本文選題：侵犯知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)犯罪 + 追訴乏力�。� 參考：《湘潭大學(xué)》2006年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著經(jīng)濟(jì)全球化的快步推進(jìn),國際交往的日益密切,知識(shí)經(jīng)濟(jì)時(shí)代的霍然來臨,知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的重要性無可爭議地凸現(xiàn)出來。保護(hù)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)已經(jīng)成為提高國家競爭力的重要內(nèi)容,成為當(dāng)今世界的潮流。 我國對(duì)于知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的保護(hù),包括司法保護(hù)與行政保護(hù)兩種方式。但就現(xiàn)狀而言,我國對(duì)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的保護(hù)卻未達(dá)到應(yīng)有的高度,尤其是對(duì)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的刑事保護(hù)明顯缺乏力度,實(shí)踐中普遍存在知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)行政保護(hù)強(qiáng)于刑事保護(hù)的情況,很多應(yīng)當(dāng)構(gòu)成知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)犯罪的行為沒有依法受到追訴。這與現(xiàn)實(shí)領(lǐng)域發(fā)生的大量知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)違法案件,以及知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)對(duì)于社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)的貢獻(xiàn)相比而言,是極不相稱的。其一大后果就是知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)違法行為愈演愈烈,嚴(yán)重侵害了知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)所有人的合法利益。知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)不力甚至已經(jīng)成為我國融入世界經(jīng)濟(jì)潮流的一大羈絆。究其原因,主要有二:一方面,某些知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)行政管理機(jī)關(guān)對(duì)于應(yīng)當(dāng)構(gòu)成犯罪的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)違法行為沒有依法進(jìn)行移送,“以罰代刑”情況嚴(yán)重。另一方面,有關(guān)司法機(jī)關(guān)對(duì)于知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)犯罪偏好降格處理,能判不判,重罪輕判。其深層次的原因與知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)行政執(zhí)法機(jī)關(guān)的財(cái)政缺乏保障、有關(guān)部門的監(jiān)督不力、立法體系的疏漏、知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)刑事保護(hù)的意識(shí)薄弱因素等密切相關(guān)。 因此,要從根本上解決侵犯知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)犯罪刑事追訴乏力這一問題,就要更新觀念,重視對(duì)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的刑事保護(hù),堅(jiān)決打擊行政執(zhí)法機(jī)關(guān)的“以罰代刑”等不法行為,對(duì)構(gòu)成知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)犯罪的行為應(yīng)依法予以追究。只有這樣,才能最大程度地打擊知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)犯罪人的囂張氣焰,從而更好地保護(hù)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)所有人的利益,為建設(shè)創(chuàng)新型國家貢獻(xiàn)應(yīng)有的力量。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of economic globalization and the increasingly close international contacts, the importance of intellectual property rights has emerged indisputably in the coming era of knowledge economy. The protection of intellectual property rights has become an important part of improving national competitiveness and the trend of the world today. The protection of intellectual property in our country includes judicial protection and administrative protection. However, as far as the present situation is concerned, the protection of intellectual property in our country has not reached its due height, especially the criminal protection of intellectual property is obviously lacking in strength. In practice, the administrative protection of intellectual property is generally stronger than that of criminal protection. Many acts that should constitute intellectual property crimes have not been prosecuted according to law. This is not commensurate with the large number of intellectual property violation cases and the contribution of intellectual property rights to social economy. One of its major consequences is that intellectual property rights violations become more and more serious, which seriously infringes the legitimate interests of intellectual property owners. Weak protection of intellectual property rights has even become a major fetters of China's integration into the world economic trend. There are two main reasons: on the one hand, some intellectual property administrative organs have not transferred the intellectual property illegal acts which should constitute a crime according to the law, and the situation of "substitute punishment with punishment" is serious. On the other hand, the judicial authorities tend to reduce their preference for intellectual property crimes, and can sentence no or felony. The deep reasons are closely related to the lack of financial protection of the administrative law enforcement agencies of intellectual property rights, the weak supervision of relevant departments, the omission of the legislative system, the weak awareness of criminal protection of intellectual property rights, and so on. Therefore, in order to fundamentally solve the problem of weak criminal prosecution for crimes against intellectual property rights, it is necessary to renew the concept, attach importance to the criminal protection of intellectual property rights, and resolutely crack down on illegal acts such as "punishment instead of punishment" by administrative law enforcement agencies. Any act constituting an intellectual property crime shall be investigated according to law. Only in this way can we strike at the arrogance of intellectual property offenders to the greatest extent, thus better protect the interests of intellectual property owners and contribute to the building of an innovative country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湘潭大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2006
【分類號(hào)】：D917;D924.3

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 蒲江濤;;論民事訴訟中的調(diào)解與地方保護(hù)主義[J];理論導(dǎo)報(bào);2010年10期

，

本文編號(hào)：1886428