本文選題：繁榮公正黨 + 溫和化　； 參考：《中國社會科學院研究生院》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：本文的研究問題是“2003年以來，印度尼西亞（以下簡稱印尼）繁榮公正黨為什么進行了溫和化轉變？”。 經(jīng)過印尼民主改革時期三次大選，在伊斯蘭政黨中，只有繁榮公正黨能夠達成得票率和國會席位不斷增長的成績，成為國會第四大黨。通過研究繁榮公正黨的策略可以加深對印尼政治伊斯蘭的理解。從世界伊斯蘭政治來看，在埃及、土耳其等國家，與繁榮公正黨采取相似策略的伊斯蘭政黨在近期選舉中也取得了成功。國內(nèi)外的經(jīng)驗事實表明這個問題在理論上既具有獨特性，也具有一般性。 本文采用文獻法、基礎的統(tǒng)計方法和個案研究的方法。文中提出了“兩個步驟——四個角度”的分析框架。第一步驟是設定溫和化的定義并操作化概念。在此基礎上檢驗繁榮公正黨的活動是否滿足溫和化的定義。只有驗證了該黨的活動確實具有溫和化的性質(zhì)，才能夠進一步加以分析。第二步驟，本文首先分析了繁榮公正黨溫和化轉變的性質(zhì)，而后從目的、領導結構和意識形態(tài)三個方面解釋溫和化的原因。 結論認為：（1）繁榮公正黨溫和化的性質(zhì)既是實質(zhì)性的也是實用主義的。通過繁榮公正黨的案例印證了伊斯蘭政黨的“雙軌”路線。（2）溫和化動機可能是為了更快的融入民主政治體制，在制度內(nèi)獲得更多的政治資源，而伊斯蘭化目標則間接的受益于溫和化轉變。（3）政黨領導層結構向實用主義派傾斜是溫和化的直接動力。（4）埃及穆斯林兄弟會思想和教育運動在印尼的發(fā)展史是溫和化的意識形態(tài)來源，，但是社會伊斯蘭化的目標可能為該黨今后能否保持溫和化路線劃上問號。文章最后提出實用主義目標和伊斯蘭化目標是一對相互依賴又排斥的矛盾體，是繁榮公正黨未來發(fā)展需要解決的核心問題。
[Abstract]:The research question of this paper is: why did the Prosperity and Justice Party of Indonesia (hereinafter referred to as Indonesia) moderate since 2003? After three general elections during the period of democratic reform in Indonesia, only the Prosperity and Justice Party was able to achieve the result of gaining votes and increasing seats in parliament, becoming the fourth largest party in parliament. By studying the strategy of the Prosperity and Justice Party, we can deepen our understanding of political Islam in Indonesia. Judging from the world's Islamic politics, in countries such as Egypt and Turkey, Islamic parties that have adopted similar tactics to the Prosperity and Justice Party have also been successful in recent elections. The empirical facts at home and abroad show that this problem is both unique and general in theory. This article uses the literature method, the basic statistical method and the case study method. In this paper, an analytical framework of "two steps-four angles" is proposed. The first step is to define and operationalize the concept of moderation. On this basis, test whether the Prosperity and Justice Party's activities meet the definition of moderation. Only by verifying that the party's activities are indeed moderate can they be further analysed. In the second step, this paper first analyzes the nature of the moderate transformation of the Prosperity and Justice Party, and then explains the causes of the moderation from three aspects: the purpose, the leadership structure and the ideology. The conclusion is that the moderate nature of the Prosperity and Justice Party is both substantive and pragmatic. The case of the Prosperity and Justice Party confirms that the "two-track" line of the Islamic party, the "two-track" line, is likely to be moderated in order to integrate more quickly into the democratic political system and gain more political resources within the system. The objective of Islamization, on the other hand, indirectly benefited from the moderate transformation. (3) the leaning of the party leadership structure towards the pragmatists is the direct driving force of the moderation. 4) the history of the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood ideology and education movement in Indonesia is moderate. The source of ideology, But the aim of Islamization may cast a question mark on the party's ability to remain moderate in the future. Finally, the paper points out that pragmatism and Islamization are a pair of interdependent and exclusive contradictions, which are the core problems that need to be solved in the future development of Prosperity and Justice Party.
【學位授予單位】：中國社會科學院研究生院
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D734.2

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前5條

1 范若蘭;;后蘇哈托時代伊斯蘭教與印尼政治民主化[J];當代亞太;2007年04期

2 林德榮;淺析印尼穆斯林與蘇哈托政權的關系[J];當代亞太;1999年04期

3 唐慧;;印度尼西亞伊斯蘭教政黨的崛起及其發(fā)展前景[J];東南亞縱橫;2010年05期

4 溫北炎;印尼伊斯蘭教主流派與極端派初探[J];東南亞研究;2002年04期

5 朱剛琴;淺析新秩序時期后的印尼伊斯蘭教[J];東南亞研究;1999年05期

本文編號：1859656