本文關(guān)鍵詞： 地區(qū)規(guī)范 自由貿(mào)易 民主同盟 東盟方式　出處：《外交學(xué)院》2011年博士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：本文研究的重點是以規(guī)范為手段來塑造東亞地區(qū)秩序的問題,或者說旨在規(guī)定地區(qū)規(guī)范的概念和作用,探索東亞地區(qū)規(guī)范的內(nèi)容、發(fā)揮作用的方式和未來的發(fā)展方向。本文將規(guī)范定義為受到權(quán)力支持的、具有集體正義性的集體觀念;認為地區(qū)規(guī)范對于推動地區(qū)主義發(fā)展起到制度推手、直接動力、確立地區(qū)一體化內(nèi)涵和定義地區(qū)一體化深度的作用。 之所以以東亞秩序塑造為研究重點,是因為東亞秩序當前仍處在動態(tài)變化中。之所以以規(guī)范為研究著手的角度,是因為規(guī)范建設(shè)以及國內(nèi)成為東亞各國解決以上地區(qū)問題一個普遍依托的手段。本文側(cè)重梳理和分析美國和東盟兩個規(guī)范制定方在地區(qū)規(guī)范的制訂、推廣、接受和內(nèi)化方面的作用。這兩個方面具有很強的比較價值,因為美國一直是規(guī)范戰(zhàn)略的實施方,美國通過在東亞進行規(guī)范建設(shè),成功建立起以自由貿(mào)易規(guī)范為基礎(chǔ)的地區(qū)經(jīng)濟秩序和以民主同盟規(guī)范為基礎(chǔ)的地區(qū)政治秩序。冷戰(zhàn)后,隨著中國和東亞各國地區(qū)意識的上升,美國外交政策上也開始體現(xiàn)出對地區(qū)規(guī)范的認同傾向。東盟各國實力都很弱小,即便東盟十國實力加在一起,在經(jīng)濟、軍事、文化等各個領(lǐng)域,其實力也無法與東亞地區(qū)的主要參與國家抗衡。但是,正是東盟獲得了周邊國家中國、日本、韓國的支持,將“東盟方式”推廣成為東亞地區(qū)的新型規(guī)范。 在新時期,這兩方面的規(guī)范都受到了挑戰(zhàn)。美國主導(dǎo)的自由貿(mào)易規(guī)范已經(jīng)成為全球經(jīng)濟秩序的依托,雖然美國、歐洲等自由貿(mào)易主流國家出現(xiàn)了貿(mào)易保護主義傾向,自由貿(mào)易的主導(dǎo)地位不會受到影響。真正的挑戰(zhàn)在于政治和安全方面。由于東盟機構(gòu)本身的制度脆弱性和東盟總體實力的弱影響力,東盟的共同安全規(guī)范缺乏足夠的權(quán)力支持。而美國主導(dǎo)的民主同盟來自冷戰(zhàn)時代的意識形態(tài)對抗觀已經(jīng)不能適應(yīng)新安全問題為主的東亞地區(qū)需求。 最后,本文落腳到地區(qū)規(guī)范研究對于中國外交工作的意義。發(fā)展中的中國在東亞地區(qū)有著關(guān)鍵利益,因此需要參與搭建地區(qū)秩序建設(shè)。本文的主要政策主張是中國以規(guī)范為參與手段,支持和而不同哲學(xué)思想指導(dǎo)下的共同安全規(guī)范,并建立在新安全觀基礎(chǔ)上的整體安全規(guī)范。 總之,本文旨在以地區(qū)規(guī)范為研究視角,研究規(guī)范生成、擴散、內(nèi)化及退化的生命周期理論以及每個階段的關(guān)鍵要素,分析美國和東盟如何制定、推廣符合自己利益的規(guī)范,以及中國如何能借助規(guī)范手段推進國家利益。從整體結(jié)構(gòu)和內(nèi)容來看,本文重點使用了演繹的研究方法。
[Abstract]:The focus of this study is to use norms as a means to shape the East Asian regional order, or to define the concept and role of regional norms, to explore the content of the norms in East Asia. The way to play a role and the future development direction. This paper defines the norm as the collective concept of collective justice supported by power; It is believed that regional norms play an important role in promoting the development of regionalism, promoting the development of regionalism, establishing the connotation of regional integration and defining the depth of regional integration. The focus of the study is that the order of East Asia is still in dynamic change. Because the norm construction and domestic become the East Asian countries to solve the above regional problems a universal means. This paper focuses on the United States and ASEAN two standard-makers in the formulation and promotion of regional norms. The role of acceptance and internalization. These two aspects have a strong comparative value, because the United States has been the implementation of normative strategy, the United States through the norm in East Asia. The regional economic order based on the norms of free trade and the regional political order based on the norms of democratic alliance were successfully established. After the Cold War, the regional consciousness of China and East Asian countries rose. The United States foreign policy also began to reflect the identity of regional norms. ASEAN countries are very weak strength, even if the strength of ASEAN 10 countries together, in the economic, military, cultural and other fields. However, ASEAN has won the support of neighboring countries such as China, Japan and South Korea to promote the ASEAN approach as a new standard in East Asia. In the new era, both of these norms have been challenged. U.S.-led free trade norms have become the basis of the global economic order, although the United States. Protectionist tendencies have emerged in mainstream free trade countries such as Europe. The dominance of free trade will not be affected. The real challenge lies in the political and security aspects... Due to the institutional fragility of the ASEAN institutions themselves and the weak influence of ASEAN's overall strength. The common security norms of ASEAN lack sufficient power support, and the US-led democratic alliance can no longer meet the needs of the East Asian region, which is dominated by new security issues, and the ideological antagonism of the Cold War era has not been able to meet the needs of the East Asian region. In the end, this paper focuses on the significance of the study of regional norms for China's diplomatic work. The developing China has a key interest in East Asia. Therefore, it is necessary to participate in the construction of regional order. The main policy of this paper is to support the common security norms under the guidance of harmony but different philosophies under the guidance of norms as a means of participation in China. And on the basis of the new security concept of the overall safety norms. In a word, the purpose of this paper is to study the life-cycle theory of normative generation, diffusion, internalization and degradation as well as the key elements of each stage from the perspective of regional norms, and to analyze how the United States and ASEAN make it. From the perspective of the whole structure and content, this paper focuses on the deductive research method.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：外交學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D731

