鑒定人錯(cuò)誤鑒定責(zé)任追究
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2019-01-06 14:18
【摘要】： 本文分緒論、正文和結(jié)論三部分內(nèi)容，約三萬字。 緒論簡要介紹了我國司法鑒定存在的問題，指出了研究如何追究鑒定人責(zé)任的重要性，并限定本文的研究范圍是鑒定人錯(cuò)誤鑒定責(zé)任追究。 正文分為五章： 第一章主要從追究鑒定人責(zé)任可以保障鑒定結(jié)論的質(zhì)量和保障鑒定人的獨(dú)立性的角度論述了追究鑒定人責(zé)任的必要性，并論述了追究鑒定人責(zé)任的合理性問題，使鑒定人責(zé)任追究成為必然。在此基礎(chǔ)上，筆者論述了追究鑒定人責(zé)任所應(yīng)當(dāng)遵循的原則，并概括介紹了鑒定人責(zé)任追究的法律保障及責(zé)任的種類。 第二章主要討論鑒定人錯(cuò)誤鑒定責(zé)任的追究范圍。筆者認(rèn)為追究鑒定人的責(zé)任應(yīng)限定在鑒定人有主觀過錯(cuò)的范圍內(nèi)，如果鑒定人主觀上既無故意也無過失，就應(yīng)當(dāng)不追究鑒定人責(zé)任。 第三章筆者具體論述了鑒定人錯(cuò)誤鑒定應(yīng)承擔(dān)民事責(zé)任、刑事責(zé)任、行政責(zé)任以及秩序責(zé)任的原因和條件等問題。 第四章探討錯(cuò)誤鑒定責(zé)任的承擔(dān)主體，，重點(diǎn)討論鑒定人承擔(dān)責(zé)任時(shí)與其他相關(guān)主體的責(zé)任分擔(dān)問題，其中主要分析了鑒定機(jī)構(gòu)和鑒定人的責(zé)任承擔(dān)問題、司法機(jī)關(guān)內(nèi)部的鑒定人錯(cuò)誤鑒定的責(zé)任承擔(dān)問題以及數(shù)個(gè)鑒定人之間的責(zé)任承擔(dān)問題。 第五章探討錯(cuò)誤鑒定責(zé)任的追究程序，主要討論對(duì)于鑒定人責(zé)任追究來講應(yīng)當(dāng)特別注意或者現(xiàn)行法律沒有針對(duì)性規(guī)定或規(guī)定不完善的程序問題，包括錯(cuò)誤鑒定的確認(rèn)、舉證責(zé)任問題以及鑒定人責(zé)任追究程序中的權(quán)利保障問題。 結(jié)論對(duì)全文進(jìn)行了總結(jié)，強(qiáng)調(diào)只有從實(shí)體和程序兩個(gè)方面對(duì)鑒定人錯(cuò)誤鑒定責(zé)任追究進(jìn)行討論才能使責(zé)任追究真正得到落實(shí)。
[Abstract]:This article is divided into three parts: introduction, text and conclusion, about 30,000 words. The introduction briefly introduces the problems existing in judicial expertise in our country, points out the importance of studying how to investigate the responsibility of experts, and limits the scope of this paper to investigate the responsibility of experts' error identification. The text is divided into five chapters: the first chapter mainly discusses the necessity of investigating expert responsibility from the point of view of ensuring the quality of expert conclusion and the independence of expert. It also discusses the rationality of investigating the connoisseur's responsibility, which makes it inevitable to investigate the connoisseur's responsibility. On this basis, the author discusses the principles that should be followed in the investigation of connoisseur's responsibility, and generalizes the legal guarantee and the types of liability of the ascertainer's liability investigation. The second chapter mainly discusses the scope of the identification of the fault identification responsibility. The author thinks that the responsibility of investigating expert should be limited to the scope of subjective fault. If the expert has neither intention nor fault subjectively, he should not be held responsible. In the third chapter, the author discusses the reasons and conditions of the appraiser's wrong identification, such as civil liability, criminal liability, administrative responsibility and order responsibility. The fourth chapter discusses the main body of the responsibility of false identification, focuses on the problem of the burden sharing between the appraiser and other relevant subjects, and mainly analyzes the problem of the responsibility of the appraisal institution and the expert. The problem of bearing the responsibility of the experts in the judicial organs and the responsibility between several experts. The fifth chapter discusses the procedure of investigating the responsibility for false identification. It mainly discusses the procedure that should be paid special attention to or that the current law has no specific provisions or imperfect provisions, including the confirmation of false identification. The burden of proof and the protection of rights in the procedure of ascertaining the responsibility of experts. The conclusion summarizes the full text, and emphasizes that only by discussing the responsibility investigation of expert's error identification from two aspects of entity and procedure, can we really carry out the responsibility investigation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2002
