本文選題：看守所　切入點(diǎn)：管理機(jī)制　出處：《西南交通大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：看守所的歷史發(fā)展過程是單向度的,過多地強(qiáng)調(diào)了對(duì)在押人員的看管、改造甚至是深挖犯罪、配合懲治犯罪,而人權(quán)保障的功能并未得到彰顯,這與我國(guó)法制建設(shè)的歷史進(jìn)程發(fā)展全局是緊密相關(guān)的。在當(dāng)時(shí)的歷史條件下,看守所的功能定位、管理體制以及具體的制度很難具備現(xiàn)代法治的要素。然而,伴隨著依法治國(guó)方略的提出及其貫徹進(jìn)程,看守所的發(fā)展歷史過程中開始出現(xiàn)了另一種態(tài)勢(shì)。2009年十一屆全國(guó)人大二次會(huì)議上,多名代表提出議案,其中政協(xié)委員劉白駒提出建議制定《看守所法》,全面規(guī)范看守所體系。作為對(duì)民眾關(guān)注的回應(yīng)以及對(duì)多起看守所被羈押人員非正常死亡事件的反應(yīng),2009年4月公安部與最高人民檢察院?jiǎn)?dòng)了新中國(guó)歷史上最大規(guī)模的看守所執(zhí)法大檢查,許多專家也積極建議由于看守所涉及到對(duì)公民權(quán)利的直接剝奪與限制,根據(jù)《中華人民共和國(guó)立法法》的要求,應(yīng)當(dāng)通過制定法律的方式予以規(guī)范。 看守所是羈押依法被逮捕、刑事拘留的人犯的機(jī)關(guān)。我國(guó)的未決羈押工作由看守所負(fù)責(zé),看守所在體制上統(tǒng)歸公安機(jī)關(guān)進(jìn)行管理。所以我國(guó)未決羈押工作實(shí)質(zhì)由公安機(jī)關(guān)即偵查機(jī)關(guān)進(jìn)行負(fù)責(zé)。而西方國(guó)家關(guān)于羈押場(chǎng)所、羈押制度的研究相對(duì)完善,普遍實(shí)行偵查機(jī)關(guān)和羈押場(chǎng)所相分離的制度.將羈押場(chǎng)所置于第三方機(jī)關(guān)的控制之下,從而避免偵查機(jī)關(guān)利用羈押的便利對(duì)被羈押人員采取各種不恰當(dāng)?shù)幕蛘叻欠ǖ膫刹槭侄巍?在本文中,筆者試圖對(duì)看守所管理機(jī)制的現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行探討和思考,并通過與國(guó)外監(jiān)所現(xiàn)狀與制度比較,對(duì)看守所管理體制改革提出一點(diǎn)建議。 全文共分為四個(gè)部分： 第一部分為緒論部分。主要是研究問題的提出、研究的現(xiàn)狀與方法等。 第二部分為看守所及其管理機(jī)制概述。主要內(nèi)容為看守所的歷史沿革、看守所的性質(zhì)與職能、看守所管理機(jī)制的基本內(nèi)容。 第三部分為看守所管理機(jī)制存在的問題與原因。主要可以概括為以下幾個(gè)方面：超期羈押?jiǎn)栴}嚴(yán)重、刑訊逼供難以杜絕、看守民警自卑消極、機(jī)構(gòu)設(shè)施尚待完善、檢察體制不夠健全、權(quán)利救濟(jì)機(jī)制匱乏。 第四部分為看守所管理機(jī)制改革的思考。主要從完善未決羈押立法、調(diào)整看守所管轄歸屬、健全人才培養(yǎng)獎(jiǎng)勵(lì)機(jī)制、建立健全機(jī)制設(shè)備、完善檢查監(jiān)督制度、建立權(quán)利救濟(jì)制度等方而提出改革建議,完善看守所管理機(jī)制。
[Abstract]:The historical development process of the detention center is unidirectional. Too much emphasis has been placed on the custody of the detainees, reform and even deep digging of crimes, and cooperation in punishing crimes, but the function of human rights protection has not been demonstrated.This is closely related to the overall development of China's legal system.Under the historical conditions at that time, it is difficult to have the elements of modern rule of law in the functional orientation, management system and concrete system of the detention center.However, with the proposal and implementation of the strategy of governing the country according to law, another situation began to emerge in the historical course of the development of the detention center. At the second session of the 11th National people's Congress in 2009, many deputies put forward a motion.Among them, CPPCC member Liu Baiju put forward a proposal to formulate a detention center law, comprehensive standardization of the detention center system.In response to public concern and to a number of cases of irregular deaths of detainees in detention centres, in April 2009, the Ministry of Public Security and the Supreme people's Procuratorate launched the largest law enforcement inspection in the history of the people's Republic of China.Many experts have also actively suggested that, as detention centres involve direct deprivation and restriction of citizens' rights, they should be regulated through the formulation of laws, in accordance with the requirements of the Law of the people's Republic of China on legislation.The detention center is the organ that detains the person who is arrested according to law and who is held in criminal detention.The pending detention in our country is under the charge of the detention center, which is managed by the public security organ.Therefore our country pending custody work essence by the public security organ namely the investigation organ carries on the responsibility.In western countries, the study of detention system is relatively perfect, and the system of separation of investigation organs and places of detention is generally implemented.Put the place of detention under the control of the third party authorities, so as to avoid the investigative authorities to take advantage of the facilities of custody to take various improper or illegal investigative techniques against detainees.In this paper, the author tries to discuss and think about the present situation of the management mechanism of the detention center, and by comparing with the present situation and system of the foreign prison, puts forward some suggestions on the reform of the management system of the detention center.The full text is divided into four parts:The first part is the introduction.It is mainly about the raising of the research problem, the present situation and the method of the research, etc.The second part is an overview of the detention center and its management mechanism.The main content is the historical evolution of the detention center, the nature and function of the detention house, and the basic content of the management mechanism of the detention house.The third part is the problems and reasons of the management mechanism of the detention center.The main aspects can be summarized as follows: the problem of extended detention is serious, it is difficult to stop extorting confessions by torture, the caretaker police are inferiority complex, the institutional facilities need to be improved, the procuratorial system is not perfect, and the right relief mechanism is scarce.The fourth part is about the reform of the management mechanism of the detention center.Suggestions for reform are put forward mainly from the following aspects: perfecting the pending custody legislation, adjusting the jurisdiction of detention centers, perfecting the mechanism of talent training and reward, establishing and perfecting the mechanism and equipment, perfecting the inspection and supervision system, establishing the right relief system, etc.We will improve the management mechanism of detention centers.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南交通大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：D631.7

