本文選題：筆跡鑒定 + 鑒定程序　； 參考：《湖南師范大學(xué)》2008年碩士論文

【摘要】： 全國人民代表大會(huì)常務(wù)委員會(huì)《關(guān)于司法鑒定管理問題的決定》,已于2005年10月1日正式實(shí)施,為我國司法鑒定的發(fā)展掀開了嶄新的一頁。這一決定對(duì)目前鑒定機(jī)構(gòu)和鑒定人管理有著重要的規(guī)范作用,但對(duì)鑒定程序規(guī)定較少,較為原則。我國三大訴訟法對(duì)鑒定程序的規(guī)定也是較為簡單、不明確,這使司法鑒定的日常程序性工作缺乏相應(yīng)的依據(jù)。僅有《決定》不可能全面解決當(dāng)前司法實(shí)踐中有關(guān)鑒定的問題,鑒定制度改革應(yīng)和訴訟體制改革保持同步,將其與訴訟法的修改和證據(jù)規(guī)則的制定結(jié)合起來通盤考慮。目前三大訴訟法都在進(jìn)行修改,怎樣運(yùn)用訴訟程序來規(guī)范與鑒定有關(guān)的活動(dòng),保證鑒定結(jié)論的可靠性,保障司法的公正性,是一個(gè)值得深入研究的問題,也是司法鑒定立法的當(dāng)務(wù)之急。筆者以筆跡鑒定為考察視角通過對(duì)外委托筆跡鑒定工作實(shí)踐中遇到筆跡鑒定程序的啟動(dòng)、樣本客觀地收集、鑒定機(jī)構(gòu)的選擇、鑒定結(jié)論的審核認(rèn)定及沖突結(jié)論的采信、是否需要建立筆跡鑒定結(jié)論的復(fù)核機(jī)構(gòu)等問題,結(jié)合當(dāng)前法律法規(guī)中存在的不足與缺陷,對(duì)司法鑒定的程序進(jìn)行深入研究,提出合理法建議,有利于鑒定結(jié)論的客觀真實(shí),有利于保護(hù)當(dāng)事人的合法權(quán)利,使我國混亂的鑒定秩序得到進(jìn)一步規(guī)范。
[Abstract]:The decision of the standing Committee of the National people's Congress on the Administration of Judicial expertise, which was formally implemented on October 1, 2005, has opened a new page for the development of judicial expertise in China. This decision has an important normative effect on the current appraisal organization and expert management, but it has less stipulation and principle to the appraisal procedure. The provisions of the three major procedural laws on the identification procedure are also relatively simple and unclear, which makes the daily procedural work of judicial expertise lack the corresponding basis. Only the decision can not solve the problem of appraisal in the current judicial practice. The reform of appraisal system should keep pace with the reform of litigation system and combine it with the revision of procedural law and the formulation of evidence rules. At present, the three major procedural laws are under revision. How to use the litigation procedure to regulate the activities related to the appraisal, to ensure the reliability of the appraisal conclusions and to ensure the impartiality of the judiciary is a problem worth further study. It is also the urgent matter of judicial expertise legislation. From the perspective of handwriting identification, the author encountered the initiation of handwriting identification procedure, the objective collection of samples, the selection of appraisal institutions, the verification and determination of appraisal conclusions and the adoption of conflicting conclusions in the practice of entrusted handwriting identification. Whether it is necessary to set up a review organization for handwriting identification conclusion, combining with the shortcomings and defects in current laws and regulations, to make a thorough study on the procedure of judicial identification, and to put forward reasonable legal suggestions, which is conducive to the objective and true conclusion of the appraisal. It helps to protect the legal rights of the parties and further standardize the chaotic appraisal order in our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2008
【分類號(hào)】：D918.9

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王素芳;;論重新鑒定的規(guī)范[J];人民論壇;2011年23期

2 楊建毅;李明革;王慧;趙宏偉;;基于多特征提取算法融合的筆跡鑒定[J];才智;2011年17期

3 張超;;筆跡鑒定中的“漏筆畫現(xiàn)象”淺析[J];吉林公安高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2011年03期

4 張新寶;;人身損害鑒定制度的重構(gòu)[J];中國法學(xué);2011年04期

5 門金玲;;論命案強(qiáng)制鑒定制度的建構(gòu)——以預(yù)防偵查錯(cuò)誤為視角[J];山東警察學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年04期

6 陳德武;;論《醫(yī)療事故處理?xiàng)l例》的立法缺陷[J];華夏星火;2005年02期

7 王桂s，

本文編號(hào)：2058573