發(fā)布時間：2018-05-30 22:37

  本文選題：美國國家安全 + 美國國家安全觀　； 參考：《中國社會科學院研究生院》2001年博士論文

【摘要】： 本文論述冷戰(zhàn)時期美國的國家安全與國內(nèi)民主的關(guān)系。作者在理解美國國家安全、國 家安全觀、及美國民主等概念的基礎(chǔ)上，通過論述冷戰(zhàn)時期三個不同階段美國國家安全與 國內(nèi)民主的關(guān)系，得出有關(guān)結(jié)論。 本文前言概述該論文的意義。 第一章提出有關(guān)概念及分析框架。作者從影響美國國家安全的三個因素(國家生存、 大國地位和意識形態(tài))出發(fā)來界定美國的國家安全；本章在提出國家安全概念的基礎(chǔ)上， 重點論述影響美國國家安全觀形成的因素(國際環(huán)境、政治文化和國內(nèi)輿論在對外政策觀 念上的一致程度)。作者在理解美國民主時，重點放住保障美國民主的政治制度及有利于美 國民主的條件方面。本文的分析框架以國家安全觀及其形成因素為主線，分別討論冷戰(zhàn)時 期三個不同階段美國國家安全與國內(nèi)民主的關(guān)系。 第二章論述冷戰(zhàn)初期美國國家安全與國內(nèi)民主的關(guān)系。這一時期的美國國家安全觀視 蘇聯(lián)及其共產(chǎn)主義意識形態(tài)為關(guān)國安全的最大威脅，主張采取一切手段，，動員全部資源對 付此威脅。這種國家安全觀的形成受當時美國的實力地位及美同國內(nèi)政治文化和國內(nèi)輿論 在對外政策觀念上的一致程度的影響。在這種國家安全觀的影響下，美國歷史上第一次在 和平時期建立起龐大的國家安全機構(gòu)，國家安全至上的觀念影響美國國內(nèi)政治、經(jīng)濟和社 會生活的各方面。國家安全的需要壓倒民主要求。冷戰(zhàn)初期美同國內(nèi)的反共反民主潮流及 麥卡錫主義是國家安全需要壓倒民主要求的具體體現(xiàn)。 第三章論述60年代末和70年代關(guān)國國家安全與國內(nèi)民豐的關(guān)系。這一時期影響美國 國家安全現(xiàn)形成的因素發(fā)生變化。美國實力地位相對衰落；越南戰(zhàn)爭使美國對其政治文化 中有關(guān)自己在世界上的地位的種種假設(shè)產(chǎn)生懷疑，國內(nèi)輿論在對外政策觀念上的一致程度 瓦解。盡管這時的美國仍視蘇聯(lián)為其國家安全的威脅，但上述變化使得美國國內(nèi)在蘇聯(lián)威 脅的程度及美國采取的應(yīng)對措施方面逐漸出現(xiàn)不一致。國會、法院和新聞界對冷戰(zhàn)初期以 來以國家安全為名逐步集中權(quán)力的“帝王般總統(tǒng)”發(fā)起反擊，民主要求上升。水門事件既 是“帝王般總統(tǒng)”發(fā)展的極致，也表明在美國國家安全與國內(nèi)民主的關(guān)系中民主制度又開 始發(fā)揮其應(yīng)有的作用。 第四章論述80年代美國國家安全與國內(nèi)民主的關(guān)系。受國際環(huán)境及盛行于這一時期的 保守主義思潮影響，美國在看待蘇聯(lián)威脅時重新強調(diào)后者的共產(chǎn)主義意識形態(tài)，主張以實 力為后盾，全面對抗蘇聯(lián)。但是美國的國內(nèi)環(huán)境己發(fā)生很大變化，經(jīng)過70年代的改革，國 會以更加有力的姿態(tài)挑戰(zhàn)總統(tǒng)和行政部門在國家安全領(lǐng)域的特權(quán)。國家安全需要與民主要 求的矛盾在這一時期表現(xiàn)得特別激烈。伊朗門事件是這種矛盾的突出反映。 本文的結(jié)論部分在總結(jié)冷戰(zhàn)時期美國國家安全與國內(nèi)民主關(guān)系的基礎(chǔ)上，勾勒出冷戰(zhàn) 后剛代兩者關(guān)系的大致輪廓。
[Abstract]:This article deals with the relationship between American national security and domestic democracy during the cold war.
On the basis of the concept of family security and the concept of American democracy, the article discusses the three stages of the US national security in the Cold War era.
The relationship between democracy in the country and the relevant conclusions are drawn.
The preface of this paper gives an overview of the significance of the paper.
The first chapter puts forward the concepts and analysis framework. The author from the three factors affecting national security in the United States (national survival,
Based on the concept of national security, this chapter sets out to define the national security of the United States.
Focuses on the factors affecting the formation of the national security concept in the United States (international environment, political culture and domestic opinion) in the view of foreign policy.
In understanding democracy in the United States, the author focuses on the political system that safeguards democracy in the United States and its benefits to the United States.
On the condition of democracy in China, the analysis framework of this article takes the national security concept and its forming factors as the main thread, and discusses the cold war time respectively.
The relationship between American national security and domestic democracy at three different stages.
The second chapter discusses the relationship between American national security and domestic democracy in the early cold war.
The Soviet Union and its communist ideology are the greatest threat to the security of the country, and advocate all means to mobilize all resources.