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 堯亙;被看守的“看守所長(zhǎng)”——扶風(fēng)縣看守所原所長(zhǎng)王建新虐待被監(jiān)管人、受賄案掃描[J];黨風(fēng)與廉政;2003年03期

2 周健;;比較美國(guó)保釋制度看我國(guó)的取保候?qū)廩J];東方企業(yè)文化;2011年20期

3 張瀚;張光南;;“牢頭獄霸”問題與我國(guó)囚犯管理的制度選擇——基于博弈論的法經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)分析[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2010年03期

4 張莉;;法國(guó)法上的監(jiān)所管理行為司法審查[J];法律適用;2010年08期

5 付立慶;;“躲貓貓事件”發(fā)生的根源在于制度性缺陷[J];法學(xué);2009年04期

6 陳金釗;;對(duì)非正常死亡的修飾與法律思維方式[J];法學(xué);2010年07期

7 張磊;何偉;;比較法視角下未決羈押獨(dú)立性的制度探討[J];法制與社會(huì);2009年12期

8 陳宇翔;;美國(guó)律師在場(chǎng)權(quán)適用范圍探析[J];法制與社會(huì);2009年34期

9 鄔偉國(guó);;新形勢(shì)下縣級(jí)看守所安全監(jiān)管問題之我見[J];法制與社會(huì);2011年17期

10 郭振久;;美國(guó)監(jiān)所管理工作考察[J];公安研究;2008年02期

，

本文編號(hào)：1707367