本文選題：“群體性事件” + 憲政��； 參考：《河南大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：當(dāng)前我國(guó)正處于社會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)型期,利益的多元化和觀(guān)念的雜糅,使得社會(huì)意識(shí)和結(jié)構(gòu)都處于一個(gè)相對(duì)多元化的階段。“群體性事件”正是在這一環(huán)境之下產(chǎn)生的社會(huì)現(xiàn)象,對(duì)于“群體性事件”需要一個(gè)理性的分析和認(rèn)識(shí),不能簡(jiǎn)單地歸類(lèi)為社會(huì)治安事件。其背后所蘊(yùn)含的是民眾對(duì)于政府和法律的認(rèn)知態(tài)度,是一種對(duì)自身進(jìn)行維權(quán)的急切心理,更是一種憲政理念萌發(fā)的外在表現(xiàn)形式。 “群體性事件”作為我國(guó)當(dāng)前進(jìn)行的國(guó)家建設(shè)過(guò)程當(dāng)中一種不協(xié)調(diào)的聲音,一種潛在的不穩(wěn)定因素,已經(jīng)引起了黨和國(guó)家的高度關(guān)注。近年來(lái)中央政府通過(guò)積極地構(gòu)建相關(guān)應(yīng)對(duì)機(jī)制,將“群體性事件”納入到對(duì)基層政府和官員的問(wèn)責(zé)評(píng)價(jià)體系當(dāng)中,期望能夠遏制“群體性事件”的高發(fā)態(tài)勢(shì)。但值得關(guān)注的是,在這些制度的構(gòu)建過(guò)程當(dāng)中,還存在著一些不足和誤區(qū),結(jié)合我國(guó)憲政理念和國(guó)家管理模式,對(duì)“群體性事件”進(jìn)行理論分析,進(jìn)而對(duì)我國(guó)“群體性事件”的一種憲政主義法權(quán)解決思路進(jìn)行有益的思考,是本文試圖重點(diǎn)分析和探討的問(wèn)題。 本文首先從對(duì)國(guó)內(nèi)外專(zhuān)家學(xué)者關(guān)于“群體性事件”的不同概念進(jìn)行比較和分析入手,對(duì)我國(guó)“群體性事件”進(jìn)行界定,就目前我國(guó)所發(fā)生的“群體性事件”的特點(diǎn)進(jìn)行歸納和總結(jié)。以“湖北石首事件”為例,對(duì)“群體性事件”的產(chǎn)生原因進(jìn)行分析,形成對(duì)該類(lèi)事件的初步認(rèn)識(shí)。 其次,通過(guò)著力分析我國(guó)目前在“群體性事件”解決過(guò)程當(dāng)中存在的一些問(wèn)題和不足。如制度構(gòu)建上,缺乏相應(yīng)的法制意識(shí)和憲政意識(shí),應(yīng)對(duì)化解機(jī)制不健全,警力過(guò)分濫用等現(xiàn)象。主觀(guān)認(rèn)識(shí)上,存有將“群體性事件”簡(jiǎn)單的等同于上訪(fǎng)、鬧事的認(rèn)識(shí)誤區(qū)等。從憲政的角度,對(duì)“群體性事件”的現(xiàn)有解決模式進(jìn)行反思。 最后,就如何構(gòu)建起“群體性事件”的憲政解決模式,提出自己的建議。通過(guò)加快我國(guó)公民社會(huì)的成長(zhǎng)和發(fā)展,同時(shí)建立多元利益表達(dá)機(jī)制等,提高容納社會(huì)沖突的能力,有效緩解“群體性事件”對(duì)社會(huì)所帶來(lái)的巨大壓力,進(jìn)一步推動(dòng)我國(guó)憲政體系的完善和發(fā)展。 妥善處理“群體性事件”,對(duì)于我國(guó)的國(guó)家建設(shè)和社會(huì)穩(wěn)定有著很強(qiáng)的現(xiàn)實(shí)意義。加強(qiáng)對(duì)“群體性事件”問(wèn)題的分析與認(rèn)識(shí),對(duì)推進(jìn)我國(guó)政治體制改革,建立健全體現(xiàn)民主和憲政精神的政治管理體制都將大有裨益。
[Abstract]:At present, our country is in the period of social transformation, the diversification of interests and the mixture of ideas make the social consciousness and structure in a relatively pluralistic stage. It is precisely under this environment that "mass events" arise social phenomena. "group events" need a rational analysis and understanding, and can not be simply classified as social security events. Behind it is the cognitive attitude of the public to the government and the law. It is a kind of anxious psychology to protect the rights of oneself, and it is also an external manifestation of the germination of the constitutional idea. As a kind of uncoordinated voice and a potential unstable factor in the process of national construction in China, "group incident" has aroused great concern of the Party and the country. In recent years, the central government has actively set up relevant coping mechanisms to bring "mass incidents" into the accountability evaluation system of grass-roots governments and officials, hoping to contain the high incidence of "group incidents". However, in the process of constructing these systems, there are still some shortcomings and misunderstandings. Combined with the concept of constitutionalism and the mode of national management, this paper makes a theoretical analysis of "mass events". Furthermore, it is an important problem that this paper tries to analyze and discuss, which is a kind of thought of solving constitutional right of law of "group event" in our country. This paper begins with the comparison and analysis of the different concepts of "group events" between domestic and foreign experts and scholars, and defines "group events" in China. This paper sums up and summarizes the characteristics of mass events in China. Taking "Shishou event in Hubei Province" as an example, this paper analyzes the causes of "group event" and forms a preliminary understanding of this kind of event. Secondly, some problems and shortcomings in the process of solving group incidents are analyzed. Such as system construction, lack of corresponding consciousness of legal system and constitutionalism, dealing with the phenomenon of imperfect mechanism and excessive abuse of police force, etc. Subjective understanding, there are "mass incidents" simply equated with petition, trouble, misunderstanding and so on. From the angle of constitutionalism, this paper reflects on the existing solution mode of "group event". Finally, the author puts forward his own suggestions on how to construct the constitutional settlement mode of "group event". By speeding up the growth and development of civil society in China and establishing the mechanism of expression of multiple interests, we can improve the ability to accommodate social conflicts, and effectively alleviate the enormous pressure brought by "mass incidents" to society. Further promote the improvement and development of China's constitutional system. It is of great practical significance for China's national construction and social stability to deal with group incidents properly. Strengthening the analysis and understanding of the problem of "group events" will be of great benefit to promoting the reform of our political system and establishing and perfecting the political management system which embodies the spirit of democracy and constitutionalism.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：河南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D631.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陳俊珂;日本和新加坡學(xué)校德育特色之比較[J];比較教育研究;2002年12期

