【摘要】：自2003年我國正式開展社區(qū)矯正試點(diǎn)工作至今已經(jīng)過了十個(gè)年頭，我國在這十年的矯正試點(diǎn)工作中積累了豐富的實(shí)踐經(jīng)驗(yàn)，取得了值得肯定的成績。但隨著社區(qū)矯正工作步步深入，其中所暴露出的問題亟待解決，首先便是社區(qū)矯正的立法問題。2011年5月，社區(qū)矯正正式列入刑法之中，由此我國刑罰體系的主體部分便以生命刑、自由刑、社區(qū)刑三刑重構(gòu)，在這以前社區(qū)矯正還只是主要依托最高人民法院等有關(guān)部門的法律規(guī)定以及各試點(diǎn)地方頒布的條例，并不具有法律形式，刑罰體系重構(gòu)后以緩刑、假釋作為與自由刑、生命刑的連接通道，這是首次以法律形式對(duì)社區(qū)矯正給予確認(rèn)。但不足的是許多規(guī)定過于籠統(tǒng)和原則，在實(shí)踐中執(zhí)行起來并不容易。本文站在我國社區(qū)矯正制度存在的問題的角度進(jìn)行論述，同時(shí)參考國外一些較先進(jìn)成熟的經(jīng)驗(yàn)，試著對(duì)完善我國社區(qū)矯正工作提出幾點(diǎn)建議。 本文共分為五部分，第一部分對(duì)本文的選題背景、意義、思路及方法進(jìn)行剖析，同時(shí)對(duì)社區(qū)矯正制度的定義和內(nèi)容進(jìn)行闡述，分析了大陸、英美及我國臺(tái)灣地區(qū)對(duì)矯正制度概念的界定，并簡要敘述了我國社區(qū)矯正制度的發(fā)展歷程。同時(shí)，從原則、流程及具體制度三個(gè)方面對(duì)社區(qū)矯正制度的內(nèi)容進(jìn)行論述，最后依據(jù)各法律法規(guī)對(duì)我國社區(qū)矯正制度執(zhí)行的主體進(jìn)行了一個(gè)簡單的概括。 第二部分為我國社區(qū)矯正制度所面臨的問題以及原因剖析，首先從立法滯后、人員素質(zhì)、運(yùn)作機(jī)制以及監(jiān)督機(jī)構(gòu)主體四個(gè)方面來闡述我國社區(qū)矯正制度綿連的問題，并相對(duì)的對(duì)這些問題的產(chǎn)生進(jìn)行剖析，便于后文的寫作。 第三部分主要圍繞國際上的一些國家的社區(qū)矯正制度來撰寫，，以美國、英國、日本以及我國香港為例，分別就其社區(qū)矯正制度的運(yùn)行做了簡單的概述，為我國的社區(qū)矯正制度的完善提供了一定的借鑒意義。 第四部分以社區(qū)矯正制度的監(jiān)督主體公、檢、法、司為主，分別圍繞這四個(gè)監(jiān)督主體的職能地位進(jìn)行分析，以公安機(jī)關(guān)與司法機(jī)關(guān)為重點(diǎn)闡述。 最后一部分是以公、檢、司、法為主題，探討完善我國社區(qū)矯正制度的幾點(diǎn)建議。
[Abstract]:Since 2003, it has been ten years since our country formally launched the pilot work of community correction. Our country has accumulated rich practical experience in this decade of correction pilot work, and has made positive achievements. However, with the further development of community correction, the problems that have been exposed are urgent to be solved, first of all, the legislation of community correction. In May 2011, community correction was formally included in the criminal law. As a result, the main part of our country's penalty system is reconstructed with life penalty, free punishment, and community punishment. Before this, community correction was mainly based on the legal provisions of the relevant departments such as the Supreme people's Court and the regulations promulgated by various pilot localities. There is no legal form, after the restructuring of the penalty system, probation, parole as the link with the free punishment, life penalty, this is the first legal form of community correction to be confirmed. However, many of the provisions are too general and principle, and it is not easy to carry out in practice. From the point of view of the problems existing in the community correction system of our country, this paper discusses the problems, and at the same time, referring to some more advanced and mature experiences of foreign countries, tries to put forward some suggestions to perfect the community correction work in our country. This paper is divided into five parts. The first part analyzes the background, significance, train of thought and methods of this paper. At the same time, it expounds the definition and content of community correction system, and analyzes the mainland. The concept of correction system is defined in Britain, America and Taiwan, and the development of community correction system in China is briefly described. At the same time, the content of community correction system is discussed from three aspects of principle, process and concrete system. Finally, the main body of community correction system in our country is summarized according to the laws and regulations. The second part is the analysis of the problems and causes of the community correction system in our country. Firstly, it expounds the problems of the continuity of the community correction system in our country from four aspects: the legislation lag, the quality of the personnel, the operation mechanism and the main body of the supervision organization. And the relative analysis of these problems, facilitate the later writing. The third part mainly focuses on the community correction system of some countries in the world. Taking the United States, the United Kingdom, Japan and Hong Kong as the examples, the author makes a brief overview of the operation of the community correction system in the United States, the United Kingdom, Japan and Hong Kong respectively. It provides some reference for the improvement of community correction system in our country. The fourth part focuses on the supervision of the community correction system of the public, inspection, law, department, respectively around the four supervisory subjects of the functional status of the analysis, focusing on the public security organs and judicial organs as the focus. The last part discusses some suggestions on how to perfect the system of community correction.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：D926.8

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 管仁亮;;社區(qū)矯正制度芻論[J];保定學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年04期

2 丁雷;;和諧社會(huì)下社區(qū)矯正制度的初探[J];太原城市職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年04期

3 吳宗憲;關(guān)于社區(qū)矯正若干問題思考[J];中國司法;2004年07期

4 高銘暄;;社區(qū)矯正寫入刑法的重大意義[J];中國司法;2011年03期

5 梁桂芝;孫霽;;我國社區(qū)矯正制度探析[J];大連干部學(xué)刊;2009年11期

6 任建通;方杰;劉書正;;對(duì)完善社區(qū)矯正制度的探析[J];法制與社會(huì);2008年22期

7 楊震;;社區(qū)矯正制度在中國[J];法制與社會(huì);2009年15期

8 孫永成;袁源;;對(duì)我國社區(qū)矯正制度的思考[J];法制與社會(huì);2009年17期

9 杜浩渺;;從刑法修正案(八)看我國社區(qū)矯正的發(fā)展——兼論對(duì)社區(qū)矯正體系構(gòu)建的展望[J];法制與社會(huì);2011年12期

10 馬書輝;;初探社區(qū)矯正制度的法律架構(gòu)與完善[J];遼寧公安司法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年04期

本文編號(hào)：2222420