本文選題：誘惑偵查 + 價(jià)值意義�。� 參考：《山東大學(xué)》2010年碩士論文

【摘要】：當(dāng)前,我國(guó)正處于社會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)型期,各種矛盾頻發(fā),刑事案件數(shù)量呈逐年上升的趨勢(shì)。尤其是一些毒品、武器非法交易以及涉及國(guó)家安全、職業(yè)性或團(tuán)伙性的重大案件時(shí)有發(fā)生。這些案件往往極具隱蔽化、智能化,傳統(tǒng)的偵查手段已經(jīng)不能適應(yīng)打擊犯罪的要求。而誘惑偵查制度以其特有的主動(dòng)性、誘惑性、秘密性特點(diǎn),在實(shí)踐中逐步被我國(guó)偵查機(jī)關(guān)所認(rèn)可,在實(shí)踐中取得了較好的效果。然而,令人尷尬的是盡管誘惑偵查在我國(guó)偵查實(shí)踐中已經(jīng)廣泛應(yīng)用,但在刑事訴訟法等基本法中卻無(wú)明文規(guī)定。由于實(shí)踐中,誘惑偵查沒有得到很好的規(guī)制,導(dǎo)致侵犯人權(quán)的事件時(shí)有發(fā)生,可見,構(gòu)建我國(guó)的誘惑偵查體制已經(jīng)成為一個(gè)迫在眉睫的問(wèn)題。本文以我國(guó)誘惑偵查的法律規(guī)制為主線,圍繞誘惑偵查的價(jià)值意義問(wèn)題、誘惑偵查的法律規(guī)制措施這兩大核心,共分五部分展開研究。 文章的第一部分對(duì)誘惑偵查的基本理論進(jìn)行分析。首先對(duì)于誘惑偵查的概念進(jìn)行界定,明確本文所研究的誘惑偵查應(yīng)該局限于機(jī)會(huì)提供型這種情況,而不包括誘發(fā)犯罪意圖型。在此基礎(chǔ)上對(duì)于誘惑偵查的特征進(jìn)行分析,指出其與傳統(tǒng)的偵查手段的不同之處。然后,文章對(duì)誘惑偵查與警察圈套、臥底偵查、特情偵查三組概念進(jìn)行辨析,更加深入地認(rèn)識(shí)誘惑偵查這一偵查方法。 文章的第二部分對(duì)誘惑偵查的價(jià)值意義進(jìn)行分析。首先指出其積極價(jià)值,即打擊犯罪、預(yù)防犯罪。其次,分析其消極價(jià)值,即可能對(duì)公民權(quán)利造成侵犯；違反了刑法的罪責(zé)自負(fù)原則；破壞社會(huì)誠(chéng)信價(jià)值觀念等。在此基礎(chǔ)上,筆者對(duì)此進(jìn)行分析,指出了僅僅看到積極價(jià)值或消極價(jià)值都是片面的,而應(yīng)當(dāng)辯證地一分為二地看待誘惑偵查的積極價(jià)值與消極價(jià)值,應(yīng)當(dāng)以長(zhǎng)遠(yuǎn)的、全面的眼光看待打擊犯罪與保障人權(quán)的矛盾。從法理和價(jià)值的角度來(lái)說(shuō),在嚴(yán)格規(guī)制的基礎(chǔ)上,建立誘惑偵查制度有其必要性。 文章的第三部分對(duì)國(guó)外誘惑偵查制度進(jìn)行比較考察。主要選取典型國(guó)家對(duì)英美法系國(guó)家的誘惑偵查制度與大陸法系國(guó)家的誘惑偵查制度進(jìn)行比較分析,目的是為我國(guó)誘惑偵查制度的構(gòu)建提供理論和實(shí)踐的依據(jù)。 文章的第四部分對(duì)我國(guó)誘惑偵查的現(xiàn)狀及問(wèn)題進(jìn)行分析,首先對(duì)我國(guó)誘惑偵查的現(xiàn)狀及其所存在的問(wèn)題作出分析,其問(wèn)題包括定義模糊、立法缺失、相應(yīng)配套制度的缺失。在此基礎(chǔ)上對(duì)我國(guó)誘惑偵查基本態(tài)度進(jìn)行了探討。論證了我國(guó)建立誘惑偵查制度的必要性和可能性。 文章的第五部分是文章的重點(diǎn),主要論述了誘惑偵查的法律規(guī)制問(wèn)題。首先對(duì)于誘惑偵查制度的具體建議進(jìn)行論述,主要包括誘惑偵查的基本原則、立法模式、適用條件、程序控制、救濟(jì)措施。其次,對(duì)我國(guó)誘惑偵查制度的配套措施進(jìn)行論述,主要包括非法證據(jù)排除制度和警察出庭作證制度。 筆者希望通過(guò)對(duì)于誘惑偵查制度的嚴(yán)格規(guī)制,使其能夠在合法的范圍內(nèi)發(fā)揮它的積極作用,從而促進(jìn)國(guó)家對(duì)犯罪的有效打擊,最大限度保護(hù)人權(quán),推進(jìn)中國(guó)法治化的進(jìn)程!
[Abstract]:At present, our country is in the period of social transformation, with various contradictions occurring frequently, the number of criminal cases is increasing year by year. In particular, some drugs, illegal arms transactions and major cases involving national security, professional or Gang nature have occurred. These cases are often extremely concealed, intelligent, and the traditional means of investigation have not been adapted. The temptation investigation system, with its unique initiative, seductive and secret characteristics, has been gradually recognized by the investigative organs of our country in practice and has achieved good results in practice. However, it is embarrassing that although the temptation investigation has been widely used in the investigation practice of our country, the basic law of criminal procedure law and so on. In practice, the temptation investigation has not been well regulated in practice, which leads to the occurrence of violations of human rights. It is obvious that the construction of the enticement detection system in our country has become an urgent problem. This article takes the legal regulation of temptation investigation in our country as the main line, focusing on the value and significance of the temptation investigation, and the temptation detection. The two core elements of legal regulation are five parts.
The first part of the article analyzes the basic theory of the temptation investigation. First, it defines the concept of the temptation investigation. It is clear that the temptation investigation in this paper should be limited to the situation of opportunity offering, but not the type of inducing criminal intent. On this basis, the characteristics of temptation investigation are analyzed, and it is pointed out that it and the traditional one. Then, the article analyzes the three concepts of the enticement investigation and the police trap, the undercover investigation and the special investigation, and more deeply understanding the investigation method of the temptation investigation.
The second part of the article analyzes the value and significance of the temptation investigation. First, it points out its positive value, that is, to combat crime and prevent crime. Secondly, it analyzes its negative value, that is, it may cause infringement on civil rights, violates the principle of the self negative responsibility of criminal responsibility in criminal law, and destroys the values of social honesty and credit. On this basis, the author divides it into a point. It is pointed out that only the positive and negative values are one-sided, but the positive and negative values of the enticement investigation should be viewed dialectically. The contradiction between the fight against crime and the protection of human rights should be viewed in a long-term and comprehensive view. On the basis of the strict regulation, it is necessary to establish the lure on the basis of strict regulation. The system of confusion and investigation has its necessity.
The third part of the article makes a comparative study of the foreign temptation investigation system. It mainly selects the typical countries to compare the temptation investigation system of the Anglo American legal system and the continental law countries. The purpose is to provide the theoretical and practical basis for the construction of the enticement investigation system in our country.
The fourth part of the article analyzes the present situation and problems of the enticement investigation in our country. First, it analyzes the present situation and the existing problems of the temptation investigation in our country. The problems include the ambiguity of definition, the lack of legislation and the lack of corresponding supporting system. On this basis, the basic attitude of temptation investigation in China is discussed. The necessity and possibility of enticing the system of investigation.
The fifth part of the article is the focus of the article, mainly discussing the legal regulation of the temptation investigation. First, it discusses the specific suggestions of the temptation investigation system, mainly including the basic principles of the temptation investigation, the legislative model, the applicable conditions, the procedure control, and the relief measures. It mainly includes the exclusionary system of illegal evidence and the system of police appearing in court to testify.
I hope that through the strict regulation of the temptation investigation system, it can make it play its positive role in the legal scope, so as to promote the effective attack of the state on crime, protect human rights and promote the process of the rule of law in China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號(hào)】：D925.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 許文山;翁佳黎;;誘惑偵查適用新探[J];福建公安高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2005年06期

