發(fā)布時間：2018-10-19 20:25

【摘要】： 本文共五部分，三萬余字。 第一部分是律師在場權(quán)的基本理論研究。首先，，就律師在場權(quán)的起源與內(nèi)涵進行了介紹。然后，從權(quán)力制約、人權(quán)保障、有效辯護和程序公正四方面分析了確立律師在場權(quán)的法理基礎(chǔ)。 第二部分分析我國律師在場權(quán)的缺失及其原因。認為我國存在立法和司法理念的雙重缺失，從我國偵查實踐中對口供的過分依賴、傳統(tǒng)法制觀念中人權(quán)保障理念的缺乏以及正當(dāng)程序理念的缺乏三方面分析了我國律師在場權(quán)缺失的原因。 第三部分論述了律師在場權(quán)的必要性和可行性。認為律師在場權(quán)是彌補偵查程序結(jié)構(gòu)性缺陷、實現(xiàn)司法公正、構(gòu)建和諧社會和適應(yīng)國際化與全球化發(fā)展的需要。并從觀念層面、制度層面和操作層面三個角度論證了我國確立律師在場權(quán)的可行性。 第四部分是關(guān)于律師在場權(quán)的比較考察。該部分選取了英美法系中的美國、英國、澳大利亞，大陸法系中的德國、法國、意大利，我國臺灣和香港地區(qū)以及歐洲人權(quán)法院、國際公約等作為考察對象，通過研究這些國家、國際組織和地區(qū)律師在場權(quán)的立法規(guī)定與司法實踐，為我國律師在場權(quán)的確立提供比較與借鑒。 第五部分是確立我國律師在場權(quán)的制度構(gòu)想。第一、確立我國律師在場權(quán)的核心問題。包括律師在場權(quán)適用的案件范圍、設(shè)置模式以及在場律師的權(quán)利和義務(wù)。第二、立法建議。從律師在場權(quán)的行使程序、訊問條件和救濟程序三方面提出立法建議。第三、需要完善的相關(guān)問題。建立獨立于偵查權(quán)之外的獨立羈押管理體制和嚴格的非法言詞證據(jù)排除規(guī)則。
[Abstract]:This article has five parts, more than 30,000 words. The first part is the basic theoretical research of lawyer's right to be present. First of all, the author introduces the origin and connotation of lawyer's right to be present. Then, it analyzes the legal basis of establishing lawyer's right to be present from four aspects: power restriction, human rights guarantee, effective defense and procedural justice. The second part analyzes the absence and reasons of lawyers' right to be present in our country. The author thinks that there is a double lack of legislation and judicial idea in our country, and that there is too much reliance on confession in the investigation practice of our country. The lack of the concept of human rights protection and the lack of the concept of due process in the traditional concept of legal system have analyzed the reasons for the absence of the right of lawyers to be present in our country. The third part discusses the necessity and feasibility of lawyer's right to be present. The author holds that the right of lawyer's presence is necessary to make up for the structural defects of investigation procedure, to realize judicial justice, to construct a harmonious society and to adapt to the development of internationalization and globalization. At the same time, the feasibility of establishing lawyer's right to be present in our country is proved from three aspects: concept, system and operation. The fourth part is about the comparative investigation of lawyer's right to be present. In this part, the United States, Britain, Australia, Germany, France, Italy, Taiwan and Hong Kong, as well as the European Court of Human Rights and international conventions in the common law system are selected as the objects of investigation. By studying the legislative provisions and judicial practice of lawyers' right to be present in these countries, international organizations and regions, this paper provides a comparison and reference for the establishment of lawyers' right to be present in our country. The fifth part is to establish the system conception of the lawyer's right to be present in our country. First, establish the core problem of lawyer's right to be present in our country. It includes the scope of cases, the mode of setting up and the rights and obligations of lawyers. Second, legislative proposals. The legislative suggestions are put forward from three aspects: the exercise procedure of lawyer's right to be present, the condition of interrogation and the procedure of relief. Third, need to improve the relevant issues. Establish an independent custody management system independent of the investigation power and strict exclusionary rules of illegal verbal evidence.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2006
【分類號】：D918.5;D925.2

【引證文獻】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 孫浩博;淺析刑事訴訟中的律師在場權(quán)[D];中國政法大學(xué);2011年

2 張靜靜;我國律師執(zhí)業(yè)權(quán)利保障研究[D];華中師范大學(xué);2011年

3 侯太利;偵查訊問時律師在場權(quán)研究[D];中國政法大學(xué);2010年

本文編號：2282265