本文選題：社區(qū)矯正 + 存在問題��； 參考：《華南理工大學》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：社區(qū)矯正制度研究是當前我國政治生活及法學研究領域的一個新興課題,是中國司法制度改革的重要組成部分。廣州2006年啟動社區(qū)矯正試點以來,矯正工作取得了一定成績,為維護當?shù)厣鐣�(wěn)定、防止五類罪犯重新犯罪作出了貢獻。但是,社區(qū)矯正作為新生事物在實踐中存在這樣那樣的問題仍需完善。本文從社區(qū)矯正的利弊著手分析,以本土案例為著眼點,深入剖析廣州社區(qū)矯正存在的主要問題。這些問題包括法律依據(jù)缺乏、執(zhí)行主體不一致、隊伍專業(yè)性不強、“人戶分離”現(xiàn)象較嚴重、未成年犯社區(qū)矯正手段單一、人身危險性評估仍未起步等六個方面,有些問題是廣州特有的,有些問題帶有全國普遍性。 結合廣州實際,本文提出了完善立法、建立社區(qū)矯正專業(yè)化隊伍、人戶分離服刑人員的監(jiān)管、全面啟動人身危險性評估和完善青少年社區(qū)矯正五方面對策。立法完善方面主要是要在修改刑法等配套法律的基礎上,出臺專門的社區(qū)矯正法,對社區(qū)矯正法律性質和執(zhí)行程序進行明確和規(guī)范。隊伍專業(yè)化主要是建立專門的社區(qū)矯正官。解決人戶分離問題主要是加強戶籍地和居住地聯(lián)動合作的問題。廣州需全面啟動人身危險性評估,本人對評估的定量分析進行了具體闡述。
[Abstract]:The study of community correction system is a new issue in the field of political life and legal research in China. It is an important part of the reform of China's judicial system. Since Guangzhou started the pilot of community correction in 2006, the correction work has made certain achievements, which has contributed to the maintenance of local social stability and the prevention of the re crime of the five types of criminals. The community correction as a new thing in practice still needs to be improved. This article analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of the community correction, taking the local cases as the eye point, and deeply analyzes the main problems of the community correction in Guangzhou. These problems include the lack of legal basis, the inconsistency of the executive body, the poor professionalism of the team, and the "human household". The phenomenon of "separation" is more serious, the means of community correction for juvenile offenders is single, and the assessment of personal danger is still not started in six aspects. Some problems are unique in Guangzhou and some problems are universal in China.
Combined with the reality of Guangzhou, this paper puts forward the five aspects of perfecting the legislation, establishing the professional team of community correction, the supervision of the separation of the prisoners by the people, starting the personal danger assessment and improving the community correction of the young people. The main part of the legislation is to introduce a special community correction law on the basis of modifying the law of the matching of criminal law and other laws. The legal nature and implementation procedures of community correction are clarified and standardized. The specialization of the team is mainly to establish a special community correctional officer. To solve the problem of household separation, the main problem is to strengthen the joint cooperation between the household register and the residence. Guangzhou needs to start the assessment of personal danger in an all-round way, and I elaborate the quantitative analysis of the assessment.
【學位授予單位】：華南理工大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D926.8

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 湯嘯天;社區(qū)矯正試點與矯正質量的提高[J];當代法學;2004年04期

2 王玨;關于社區(qū)矯正試點工作的幾點思考[J];中國司法;2004年01期

3 吳宗憲;關于社區(qū)矯正若干問題思考[J];中國司法;2004年07期

4 姚琦;;我國社區(qū)矯正的立法展望[J];湖北社會科學;2007年07期

5 上海市再犯預測量表研究課題組;刑釋人員再犯預測量表的研制[J];福建公安高等�？茖W校學報.社會公共安全研究;1999年04期

6 康樹華;社區(qū)矯正的歷史、現(xiàn)狀與重大理論價值[J];法學雜志;2003年05期

7 屈耀倫;;關于我國社區(qū)矯正制度的若干思考[J];法學;2006年10期

8 王順安,甄宏;試論我國未成年犯社區(qū)矯正項目體系之構建[J];青少年犯罪問題;2005年01期

9 劉東根;;公安機關與社區(qū)矯正——兼論社區(qū)矯正執(zhí)行機構的構建[J];中國人民公安大學學報(社會科學版);2006年03期

10 吳宗憲;恢復性司法述評[J];江蘇公安專科學校學報;2002年03期

，

本文編號：2016193