2 于建嶸;蔡永飛;;縣政改革是中國(guó)改革新的突破口[J];東南學(xué)術(shù);2008年01期

3 于建嶸;;共治威權(quán)與法治威權(quán)——中國(guó)政治發(fā)展的問(wèn)題和出路[J];當(dāng)代世界社會(huì)主義問(wèn)題;2008年04期

4 范明;中外“群體性事件”問(wèn)題比較研究[J];中國(guó)人民公安大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2003年01期

5 孫正;組織化群體:關(guān)于群體性事件參與者的基本分析[J];中國(guó)人民公安大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2004年05期

6 周忠偉;;2008—2009年中國(guó)群體性事件分析[J];中國(guó)人民公安大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年03期

7 劉亞靜;;群體性事件相關(guān)概念之界定[J];河北公安警察職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年03期

8 于建嶸;;中國(guó)縣政改革的目標(biāo)和基本路徑[J];甘肅理論學(xué)刊;2008年04期

9 王彩元;中外群體性治安事件之比較[J];廣西公安管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2003年03期

10 曲連波,王頂恩;論我國(guó)民主政治建設(shè)中的公民素質(zhì)[J];東北林業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);1989年S1期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前2條

1 山西省定襄縣縣長(zhǎng) 賈玉文;[N];人民日?qǐng)?bào);2010年

2 ;[N];人民日?qǐng)?bào);2011年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 武卉昕;中俄公民素質(zhì)教育的比較分析[D];哈爾濱工程大學(xué);2004年

2 王連義;公民教育的政治取向研究[D];東北師范大學(xué);2006年

3 孫雪玲;農(nóng)村群體性事件的成因及對(duì)策[D];山東師范大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號(hào)：2073354