【分類號(hào)】：D918.9
[Abstract]:This article is divided into three parts: introduction, text and conclusion, about 30,000 words. The introduction briefly introduces the problems existing in judicial expertise in our country, points out the importance of studying how to investigate the responsibility of experts, and limits the scope of this paper to investigate the responsibility of experts' error identification. The text is divided into five chapters: the first chapter mainly discusses the necessity of investigating expert responsibility from the point of view of ensuring the quality of expert conclusion and the independence of expert. It also discusses the rationality of investigating the connoisseur's responsibility, which makes it inevitable to investigate the connoisseur's responsibility. On this basis, the author discusses the principles that should be followed in the investigation of connoisseur's responsibility, and generalizes the legal guarantee and the types of liability of the ascertainer's liability investigation. The second chapter mainly discusses the scope of the identification of the fault identification responsibility. The author thinks that the responsibility of investigating expert should be limited to the scope of subjective fault. If the expert has neither intention nor fault subjectively, he should not be held responsible. In the third chapter, the author discusses the reasons and conditions of the appraiser's wrong identification, such as civil liability, criminal liability, administrative responsibility and order responsibility. The fourth chapter discusses the main body of the responsibility of false identification, focuses on the problem of the burden sharing between the appraiser and other relevant subjects, and mainly analyzes the problem of the responsibility of the appraisal institution and the expert. The problem of bearing the responsibility of the experts in the judicial organs and the responsibility between several experts. The fifth chapter discusses the procedure of investigating the responsibility for false identification. It mainly discusses the procedure that should be paid special attention to or that the current law has no specific provisions or imperfect provisions, including the confirmation of false identification. The burden of proof and the protection of rights in the procedure of ascertaining the responsibility of experts. The conclusion summarizes the full text, and emphasizes that only by discussing the responsibility investigation of expert's error identification from two aspects of entity and procedure, can we really carry out the responsibility investigation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2002
【分類號(hào)】：D918.9
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 諶宏偉;;法院委任之鑒定人錯(cuò)誤鑒定的民事責(zé)任[J];四川警察學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年04期
2 侯書和;;略論公共危機(jī)管理問責(zé)制[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)與社會(huì)發(fā)展;2011年05期
3 ;黨政領(lǐng)導(dǎo)干部選拔任用工作責(zé)任追究辦法(試行)[J];人事天地;2010年20期
4 ;省情速遞[J];領(lǐng)導(dǎo)決策信息;2011年20期
5 ;一部深入推進(jìn)反腐倡廉建設(shè)的基礎(chǔ)性法規(guī)——解讀《關(guān)于實(shí)行黨風(fēng)廉政建設(shè)責(zé)任制的規(guī)定》[J];共產(chǎn)黨人;2011年02期
6 陳書紀(jì);;貫徹落實(shí)四項(xiàng)監(jiān)督制度與提高領(lǐng)導(dǎo)干部選拔任用公信度[J];中共云南省委黨校學(xué)報(bào);2011年03期
7 秦佩華;胡s
本文編號(hào)：2402904
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/gongan/2402904.html
教材專著
