發(fā)布時間：2018-03-17 15:04

  本文選題：群體性事件　切入點：“導(dǎo)火線”事件　出處：《西南政法大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：當(dāng)前我國正處于社會轉(zhuǎn)型時期，，社會系統(tǒng)正經(jīng)歷著內(nèi)在結(jié)構(gòu)的變遷，隨著新舊體制的更替，社會轉(zhuǎn)型在多重壓力下艱難行進(jìn)。這個激蕩的過程一方面有力的促進(jìn)了經(jīng)濟(jì)社會的高速發(fā)展，而另一方面，社會結(jié)構(gòu)與利益關(guān)系的調(diào)整使得社會階層加速分化，社會利益分配機(jī)制失衡，貧富差距不斷擴(kuò)大，在社會公平正義問題凸顯的同時也滋生出了仇視官員、仇視富人、仇視社會不公平現(xiàn)象的社會心態(tài)問題。這些或顯在或潛在的社會風(fēng)險都為群體性事件的爆發(fā)埋下了嚴(yán)重的隱患。當(dāng)民怨無法通過正常的渠道排解就會形成社會積怨，而當(dāng)這一地區(qū)的社會積怨積累到一定程度，一旦發(fā)生能夠引起民眾高度關(guān)注、激起民眾怨氣的“導(dǎo)火線”事件，便會引爆社會矛盾，從而演變?yōu)槿后w性事件。當(dāng)前，地方政府無視民怨，漠視民眾利益訴求，對敏感事件缺乏必要的監(jiān)控，要么無視“導(dǎo)火線”事件，要么暴力壓制，從而使一些本可以遏制或化解的矛盾發(fā)生了轉(zhuǎn)化升級，引發(fā)嚴(yán)重的群體性事件。當(dāng)前尚無群體性事件“導(dǎo)火線”阻斷機(jī)制的直接研究成果，而政府在實際應(yīng)對“導(dǎo)火線”事件過程中也存在一些問題，這使得構(gòu)建群體性事件“導(dǎo)火線”阻斷機(jī)制具有了重要的意義。 本文通過文獻(xiàn)研究、案例研究和比較研究的方法，運用社會燃燒理論、沖突的結(jié)構(gòu)箱理論以及沖突阻斷理論對典型案例進(jìn)行分析，在此基礎(chǔ)上提出了群體性事件“導(dǎo)火線”阻斷的有效對策。 首先，文章對群體性事件“導(dǎo)火線”阻斷機(jī)制進(jìn)行了概述和相關(guān)概念的界定。介紹了群體性事件和“導(dǎo)火線”事件的內(nèi)涵，“導(dǎo)火線”事件的類型及其特點以及“導(dǎo)火線”事件演變?yōu)槿后w性事件所需要的四個條件，即社會矛盾提供的“燃燒物質(zhì)”，社會輿論形成的“助燃劑”，“導(dǎo)火線”事件引起的“明火”、政府失效的“防火墻”。本部分內(nèi)容是研究群體性事件“導(dǎo)火線”阻斷機(jī)制的基礎(chǔ)。 其次，文章對“導(dǎo)火線”事件處置不當(dāng)而演變?yōu)槿后w性事件的典型案例進(jìn)行了分析。通過對石首事件、通鋼事件阻斷失敗的案例與上海倒樓事件、德江事件的成功處置案例進(jìn)行對比分析，剖析“導(dǎo)火線”事件的演變過程，以及案例所反映出來的“導(dǎo)火線”阻斷機(jī)制存在的問題，為接下來的對策分析提供實證基礎(chǔ)。 再次，文章對當(dāng)前群體性事件“導(dǎo)火線”阻斷機(jī)制的現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行了分析，分析了當(dāng)前的“導(dǎo)火線”阻斷模式存在的問題，為在第五部分構(gòu)建有針對性的阻斷機(jī)制提供了依據(jù)。 最后，文章提出了構(gòu)建群體性事件“導(dǎo)火線”阻斷機(jī)制的策略選擇。是在正確認(rèn)識“導(dǎo)火線”事件的性質(zhì)基礎(chǔ)上，利用矛盾醞釀和發(fā)展的過程，盡可能把“阻斷”的環(huán)節(jié)提前。具體對策包括完善“導(dǎo)火線”阻斷的機(jī)制和制度，提高政府應(yīng)對“導(dǎo)火線”事件的能力，針對不同“導(dǎo)火線”事件類型進(jìn)行現(xiàn)場處置，發(fā)揮非政府組織作為第三方平臺的溝通協(xié)調(diào)功能，提高民眾通過體制內(nèi)途徑維權(quán)的意識。以期把“導(dǎo)火線”事件化解于當(dāng)下，防止矛盾的升級和轉(zhuǎn)化。
[Abstract]:At present our country is in the period of social transformation, the social system is experiencing a great change of the internal structure, with the replacement of new and old systems, social transformation under great pressure. The agitation of the struggling process on the one hand, promote the rapid development of economy and society, and on the other hand, the social structure and the adjustment of interests makes the social stratum accelerated differentiation, imbalance of interests distribution mechanism of society, widening gap between rich and poor, while highlighting the problems in social justice breeds hatred officials, hate the rich, hostile social injustice on the social mentality of the problem. The explicit social risk or potential for the outbreak of mass incidents is buried serious hidden trouble. When unable to resolve grievances will form social grievances through normal channels, while the area of social grievances accumulated to a certain extent, the event can cause people Public attention, arouse public resentment of the "fuse" event, will detonate the social contradictions, which evolved into mass incidents. At present, the local government ignored the grievances, ignore public interests, lack of necessary monitoring of sensitive events, or ignore the "fuse" event, or violence, so that some of this can be curbed or resolve the contradiction between the transformation upgrade, causing serious mass incidents. There is no direct current research group event "fuse" blocking mechanism, and the government also has some problems in dealing with the "fuse" event, which makes the construction of mass incidents "fuse" blocking mechanism has an important significance.
Based on literature review, case study and comparative research, this paper applies social combustion theory, conflict structure box theory and conflict blocking theory to analyze typical cases. On this basis, it puts forward effective countermeasures for blocking "fuse" of mass incidents.
First of all, the article on the mass incidents "fuse" blocking mechanism defines the overview and related concepts. This paper introduces the connotation of group events and "fuse" events, "the evolution of the types and characteristics of the fuse" event and "fuse" event for the four conditions of mass incidents are needed, which provide the social contradictions the burning material, the formation of public opinion "accelerant", "fuse" events caused by the "fire" government failure "firewall". This part is based on the mass incidents "fuse" blocking mechanism.
Secondly, the article on the "fuse" event of improper disposal were analyzed and the evolution of the typical case of group events. The Shishou incident, Tonghua blocking failure cases and events Shanghai building collapse, the successful handling of cases Dejiang incident analysis, analysis of changing process of "fuse" events, as well as the case reflected the "fuse" blocking mechanism of the existing problems, and provide empirical basis for the analysis of the next chapter.
Thirdly, the article analyzes the current situation of the block mechanism of mass incidents and analyzes the existing problems of the "fire line" blocking mode, which provides a basis for building a targeted blocking mechanism in the fifth part.
Finally, this paper puts forward constructing group event "fuse" blocking mechanism in nature. Based on the understanding of the "fuse" event, using the brewing and development of contradictions, to advance the link of blocking as much as possible. The specific measures include perfecting mechanism and system blocking, improve the ability to fuse "the government should" fuse "events, on-site disposal for different types of events, play the" fuse "non-governmental organizations as the third party platform communication and coordination function, improve people's consciousness of safeguarding their legal rights. In order to" fuse "events in the moment, preventing the upgrade and transformation of contradiction.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D631.43

