本文選題：司法鑒定 + 體制��； 參考：《華南理工大學(xué)》2010年碩士論文

【摘要】： 作為查清案件事實(shí)真相的一種客觀公正的科學(xué)手段——司法鑒定,在訴訟活動(dòng)中的作用和地位是越來(lái)越突出。司法鑒定的結(jié)論不僅關(guān)系到具體案件的判決,而且關(guān)系到整個(gè)社會(huì)司法公正的貫徹和踐行。而當(dāng)前我國(guó)司法鑒定制度中存在的缺陷嚴(yán)重影響了司法公平、正義、效率價(jià)值理念的實(shí)現(xiàn)。因此,對(duì)司法鑒定制度的研究有著重要的價(jià)值和現(xiàn)實(shí)意義,建立一套系統(tǒng)科學(xué)、規(guī)范可行、公正高效的司法鑒定制度是當(dāng)務(wù)之急。筆者通過(guò)研究司法鑒定制度的基本概念、比較分析兩大法系司法鑒定制度之異同,并立足我國(guó)司法現(xiàn)狀,提出我國(guó)司法鑒定制度應(yīng)遵循的基本理念和建立統(tǒng)一的、復(fù)合型的司法鑒定人資格確認(rèn)制度,確保司法鑒定人的能力資質(zhì);將司法鑒定人定位于獨(dú)立的訴訟參與人,確保其中立性;建立“一元兩極”的司法鑒定體制和“當(dāng)事人參與基礎(chǔ)上的法官啟動(dòng)制”,在程序上保證鑒定人不受雙方當(dāng)事人的干擾,客觀公正的出具鑒定結(jié)論;重構(gòu)我國(guó)質(zhì)證程序,建立庭前鑒定結(jié)論開(kāi)示程序、建立鑒定人出庭作證制度、完善詢問(wèn)規(guī)則、建立“專家輔助人制度”,以保證有效的鑒別鑒定結(jié)論的真?zhèn)?使法官合理采信鑒定結(jié)論。建立起符合中國(guó)實(shí)際,適應(yīng)司法活動(dòng)需要的公正獨(dú)立、科學(xué)規(guī)范、結(jié)構(gòu)合理、職責(zé)清晰、管理有序、高效開(kāi)放的司法鑒定體制,制訂專門的《司法鑒定法》,是司法鑒定法治建設(shè)的最高目標(biāo)和奮斗方向。
[Abstract]:As an objective and fair scientific means to find out the truth of a case, judicial expertise plays an increasingly prominent role in litigation. The conclusion of judicial expertise is not only related to the judgment of specific cases, but also related to the implementation and practice of judicial justice in the whole society. However, the defects in the current judicial appraisal system have seriously affected the realization of the value concept of judicial fairness, justice and efficiency. Therefore, it is of great value and practical significance to study the system of judicial expertise. It is urgent to establish a system of scientific, normative and feasible, fair and efficient judicial identification system. By studying the basic concepts of judicial expertise system, the author compares and analyzes the similarities and differences between the two legal systems, and puts forward the basic concept and unified judicial appraisal system in our country based on the current situation of our country's judicature. The compound system of confirming the qualification of judicial connoisseur assures the qualification of the judge and assures the neutrality of the judge by positioning him as an independent participant in litigation. To establish a "unipolar" judicial appraisal system and a "judge initiation system based on the participation of the parties", to ensure that the authenticator will not be interfered with by both parties in the procedure, to objectively and fairly issue the appraisal conclusion, and to reconstruct our country's cross-examination procedure, In order to ensure the validity and validity of the expert conclusion, it is necessary to establish the procedure of the discovery of the conclusion before the court, the system of testifying in court, the rules of inquiry and the system of the expert assistant, so as to make the judge accept the conclusion reasonably. To establish a fair and independent, scientific and normative, rational structure, clear responsibility, orderly management and efficient and open judicial expertise system that conforms to China's reality and meets the needs of judicial activities, It is the highest goal and direction of the construction of the rule of law of judicial expertise to formulate a special judicial identification law.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華南理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號(hào)】：D918.9

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 楊郁娟;程序正義理念與司法鑒定制度重構(gòu)[J];中國(guó)司法鑒定;2005年05期

，

本文編號(hào)：1794699