本文選題：偵訊 + 程序��； 參考：《西南政法大學》2002年碩士論文

【摘要】： 本碩士論文約39，000字，由四章組成。 第一章是關(guān)于偵訊程序的基本特征和原則。作者首先分析了偵訊程序的含義，指出偵訊程序是偵查階段偵查機關(guān)按照一定的順序訊問犯罪嫌疑人的步驟和規(guī)則，目的是為了獲取犯罪嫌疑人的供述或辯解，并且指出偵訊和審訊、詢問有重大區(qū)別，從而界定了本文的研究范圍。通過對偵訊程序含義的分析，作者得出了偵訊程序的基本特征：對抗性、強迫性和偵訊結(jié)果——口供——的虛假可能性。由于口供具有可采性的前提是犯罪嫌疑人在自愿的情況下作出的，是自由意志和正常智力的產(chǎn)物，因此，作者在本章的第三部分提出：偵訊程序的基本原則是供述自愿性原則，并對供述自愿性原則的含義、理論基礎(chǔ)和評判標準作了深入分析。 第二章是關(guān)于偵訊程序的價值，作者從刑事訴訟最基本的價值目標——實體正義的實現(xiàn)、程序正義的實現(xiàn)和訴訟效率的提高——三個方面入手，分析了偵訊程序在刑事訴訟中的重要價值，指出由于偵訊程序具有印證和引導兩個方面的價值，因此有助于實體正義的實現(xiàn)和訴訟效率的提高。同時，由于偵訊程序符合程序公正的參與標準、程序人道性標準以及有利于形成合理的訴訟結(jié)構(gòu)，因此體現(xiàn)了程序正義。在本章的最后一部分，，作者提出，偵訊程序在以上三個方面的價值之間存在有沖突和矛盾，但由于偵訊結(jié)果在刑事司法上的重大利益，各國都在制度許可的范圍內(nèi)極力調(diào)和、平衡三種價值之間的沖突與矛盾，力圖在不妨礙犯罪嫌疑人主體地位的前提下，盡可能地追求偵訊程序在實現(xiàn)實體正義和提高訴訟效率兩方面的價值。 第三章是關(guān)于偵訊程序的基本規(guī)則。筆者通過比較分析的方法，考察了國外各法治國家為了保障犯罪嫌疑人供述的自愿性而共同確立并為國際文獻所認可的基本規(guī)則，這些規(guī)則包括訊問前的偵訊程序啟動規(guī)則、訊問中的對強迫性偵訊的抑制規(guī)則和偵訊程序終結(jié)后的侵權(quán)救濟規(guī)則。由于偵訊程序具有強迫性，因此各國都對偵訊程序的啟動條件進行了嚴格限制，一般要求滿足對犯罪嫌疑人進行了權(quán)利告知、犯罪嫌疑人自愿放棄了沉默權(quán)和律師到場三個條件后才能啟動偵訊程序。偵訊程序啟動后，為了防止偵查機關(guān)濫用權(quán)力，各法治國還制定了對強迫性偵訊的抑制規(guī)則，這包括對偵訊的時間、地點、方法的限制規(guī)則，對犯罪嫌疑人防御權(quán)的保障規(guī)則， 偵訊結(jié)果的固定規(guī)則，對犯罪嫌疑人人身檢查規(guī)則，對偵訊程序的司法控 制規(guī)則。為了在偵訊程序終結(jié)后還能繼續(xù)對偵訊程序進行司法控制，各國 還制定了侵權(quán)救濟規(guī)則，這主要是非法供述證據(jù)的排除規(guī)則。 最后一章是對中國偵訊程序規(guī)則的分析。首先，筆者分析了中國偵訊 程序規(guī)則的現(xiàn)狀及其缺陷，指出中國偵訊程序規(guī)則雖然基本饋按照供述 自愿性原則建立起來的，但和各法治國家普遍確立并為國際文獻所認可的 規(guī)則相比還有一定差距，并在制度設(shè)計上存在很多缺陷。然后，作者分析 了這種有缺陷的偵訊程序規(guī)則形成的原因，認為原因是多方面的，有司法 體制、經(jīng)濟狀況、法律意識、法律效力體系、價值觀等幾個方面的原因。 在本章的最后一部分，作者對怎樣完善中國的偵訊程序規(guī)則提出了自己的 設(shè)想，這主要是加強犯罪嫌疑人的權(quán)牙保障和對偵查機關(guān)的權(quán)力進行制約。
[Abstract]:The master's thesis is composed of about 39000 words and is composed of four chapters.
The first chapter is about the basic characteristics and principle of interrogation procedure in criminal investigation. The author first analyzes the meaning of the interrogation process, pointed out that the procedure of investigation and interrogation investigation stage of investigation organs in accordance with the rules and procedure in order to interrogate the criminal suspect certain, in order to obtain the suspect's testimony, and pointed out that the investigation and interrogation, ask to have significant differences. The definition of the scope of this study. Through the analysis of the meaning of the interrogation process, the author concludes the basic characteristics of the procedure of investigation and Interrogation: confrontational, coercive and its results may be false confession --. Because oral confession have the premise of admissibility is suspect in the case of voluntary made, is a product. Free will and normal intelligence so that the author in the third part of this chapter: the basic principle of the procedure of investigation and interrogation is the principle of voluntary confession, and the principle of voluntary confession The meaning, theoretical basis and evaluation criteria are analyzed in depth.
The second chapter is about the procedure value, the author from the fundamental values of criminal procedure -- the realization of substantive justice, procedural justice and improve litigation efficiency -- three aspects, analyzes the important value of the procedure in the criminal lawsuit, pointed out that due to the interrogation procedure has confirmed and guided two aspects the value, thus help to achieve substantive justice and improve litigation efficiency. At the same time, due to procedural justice in procedure of investigation and interrogation in accordance with standard procedures, humanitarian standards and is conducive to