本文選題：刑事司法鑒定　切入點(diǎn)：中立　出處：《南京師范大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：我國刑事司法鑒定制度近年來有了長足的發(fā)展,但是刑事司法鑒定的中立性仍然沒有得到充分的保障,為了完善我國刑事司法鑒定保障中立性制度,需要借鑒國外保障刑事司法鑒定中立的先進(jìn)經(jīng)驗(yàn),并針對我國保障刑事司法鑒定中立之不足,提出關(guān)于刑事司法鑒定主體獨(dú)立特別是有條件的“偵監(jiān)分離”、鑒定人資格完善、鑒定人責(zé)任等方面的優(yōu)化建議。 本文主體主要分為四個(gè)部分：刑事司法鑒定中立性的概述部分主要闡述了刑事司法鑒定中立性的概念和意義,并且界定了其基本內(nèi)容。我國刑事司法鑒定缺乏中立性的現(xiàn)狀及原因分析部分主要介紹了我國刑事司法鑒定中立性缺乏的表現(xiàn),并指出了導(dǎo)致這種現(xiàn)狀的根本原因。刑事訴訟鑒定中立性的保障機(jī)制之域外考察部分主要根據(jù)我國刑事司法鑒定缺乏中立性的現(xiàn)狀,對大陸法系國家和歐美法系國家保障刑事司法鑒定中立性的相關(guān)制度進(jìn)行考察,如刑事司法鑒定機(jī)構(gòu)的設(shè)置、鑒定人的管理,鑒定實(shí)施程序的規(guī)范、刑事司法鑒定主體的責(zé)任機(jī)制等,并在此基礎(chǔ)上作出了一定的利弊分析。最后,在分析我國刑事司法鑒定缺乏中立性的問題以及對域外的相關(guān)制度的參考的基礎(chǔ)上,對保障我國刑事司法鑒定中立性的相關(guān)制度提出完善的建議。主要包括刑事司法鑒定的主體設(shè)置和責(zé)任設(shè)置、鑒定實(shí)施程序的規(guī)范以及強(qiáng)化刑事司法鑒定的監(jiān)督等。
[Abstract]:In recent years, the criminal judicial identification system of our country has made great progress, but the neutrality of criminal judicial identification has not been fully protected. In order to perfect the neutral system of criminal judicial identification,It is necessary to draw lessons from the advanced experience of foreign countries to guarantee the neutrality of criminal judicial expertise, and in view of the deficiency of safeguarding the neutrality of criminal judicial expertise in our country, put forward the independence of the subject of criminal judicial identification, especially the conditional "separation of investigation and supervision", and perfect the qualification of experts.The optimization suggestion of appraiser responsibility etc.The main body of this paper is divided into four parts: the outline of the neutrality of criminal judicial identification mainly expounds the concept and significance of the neutrality of criminal judicial identification, and defines its basic content.The present situation and cause analysis of the lack of neutrality in criminal judicial identification in China mainly introduces the manifestation of the lack of neutrality in criminal judicial identification in China and points out the fundamental reasons leading to this situation.Based on the lack of neutrality in criminal judicial identification in China, this paper investigates the relevant systems of safeguarding the neutrality of criminal judicial identification in countries of continental law system and European and American legal system.Such as the setting up of the criminal judicial appraisal institution, the management of the expert, the standard of the appraisal procedure, the responsibility mechanism of the criminal judicial appraisal subject, and on the basis of which, the author makes a certain analysis of the advantages and disadvantages.Finally, on the basis of analyzing the lack of neutrality of criminal judicial identification in our country and the reference to the relevant system outside the country, the author puts forward some suggestions on how to ensure the neutrality of criminal judicial appraisal in our country.It mainly includes the subject setting and responsibility setting of criminal judicial identification, the standard of appraisal procedure and strengthening the supervision of criminal judicial identification.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D918.9

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 朱玉璋;國外司法鑒定制度[J];中國司法;2004年06期

2 郭華;;論司法鑒定統(tǒng)一管理的困境癥結(jié)及破解路向——以全國人大常委會《關(guān)于司法鑒定管理問題的決定》為中心[J];中國司法;2007年03期

3 彭小吉;;淺析鑒定意見的證據(jù)能力和證明力[J];福建法學(xué);2011年03期

4 趙杰;;論社會司法鑒定機(jī)構(gòu)的公益屬性[J];法學(xué)雜志;2007年06期

5 汪建成;;司法鑒定基礎(chǔ)理論研究[J];法學(xué)家;2009年04期

6 江雁飛;郭志遠(yuǎn);;司法鑒定之中立性問題研究[J];東華理工學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會科學(xué)版);2006年04期

7 王建華;論我國司法鑒定制度的完善[J];河北公安警察職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2003年04期

8 張方;從兩種鑒定類型的比較看我國司法鑒定委托權(quán)的歸屬[J];人民檢察;2000年07期

9 陳光中;鑒定機(jī)構(gòu)的中立性與制度改革[J];中國司法鑒定;2002年01期

10 孫業(yè)群;中外司法鑒定管理體制比較研究[J];中國司法鑒定;2004年01期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 董雪文;論司法鑒定的中立性[D];華東政法大學(xué);2011年

，

本文編號：1716711