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陳寒溪;“東盟方式”與東盟地區(qū)一體化[J];當代亞太;2002年12期

2 馬[F;析冷戰(zhàn)時期及冷戰(zhàn)后美國對東南亞的政策[J];國際觀察;1999年02期

3 曹云華;在大國間周旋——評東盟的大國平衡戰(zhàn)略[J];暨南學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2003年03期

4 龐中英;地區(qū)化、地區(qū)性與地區(qū)主義——論東亞地區(qū)主義[J];世界經(jīng)濟與政治;2003年11期

5 蘇浩;;東亞開放地區(qū)主義的演進與中國的作用[J];世界經(jīng)濟與政治;2006年09期

6 朱立群;林民旺;;赫爾辛基進程30年:塑造共同安全[J];世界經(jīng)濟與政治;2005年12期

7 顧靜;李雪飛;;從“阿米蒂奇報告Ⅱ”看美國亞洲戰(zhàn)略新動向[J];現(xiàn)代國際關(guān)系;2007年04期

8 劉興華;地區(qū)認同與東亞地區(qū)主義[J];現(xiàn)代國際關(guān)系;2004年05期

9 曹英偉,李萍;俄羅斯的東亞政策探究[J];西伯利亞研究;2005年05期

10 唐世平;2010-2015年的中國周邊安全環(huán)境——決定性因素和趨勢展望[J];戰(zhàn)略與管理;2002年05期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 周方銀;國際規(guī)范的演化[D];清華大學(xué);2006年

2 趙乾坤;大國權(quán)力與地區(qū)規(guī)范[D];外交學(xué)院;2006年

3 王曙光;中國地區(qū)主義戰(zhàn)略研究[D];暨南大學(xué);2006年

4 阮宗澤;國際秩序的轉(zhuǎn)型與東亞安全[D];外交學(xué)院;2005年

5 肖歡容;地區(qū)主義理論的歷史演進[D];中國社會科學(xué)院研究生院;2002年

，

本文編號：1476073