is low, the supervision system is perfect, the market economy is highly developed, the administrative efficiency is high, and the cultural construction system of clean government is complete. Summing up and drawing lessons from Swedish clean government culture construction experience has certain promotion function to promote our country clean government culture construction. This paper analyzes the culture of clean government in Sweden from four aspects. The paper is divided into four parts: the first part introduces the definition of some concepts related to the construction of clean government culture, such as culture, clean government and clean government culture. The second part generalizes the effect of Swedish clean government culture construction. The third part discusses the content of Swedish clean government culture construction and the causes of Swedish clean government culture construction. Sweden's legal thought and Sweden's clean government system three aspects to discuss. The fourth part introduces the enlightenment of Swedish clean government culture construction experience to our country. In an increasingly globalized era, it is necessary for us to study and learn from the experience of other countries in building a clean government culture with China. In this paper, the experience of building clean government culture in Sweden, a Nordic country, is of theoretical and practical significance to the construction of clean government culture in our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：河北師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號】：D753.2

【引證文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 劉靜;;淺析云南省廉政文化建設(shè)存在的問題及對策[J];法制與社會;2013年08期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 于濤;新時期巴彥淖爾市國稅系統(tǒng)廉政文化建設(shè)研究[D];內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué);2011年

2 歐陽健;我國現(xiàn)階段縣域腐敗成因及防治對策研究[D];湖南師范大學(xué);2011年

，

本文編號：2014851