the formation of litigation structure reasonable, because of the procedural justice. In the last part of this chapter, the author puts forward, conflict and contradiction between the procedure in the above three aspects of the value, but because of the great interest in the interrogation of criminal judicial practice, countries have tried to reconcile within the permitted range in the system, balance three The conflict and contradiction between the value of the premise in order to suspect does not interfere with the main status, try to seek the interrogation process in the realization of justice and the two aspects of improving the efficiency of lawsuit value.
The third chapter is about the basic rules of the interrogation process. According to the comparative analysis, study abroad the country under the rule of law in order to protect the criminal suspect voluntary and jointly established basic rules and recognized by the international literature, these rules include the rules of procedure of investigation and interrogation interrogation start, remedy rule in interrogation rules of force inhibition of investigation and interrogation procedures after the end. Because it has forced the interrogation process, so all the countries on the procedure starting conditions were strictly limited, meet the general requirements of the suspect of the right to be informed, the suspect voluntarily give up the right to silence and to start the procedure of investigation and interrogation lawyer three conditions. After the interrogation program start later, in order to prevent the investigation organs abuse of power, the law also formulated the rules of restraining coercive interrogation, which includes the interrogation The rules for the limitation of time, place, method, and the protection of the defense of the criminal suspect,
The results of the fixed rules of interrogation and examination of suspect rules on the procedure of judicial control
In order to rule. At the end of the interrogation process was continued after the judicial control of the interrogation process, countries
The rule of tort relief is also formulated, which is mainly the rule of exclusionary rule for the evidence of illegal confession.
The last chapter is the analysis of the rules of procedure of investigation and interrogation China. First of all, the author analyzes the China.
The status quo and defects of the rules of procedure, Chinese pointed out that although the basic procedure of investigation and interrogation rules in accordance with the Fed statement
The principle of voluntariness is established, but it is universally established and recognised by international documents by countries under the rule of law.
There is a gap in the rules, and there are a lot of defects in the system design. Then, the author analyses
This is the reason of defect formation rules of procedure of investigation and interrogation, that for many reasons, judicial
The reasons for the system, the economic situation, the legal consciousness, the legal effect system, the values and so on.
In the last part of this chapter, the author on how to improve the rules of procedure of investigation and interrogation Chinese put forward their own
It is conceived that this is mainly to strengthen the right tooth protection of the criminal suspects and to restrict the power of the investigative organs.

【學位授予單位】：西南政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2002
【分類號】：D918.5

【引證文獻】

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前2條

1 唐銀梅;偵查訊問制度研究[D];西南交通大學;2009年

2 袁麗;論我國違法偵訊的司法救濟[D];西南政法大學;2010年

本文編號：1772748