【摘要】： 本文的第一部分著力于對(duì)鑒定結(jié)論的相關(guān)理論問(wèn)題進(jìn)行明晰,在分析鑒定結(jié)論的證據(jù)屬性的基礎(chǔ)上得出,鑒定結(jié)論從訴訟的角度分析其本質(zhì)是一種訴訟行為;從證據(jù)的角度是人的證據(jù)、言詞證據(jù);從鑒定對(duì)象的角度涉及的是訴訟中的專門(mén)性問(wèn)題,所以其理應(yīng)遵循訴訟程序的要求對(duì)其進(jìn)行質(zhì)證。 循著司法鑒定與質(zhì)證關(guān)系的進(jìn)路,在本文的第二部分則努力尋找鑒定結(jié)論與質(zhì)證之間的法理基礎(chǔ),從經(jīng)濟(jì)分析和法律論證的角度進(jìn)行評(píng)析,結(jié)果是用程序的方法來(lái)解決程序的問(wèn)題,用質(zhì)證的方式來(lái)解決實(shí)踐中的鑒定問(wèn)題。 第三部分主要是對(duì)當(dāng)今世界其它國(guó)家的鑒定結(jié)論質(zhì)證制度進(jìn)行比較考察,在比較分析的基礎(chǔ)上,找出其制度的合理性和內(nèi)在規(guī)律,為我們的鑒定制度完善提供一個(gè)坐標(biāo)。 本文的第四部分是全文的核心,主要從制度構(gòu)建上著手,程序上從庭前展示和交叉詢問(wèn)兩個(gè)部分來(lái)進(jìn)行完善,制度上完善證人出庭作證制度和設(shè)立專家輔助人參與質(zhì)證規(guī)則。通過(guò)對(duì)這個(gè)幾個(gè)問(wèn)題的細(xì)致考察,試圖以質(zhì)證程序?yàn)橥黄瓶?在直接言辭原則、公開(kāi)原則、當(dāng)事人充分參與原則以及有效辯護(hù)原則為構(gòu)建目標(biāo)下的程序正義理論上,為我國(guó)當(dāng)前鑒定結(jié)論運(yùn)用中遇到的種種問(wèn)題提供一種全新的解決途徑
[Abstract]:The first part of this paper focuses on the identification of theoretical issues related to the clear conclusion in the analysis of the evidence of the conclusion on the basis of attribute, the conclusion from the point of view of litigation analysis of its nature is a litigation act; From the point of view of evidence is human evidence, verbal evidence; from the point of view of the object of identification is involved in the issue of specialization in litigation, so it should follow the requirements of the proceedings to cross-examine them. Following the path of the relationship between forensic identification and cross-examination, in the second part of this paper, we try to find the legal basis between the conclusion of identification and cross-examination, and analyze from the angle of economic analysis and legal argumentation. The result is to solve the problem of procedure by the method of procedure, and to solve the problem of identification in practice by means of cross-examination. The third part mainly makes a comparative investigation on the system of cross-examination of appraisal conclusion in other countries in the world. On the basis of comparative analysis, it finds out the rationality and inherent law of the system, and provides a coordinate for the perfection of our appraisal system. The fourth part of this paper is the core of the full text, mainly from the system construction, the procedure from the pre-court display and cross-examination to improve the two parts, the system of witnesses to testify in court and the establishment of expert assistant to participate in cross-examination rules. Through the careful investigation of these questions, this paper tries to take cross-examination procedure as the breakthrough point, in order to construct the procedural justice theory under the principle of direct speech, the principle of openness, the principle of full participation of the parties and the principle of effective defense. To provide a new way to solve the problems encountered in the application of the current appraisal conclusions in China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南昌大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2008
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D918.9

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 潘文榮;林永鵬;;試論檢察機(jī)關(guān)對(duì)技術(shù)性鑒定結(jié)論的文證審查[J];中國(guó)司法鑒定;2008年01期

2 齊樹(shù)潔;董揚(yáng);;鑒定人出庭質(zhì)證規(guī)則的比較分析[J];中國(guó)司法鑒定;2009年04期

3 任建民,范建靈;淺析影響法醫(yī)鑒定結(jié)論作為證據(jù)使用的因素[J];人民檢察;2004年10期

4 趙新立;陳如超;;刑事法官與鑒定人事實(shí)認(rèn)定的比較與整合[J];湖北社會(huì)科學(xué);2011年06期

5 卞建林,郭志媛;規(guī)范司法鑒定程序之立法勢(shì)在必行[J];中國(guó)司法鑒定;2005年04期

6 陳衛(wèi)東;李偉;;論鑒定結(jié)論的證據(jù)能力[J];中國(guó)司法鑒定;2007年03期

7 鳳雯杰;;試論鑒定結(jié)論的認(rèn)證[J];法制與社會(huì);2007年10期

8 王秀麗;;刑事訴訟中應(yīng)用司法會(huì)計(jì)的理論初探[J];新疆警官高等專科學(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2006年02期

9 姜琳瑋;江濤;馮斌;;淺議鑒定結(jié)論的運(yùn)用[J];中國(guó)司法鑒定;2005年06期

10 張玉鑲;;再論刑事偵查中同一鑒定的幾個(gè)問(wèn)題——兼與高進(jìn)同志商榷[J];中外法學(xué);1991年04期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前10條

1 趙麗華;;醫(yī)療鑒定結(jié)論在訴訟中的效力[A];2009年浙江省醫(yī)學(xué)倫理學(xué)與衛(wèi)生法學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文匯編[C];2009年

2 時(shí)波;;對(duì)法醫(yī)學(xué)重復(fù)鑒定的思考[A];中國(guó)法醫(yī)學(xué)會(huì)全國(guó)第十一次法醫(yī)臨床學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)研討會(huì)論文集[C];2008年

3 楊曉娜;;傷害案件中鑒定結(jié)論存在的問(wèn)題及對(duì)策[A];中國(guó)犯罪學(xué)研究會(huì)第十三屆學(xué)術(shù)研討會(huì)論文集[C];2004年

4 李祖富;;淺談刑事訴訟活動(dòng)中法醫(yī)鑒定應(yīng)遵循的幾條原則[A];全國(guó)第六次法醫(yī)學(xué)術(shù)交流會(huì)論文摘要集[C];2000年

5 黃穎宏;夏明天;;淺談刑事案件中法醫(yī)學(xué)鑒定體制[A];中國(guó)法醫(yī)學(xué)會(huì)全國(guó)第十次法醫(yī)臨床學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)研討會(huì)論文集[C];2007年

6 李，

本文編號(hào)：2199284