This national security concept was shaped by the strength and beauty of the United States and the domestic political culture and domestic opinion at that time.
The influence of the degree of consistency in the concept of foreign policy is the first time in the history of the United States under the influence of this national security concept.
In peacetime, the establishment of a huge national security agency, the concept of national security supremacy affects the domestic politics, economy and society of the United States.
The need for national security overcame democratic demands. In the early cold war, the trend of anti Communist and anti democratic trends in the United States and in the early days of the cold war and
Mccarthy doctrine is a concrete manifestation of the need for national security to override democratic demands.
The third chapter discusses the relationship between national security and civil and Fung - ing in the late 60s and 70s.
The factors of national security are changing. The strength of the United States is relatively declining. The Vietnam War made the United States its political culture.
Doubts about the assumption of their status in the world and the consistency of domestic public opinion in the concept of foreign policy
Although the United States still viewed the Soviet Union as a threat to its national security, the changes made the Soviet Union in the United States.
The extent of the threat and the measures adopted by the United States gradually disagreed.
The "emperor like President", who has gradually concentrated power under the name of national security, has launched a counter attack, and democracy has demanded an increase.
It is the ultimate development of the "imperial president". It also shows that in the relationship between national security and democracy in the United States, the democratic system is also open.
Begin to play its due role.
The fourth chapter deals with the relationship between American national security and domestic democracy in 80s.
In the view of the conservative ideology, the United States emphasized the latter's communist ideology while looking at the threat of the Soviet Union.
The United States' domestic environment has undergone great changes. After the reform in 70s, the United States' domestic environment has changed greatly.
It will challenge the presidential and executive's privileges in the field of national security in a more forceful manner.
The contradiction of seeking was particularly intense during this period. The Iran gate incident is a prominent reflection of this contradiction.
The conclusion of this paper outlines the cold war on the basis of summing up the relationship between us national security and domestic democracy in the Cold War era.
The general outline of the relationship between the latter two.
【學位授予單位】：中國社會科學院研究生院
【學位級別】：博士
【學位授予年份】：2001
【分類號】：D771.2

【引證文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 黃愛武;;論美國國家安全法律監(jiān)督體制的發(fā)展[J];東方法學;2009年02期

相關(guān)博士學位論文 前3條

1 黃愛武;戰(zhàn)后美國國家安全法律制度研究[D];華東政法大學;2009年

2 國洪梅;美國對蘇聯(lián)的政策研究（1933-1941）[D];東北師范大學;2009年

3 崔明伍;歐洲人權(quán)法院表達自由判例研究[D];華中科技大學;2010年

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前4條

1 孫玉娣;杜魯門時期美國“冷戰(zhàn)共識”的形成[D];山東師范大學;2006年

2 唐世剛;我國現(xiàn)階段文化安全面臨的挑戰(zhàn)及文化戰(zhàn)略應(yīng)對[D];重慶師范大學;2007年

3 邊征賢;“美國式”民主及其對美國外交決策的影響[D];河北師范大學;2007年

4 趙大因;杜魯門執(zhí)政時期“忠誠調(diào)查計劃”研究[D];吉林大學;2013年

本文編號：1957132