本文選題：偵訊 + 證據(jù)��； 參考：《上海公安高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào)》2003年05期

【摘要】：社會規(guī)范對人都有心理壓力,法律規(guī)范與強(qiáng)制力量同在,心理強(qiáng)制是法律性對話的本性。偵訊對話往往以強(qiáng)制措施為外在的條件,而證據(jù)才是其內(nèi)在強(qiáng)制力的根據(jù)。涉案當(dāng)事人的沉默,并沒有使偵訊失去強(qiáng)制性,也沒有失去其取證功能。偵訊對涉案當(dāng)事人心理強(qiáng)制方的大小,在于警方掌握證據(jù)的狀況;對偵查人員來說,關(guān)鍵在其偵訊對策的運(yùn)籌和實(shí)施。
[Abstract]:Social norms have psychological pressure on people, legal norms and coercive forces exist, psychological compulsion is the nature of legal dialogue. Coercive measures are often taken as external conditions for interrogation and dialogue, and evidence is the basis of its internal compulsion. The silence of the parties involved did not make the investigation compulsory, nor did it lose its function of gathering evidence. The size of the psychological compulsion of the parties involved in the investigation lies in the condition of the police mastering the evidence, and for the investigators, the key lies in the operation and implementation of their interrogation countermeasures.
【作者單位】： 四川警官高等�？茖W(xué)校
【分類號】：D918.5

【共引文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 陳聞高;論偵訊對話中的心理強(qiáng)制[J];中國人民公安大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2003年06期

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 宋建;;糾正起訴書中法律術(shù)語的常見錯誤[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);1983年04期

2 文有仁;波蘭審理神甫遇害案[J];w，

本文編號：1965374