【摘要】： 作為司法制度的重要組成部分,司法鑒定制度在現(xiàn)代訴訟中發(fā)揮著日益重要的作用。司法鑒定人是司法鑒定工作的具體承擔(dān)者和實(shí)施者,而司法鑒定人的選任因其對(duì)鑒定過(guò)程乃至對(duì)鑒定意見(jiàn)的重大影響,被認(rèn)為是鑒定人制度中的核心問(wèn)題。司法鑒定人選任制度實(shí)際上包含三個(gè)方面的問(wèn)題,一是誰(shuí)來(lái)選的問(wèn)題(主體問(wèn)題),二是選誰(shuí)的問(wèn)題(客體問(wèn)題),三是怎么選的問(wèn)題(中介問(wèn)題)。以上三個(gè)方面問(wèn)題即分別是鑒定人選任權(quán)配置、鑒定人資質(zhì)和鑒定人選任方式問(wèn)題。這三個(gè)方面之間相互銜接、環(huán)環(huán)相扣,從而使司法鑒定人的選任呈現(xiàn)出完整的動(dòng)態(tài)過(guò)程。 2005年2月全國(guó)人大常委會(huì)審議通過(guò)《關(guān)于司法鑒定管理問(wèn)題的決定》,2005年9月司法部公布《司法鑒定人登記管理辦法》,2007年8月司法部公布《司法鑒定程序通則》,對(duì)我國(guó)司法鑒定人的選任作了初步規(guī)范,初步確立了司法鑒定人選任制度的基本框架。但是,這些法律、規(guī)章的規(guī)定過(guò)于原則和籠統(tǒng),沒(méi)有從根本上消除現(xiàn)行司法鑒定人選任制度存在的,諸如鑒定人選任權(quán)配置不合理、鑒定人資格制度不完備以及鑒定人選任方式不民主等亟待解決的問(wèn)題。因此,從建立系統(tǒng)、完善的司法鑒定人選任制度目標(biāo)出發(fā),有必要對(duì)我國(guó)司法鑒定人選任制度的相關(guān)問(wèn)題作進(jìn)一步的研究和探討。 構(gòu)建符合現(xiàn)代訴訟要求,兼顧公正、效率的司法鑒定人選任制度,一方面必須把握兩大法系國(guó)家司法鑒定人選任制度發(fā)展趨勢(shì),從比較研究中探求規(guī)律,汲取營(yíng)養(yǎng);另一方面必須植根本土資源,在我國(guó)訴訟制度改革整體架構(gòu)中,找到一條符合現(xiàn)實(shí)國(guó)情的鑒定人選任制度改革之路。在我國(guó)司法鑒定人選任制度的具體構(gòu)想上,一是要構(gòu)建當(dāng)事人為主、法院為輔的司法鑒定人選任權(quán)配置模式;二是要建立嚴(yán)格完備的司法鑒定人資格制度;三是要確立當(dāng)事人合意基礎(chǔ)上的司法鑒定人選任方式;四是要建立和完善專(zhuān)家輔助人制度、司法鑒定人回避制度、司法鑒定人重新選任制度、司法鑒定法律援助制度等相關(guān)配套制度。
[Abstract]:As an important part of judicial system, judicial expertise system plays an increasingly important role in modern litigation. The judicial expert is the concrete bearer and the implementer of the judicial appraisal, and the selection of the judicial expert is considered the core problem in the system of the expert because of its great influence on the appraisal process and even on the appraisal opinion. The system of selecting and appointing judicial appraisers actually includes three aspects: one is who chooses (subject), the other is who (object), and the third is how to choose (intermediary). The above three problems are the allocation of experts' right of selection, the qualification of experts and the selection of experts. These three aspects are interlinked with each other, In February 2005, the standing Committee of the National people's Congress deliberated and adopted the decision on the Administration of Forensic expertise, which was published by the Ministry of Justice in September 2005. Methods for the Administration of the Registration of legal experts. In August 2007, the Ministry of Justice promulgated the General rules for Forensic Identification procedures, which made a preliminary standard for the selection and appointment of judicial experts in China. It establishes the basic frame of the system of selecting and appointing judicial experts. However, the provisions of these laws and regulations are too principled and general, and do not fundamentally eliminate the existence of the current system of selecting and appointing judicial experts, such as the unreasonable allocation of experts' right to choose. The problems such as incomplete qualification system and undemocratic selection of experts need to be solved. Therefore, it is necessary to further study and discuss the relevant problems of judicial expert selection system in our country from the goal of establishing a system and a perfect system of selecting and appointing judicial appraisers. On the one hand, we must grasp the development trend of judicial appraiser selection system in the two legal system countries, and seek the law from the comparative study, and absorb the nutrition; On the other hand, we must take root in the local resources and find a way to reform the system of selecting and appointing experts in accordance with the actual situation in the overall framework of the reform of litigation system in our country. In the concrete conception of the judicial expert selection system in our country, the first is to construct the mode of allocation of judicial expert's right to choose and appoint, the other is to establish a strict and complete system of judicial expert qualification, the first is to construct the allocation mode of judicial expert's right, the other is to set up a strict and complete system of judicial expert's qualification. Third, it is necessary to establish the method of selecting and appointing judicial experts on the basis of the parties' agreement; fourth, to establish and perfect the system of expert assistant persons, judicial experts' withdrawal system, and judicial experts' re-appointment system. Judicial expertise legal aid system and other related supporting systems.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：安徽大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2007
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D918.9

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 漆濤;刑事司法鑒定的中立性研究[D];湖南大學(xué);2010年

2 宋揚(yáng);論我國(guó)司法鑒定人資格的現(xiàn)狀與改革[D];中南大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號(hào)：2270521