本文選題：司法鑒定 + 標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化��； 參考：《河北大學(xué)》2006年碩士論文

【摘要】：伴隨著自然科學(xué)的迅猛發(fā)展，鑒定結(jié)論在訴訟過(guò)程中的作用日益突出，，正逐漸發(fā)展成為法官認(rèn)定案件事實(shí)的必備手段。鑒定結(jié)論作為一種獨(dú)立的、特殊的證據(jù)形式，是人民法院借以查明案件事實(shí)、認(rèn)定案件性質(zhì)的重要依據(jù)，對(duì)于準(zhǔn)確的定罪量刑、保證辦案質(zhì)量、避免冤假錯(cuò)案有著十分重要的作用。然而，由于目前我國(guó)司法鑒定實(shí)踐中存在的突出問(wèn)題，致使鑒定結(jié)論的科學(xué)性、客觀性、公正性受到了一定程度的影響，這不僅增加了辦案的難度，干擾了司法活動(dòng)的正常進(jìn)行，而且使司法鑒定結(jié)論的公信力受到嚴(yán)重的損害。如何提升司法鑒定的公信力，成為司法鑒定領(lǐng)域目前不得不面對(duì)的首要問(wèn)題之一。本文是在有關(guān)學(xué)者思想的啟發(fā)之下，參考國(guó)外現(xiàn)有做法，提出以實(shí)現(xiàn)司法鑒定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化為目標(biāo)，推行司法鑒定行業(yè)管理，確立司法鑒定的質(zhì)量保障體系，用以提升司法鑒定行業(yè)威信和鑒定結(jié)論的公信力。 文中首先對(duì)司法鑒定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化的基本內(nèi)涵進(jìn)行了闡釋，認(rèn)為司法鑒定行業(yè)發(fā)展中司法鑒定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化具有公正、效率和秩序三個(gè)方面的重要理論價(jià)值。其次，從科學(xué)技術(shù)的發(fā)展、司法鑒定行業(yè)自律和與國(guó)際接軌的需要、審判實(shí)踐的需要三個(gè)角度闡明了在我國(guó)實(shí)行司法鑒定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化之必要性；并在闡明我國(guó)司法鑒定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)設(shè)立現(xiàn)狀的基礎(chǔ)上，著重對(duì)司法鑒定現(xiàn)有標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的缺陷問(wèn)題進(jìn)行了分析。最后，在比較兩大法系司法鑒定體制的基礎(chǔ)上，詳細(xì)地闡明了英國(guó)、美國(guó)、澳大利亞、日本等國(guó)司法鑒定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)設(shè)立的情況，并作了簡(jiǎn)單的分析；提出了在我國(guó)司法鑒定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化進(jìn)程中應(yīng)嚴(yán)格遵循客觀性、質(zhì)量控制、科學(xué)性、可采性、慎重和統(tǒng)一等原則。在此基礎(chǔ)上筆者提出構(gòu)建我國(guó)司法鑒定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)應(yīng)有的體系，指出我國(guó)司法鑒定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化的實(shí)現(xiàn)條件和步驟，并對(duì)司法鑒定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化實(shí)現(xiàn)過(guò)程中的關(guān)注點(diǎn)進(jìn)行了分析闡述。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of natural science, the role of the appraisal conclusion in the litigation process is increasingly prominent, and is gradually becoming a necessary means for judges to determine the facts of the case. As an independent and special form of evidence, the appraisal conclusion is an important basis for the people's court to find out the facts of the case and determine the nature of the case. It is very important to avoid false and wrong cases. However, due to the outstanding problems existing in the practice of judicial expertise in our country, the scientific, objective and impartial conclusions of the appraisal are affected to a certain extent, which not only increases the difficulty of handling the case, It interferes with the normal conduct of judicial activities and seriously damages the credibility of judicial expertise. How to improve the credibility of judicial expertise has become one of the most important problems in the field of judicial expertise. Inspired by the thoughts of relevant scholars and referring to the existing practices of foreign countries, this paper puts forward the goal of realizing the standardization of judicial expertise, promoting the management of judicial expertise industry, and establishing the quality assurance system of judicial expertise. In order to enhance the credibility of the judicial expertise industry and expertise conclusions. This paper first explains the basic connotation of the standardization of judicial expertise, and holds that the standardization of judicial expertise in the development of forensic expertise industry has important theoretical value in three aspects: fairness, efficiency and order. Secondly, from the development of science and technology, the need of self-discipline of forensic expertise industry and the need to connect with the world, and the need of trial practice, this paper expounds the necessity of carrying out the standardization of judicial expertise in our country. On the basis of expounding the current situation of the establishment of judicial expertise standards in China, the defects of the existing standards are analyzed. Finally, on the basis of comparing the judicial identification system between the two legal systems, this paper expounds in detail the establishment of the judicial identification standards in Britain, the United States, Australia, Japan and other countries, and makes a simple analysis. The principles of objectivity, quality control, science, admissibility, prudence and unity should be strictly followed in the process of standardization of forensic expertise in China. On the basis of this, the author puts forward to construct the system of our country's judicial authentication standard, points out the conditions and steps to realize the standardization of judicial expertise in our country, and analyzes and expounds the attention in the process of realizing the standardization of judicial expertise.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：河北大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2006
【分類號(hào)】：D918.9

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王磊,郝曉s

本文編號(hào)：1798031