本文關鍵詞：泰國他信政權與紅衫軍運動　出處：《華僑大學》2015年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

  更多相關文章： 他信政權 紅衫軍運動 經濟政策 發(fā)展困境

【摘要】：通過分析他信政權和保守陣營的經濟政策,本文認為他信的經濟政策有助于解決新時期泰國農民面臨的發(fā)展困境,故而在他信政權被軍事政變推翻后,爆發(fā)了以農民為主體的支持他信的紅衫軍運動;而保守陣營上臺后,實行新的經濟政策,危及農民的利益,相反,他信的后繼者沙馬和英拉政府能夠延續(xù)他信的經濟政策,故而在沙馬和英拉政府下臺后,又爆發(fā)了支持沙馬和英拉的紅衫軍運動。面對經濟全球化帶來的機遇與挑戰(zhàn),他信政權選擇了出口與內需并重的“雙軌制”經濟發(fā)展策略。為此,他信政權實施了一系列惠農的“草根政策”,以便擴大農產品的出口和國內農村消費市場�！安莞摺钡膶嵤┊a生了深遠的影響,一方面泰國經濟得到持續(xù)快速發(fā)展;另一方面,“草根政策”也有助于解決新時期泰國農民面臨的發(fā)展困境。由于長期以來泰國政府實施“重城市、輕農村”的發(fā)展策略,新時期的泰國農民面臨著發(fā)展困境,即城鄉(xiāng)貧富差距擴大化和農業(yè)發(fā)展方式落后的困境。通過實施一系列“草根政策”,農民的經濟收入得到提升,城鄉(xiāng)貧富差距得以縮小,同時,落后的農業(yè)發(fā)展方式也在逐步升級。因此,他信的經濟政策有助于新時期泰國農民發(fā)展困境的解決。所以在他信政權被推翻后,廣大泰國農民參與紅衫軍運動,以便在政治上支持他信。面對經濟全球化,保守陣營選擇“充足經濟”經濟發(fā)展策略�！俺渥憬洕币髽嫿ā白越o自足”的生產消費體系和“適度滿足”的發(fā)展理念。為此,保守陣營縮減了“草根政策”,特別是具有“造血”功能的生產性扶持政策�！俺渥憬洕辈呗缘膶嵤┎焕谛聲r期農民面臨的發(fā)展困境的解決,損害了農民的利益。因此,在保守陣營上臺后,泰國農民希望他信的后繼者沙馬和英拉能夠執(zhí)政,以幫助解決其面臨的發(fā)展困境。故而,在保守陣營執(zhí)政后,農民又不斷參與紅衫軍運動、支持他信的后繼者執(zhí)政。
[Abstract]:By analyzing the economic policies of the Thaksin regime and the conservative camp, this paper argues that Thaksin's economic policy will help to solve the development dilemma faced by Thai farmers in the new era, and therefore after the overthrow of the Thaksin regime by a military coup. A peasant-led red shirt movement has erupted in support of Mr Thaksin; When the conservative camp came to power, it implemented a new economic policy, endangering the interests of peasants. On the contrary, Thaksin's successors, Samar and Yingluck, were able to continue Thaksin's economic policy, so after the fall of the Samak and Yingluck governments. In the face of the opportunities and challenges brought about by economic globalization, the Thaksin regime has chosen a "two-track" economic development strategy, which places equal emphasis on exports and domestic demand. The Thaksin regime has implemented a series of "grassroots policies" in favour of farmers in order to expand the export of agricultural products and the domestic rural consumer market. The implementation of the "grassroots policy" has had a profound impact. On the one hand, Thailand's economy has been sustained and rapid development; On the other hand, the "grassroots policy" also helps to solve the development dilemma faced by Thai farmers in the new period. For a long time, the Thai government has implemented the development strategy of "emphasizing the city rather than the countryside". In the new era, Thai farmers are faced with the difficulties of development, that is, the widening gap between urban and rural wealth and the backward way of agricultural development. Through the implementation of a series of "grassroots policies", farmers' economic income has been raised. The gap between urban and rural rich and poor can be narrowed, at the same time, the backward way of agricultural development is also gradually upgrading. Therefore, Thaksin's economic policy helps to solve the plight of Thai farmers' development in the new period. So after the overthrow of the Thaksin regime. Thai farmers have joined the Red shirts movement to support Thaksin politically in the face of economic globalization. The conservative camp chooses the "sufficient economy" economic development strategy. The "sufficient economy" requires the construction of the "self-sufficient" production and consumption system and the "moderately satisfied" development concept. The conservative camp has reduced the "grassroots policy", especially the productive support policy with the function of "hematopoiesis". The implementation of the "sufficient economy" strategy is not conducive to the solution of the development dilemma faced by farmers in the new period. So after the conservative camp came to power, Thai farmers wanted Thaksin's successors, Samar and Yingluck, to be in power to help solve their development woes. So, after the conservative camp came to power. Farmers continue to participate in the Red shirt movement, supporting Thaksin's successors in power.
【學位授予單位】：華僑大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D733.6

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 周方冶;;泰國非暴力群眾運動與政治轉型[J];當代亞太;2007年07期

2 段立生;他信政府與泰國經濟復蘇[J];東南亞縱橫;2003年03期

3 謝麗梅;他信執(zhí)政四年來泰國經濟形勢分析[J];東南亞縱橫;2005年07期

4 陳利;;從泰國前總理他信治國政策解讀泰國政治風波[J];東南亞縱橫;2009年07期

5 孔建勛;;當前泰國中產階層的政治表達和政黨傾向[J];東南亞南亞研究;2010年02期

6 張錫鎮(zhèn);;他信政府的危機及其啟示[J];東南亞研究;2006年05期

7 龔浩群;;泰國政治現(xiàn)代化研究述評——站在非西方國家的角度思考[J];東南亞研究;2008年03期

8 王沖;;試析泰國社會運動和政治不穩(wěn)定的根源[J];東南亞研究;2009年06期

9 李文;;戰(zhàn)后東亞現(xiàn)代化進程中的農民運動[J];南洋問題研究;2009年02期

10 李峰;;他信經濟學及其對后他信時代泰國經濟政策的影響[J];南洋問題研究;2009年04期

，

本文編號：1368274