2 馬躍;美、日有關(guān)誘惑偵查的法理及論爭(zhēng)之概觀[J];法學(xué);1998年11期

3 張凱;我國(guó)誘惑偵查相關(guān)制度的反思與規(guī)制[J];中國(guó)人民公安大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2005年01期

4 史榮華;徐公社;;關(guān)于臥底偵查法律規(guī)制的思考[J];中國(guó)人民公安大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2005年06期

5 劉之雄;誘惑偵查中的幾個(gè)法律問(wèn)題[J];湖北公安高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2000年02期

6 王平;;誘惑偵查的法律規(guī)制[J];蘭州大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年01期

7 李永紅;對(duì)一起販賣毒品案適用法律的評(píng)析——兼論偵查陷阱的法律規(guī)制[J];人民檢察;2001年01期

8 龍宗智;誘惑偵查合法性問(wèn)題探析[J];人民司法;2000年05期

9 王超;誘惑偵查的是與非[J];山東公安�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2002年03期

10 何家弘,劉為軍;圈套、誠(chéng)信與偵查法治[J];山東公安�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2003年06期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 金星;論誘惑偵查[D];吉林大學(xué);2004年

2 楊志剛;誘惑偵查研究[D];四川大學(xué);2007年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 王劍虹;誘惑偵查研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2003年

2 秦紅;論誘惑偵查[D];四川大學(xué);2005年

3 何小華;誘惑偵查研究[D];湘潭大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號(hào)：1994715