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李偉;;群體性事件軟著陸的技術(shù)性手段探析——談?wù)勊枷胝喂ぷ髟谄渲械闹匾饔肹J];重慶郵電大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2012年01期

2 于建嶸;;中國的社會泄憤事件與管治困境[J];當(dāng)代世界與社會主義;2008年01期

3 張書維;王二平;周潔;;相對剝奪與相對滿意:群體性事件的動因分析[J];公共管理學(xué)報;2010年03期

4 黃順康;;非直接利益沖突何以成為影響社會穩(wěn)定的重要因素[J];甘肅社會科學(xué);2008年05期

5 周錦章;;群體性事件產(chǎn)生的機(jī)會結(jié)構(gòu)及對策[J];甘肅社會科學(xué);2009年04期

6 黃順康;夏俊毅;;重大群體性事件的因素鏈和因果關(guān)系分析[J];甘肅社會科學(xué);2010年04期

7 肖鵬英;;當(dāng)代公共危機(jī)管理研究的現(xiàn)狀及發(fā)展趨勢[J];貴州社會科學(xué);2006年04期

8 黃順康;;重大群體性事件沖突阻斷機(jī)制探析[J];貴州社會科學(xué);2009年01期

9 鐘其;;當(dāng)前浙江環(huán)境糾紛及群體性事件研究[J];觀察與思考;2012年02期

10 張成;;無直接利益沖突群體性事件應(yīng)急處置方略——兼對湖北石首事件處置評析[J];湖北警官學(xué)院學(xué)報;2010年01期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前1條

1 本報評論部;[N];人民日報;2011年

本文編號：1625256