本文選題：偵查本體　切入點：SAO　出處：《西南政法大學》2008年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】： 偵查本體論作為偵查學基礎理論的邏輯核心,具有十分重要的學術價值和理論研究意義。 本文首先從傳統(tǒng)偵查觀出發(fā)對偵查本體展開論述,指出了兩類三種傳統(tǒng)偵查觀。兩類分別是指軍事領域的偵察與刑事司法領域的偵查,三種分別是,第一種,以勘驗鑒定為核心的技術型偵查觀;第二種,以獲取情報為主的情報型偵查觀;第三種,以程序正義為標志的程序型偵查觀。鑒于這些傳統(tǒng)偵查觀沒有對偵查本體予以應有的關注,因而導致了長期以來世人對偵查所持有的神秘主義。 破除偵查神秘主義唯有從偵查現(xiàn)象著手對偵查本體加以把握。因為偵查現(xiàn)象是關于偵查本體的近似,而一切偵查現(xiàn)象又都是由偵查律動引起的,所以,通過對偵查現(xiàn)象的理論剖析,我們可以看清其所包含的基本要素。在此還以“紅臉盆之謎'為例來分析了偵查的萌動,并證明了從非傳統(tǒng)的偵查現(xiàn)象到傳統(tǒng)偵查現(xiàn)象的躍升。亦通過對偵查本體、偵查本質、偵查形式與偵查現(xiàn)象的概念辨析,指出偵查本體可定義為對偵查本質的精確描述。 把握偵查本體實在可以通過符號抽象與模型構造來實現(xiàn)。因此,為了從深層次上把握偵查本體,還必須對偵查本體進行進一步的符號抽象。偵查本體抽象符號可設定為I。此舉可以免除無謂的“查”“察”名實爭辯,而偵查本體所涉及的各種模型要素經符號抽象如下:偵查行為A,偵查主體S,偵查客體O,偵查疑域F以及偵查評斷J。而由SO與FJ兩大概念體系建立的以A為紐帶的偵查模型所精確描述之物就是本文論及的偵查本體I。偵查本體I有其本性和表征。I的本性是遞歸,而I的表征則是無法窮舉的各種算法形式——格物致知。由此,我們可以將偵查本體I歸結為格物致知之遞歸。 偵查本體還可以通過形而上下的思路進行深度剖析。I的形而上就是偵查本體本性與表征的合體,仍為格物致知之遞歸。I的形而下可通過各種具體的事物展現(xiàn),具體可被定義為各種與探索發(fā)現(xiàn)活動相似之事物。其內涵是運動行為,外延卻是技術與方法混同后的無窮大。另外,我們必須對無限的I之形而下做出限定,而此種限定并非基于人文傳統(tǒng),而是基于實踐理性。同時,本文在此分析了傳統(tǒng)偵查觀出現(xiàn)的原因,其亦是這種人為限定的結果,但卻并非基于實踐理性。由此展開對偵查理性及其必要性的探討。本文拋出的偵查理性主要涉及兩個方面,一是非攻,二是非蠻。前者是對墨子非攻的援引和延伸。后者則主要出自對偵查能耗的關注。非攻是善惡二元論思路下對偵查功能的道德評斷,其理性在于兼愛。非蠻則是博弈論思路下對偵查的經濟評斷,其理性在于擇優(yōu)。同時,行文至此還從理論上附帶解決了有關“誘惑偵查”的爭議。 在對偵查本體建模的過程中,主要采用了符號抽象與圖示法。其建模原理中涉及對偵查本體存在方式和所含要素及其邏輯途徑的探討。偵查本體存在方式類似于求解反問題。我們可以將偵查本體的運動特性歸結為時空相互爭取的運動,而偵查本體的運動致使現(xiàn)實發(fā)生著某種結構和功能上的改變。偵查本體的存在方式可以通過兩大要素來加以描述,分別是偵查律動和傳遞。實現(xiàn)物之占有的運動機理可稱其為“偵查律動”。其所產生的另一脈動即為“傳遞”。偵查意義上的邏輯聯(lián)系是指事物之間的詮釋關系,而不單指因果關系。從無知到知,從疑到無疑,這是偵查律動和傳遞所依存的兩條邏輯途徑。偵查本體的收縮和膨脹是偵查律動與傳遞的體現(xiàn),在形而下看來其應當是受限的。因而我們在對其進行建模時,必須考慮其模型的界限,使得偵查能夠為人所用。偵查本體具有范式,其復制是偵查范式的繁殖性傳遞。偵查本體理論模型涉及對各種或隱性或顯性的自變量、因變量與恒常量的考察。 基于結構主義和功能主義,我們可以尋到可拷貝的偵查范式。其功能模型為SAO,結構模型為FIJ。在SAO模型中提出兩個命題。第一個命題,SAO模型中,偵查本體I在S和O的賦值發(fā)生改變的情況下,只要A不變,I亦不變。第二個命題,SAO模型中,倘若S、A、O三個變量的賦值都發(fā)生改變,偵查本體I仍不變——任何情況下,I都是恒常的。SAO模型的構筑是以人和物為外圍輪廓,而以偵查行為作為中心紐帶,體現(xiàn)著偵查本體功能性的一面。同時分析了SAO模型的同構異體。并對SAO模型進行了評價,其模型缺陷是結構中心的任意性和偵查本體被忽視,對其補救辦法有自變量捆綁法和模型間平均法。而FIJ模型則給出了偵查本體的具體線性結構框圖。FIJ亦有其同構異體和優(yōu)缺點。對其功能缺失與能量耗散兩大缺陷的補救辦法為增加功能結構以及對溢出能量回收。 但是孤立的SAO或FIJ是不現(xiàn)實的,現(xiàn)實的偵查本體模型必需依靠SAO與FIJ的協(xié)同得以構建。而SAO與FIJ的協(xié)同方案有很多,限定于當下的司法實務進行探討,我們可考慮采用“刑民分離”、“二權分離”以及“程序分離”三大方案予以實現(xiàn)。對此,本文就這三大方案予以簡要論述。 限于篇幅,本文所述的僅是偵查本體論的簡綱。偵查本體尚有許多值得研究之處,而其本體建模與應用更是一項龐雜的精奧工程。要是對偵查本體進行深入研究,相信可以剝離出偵查的本貌,因而可能引發(fā)的后果是,許多含糊不清的理論爭議將喪失辯論立場,而實踐中遇到的許多使人迷惑之處亦可因此得到滿意的答復。甚至偵查本體研究的深入最終還可構筑起偵查學中許多分支研究領域,并在實踐中引發(fā)可預見的理論變革與社會效應。
[Abstract]:The investigation ontology, as the logical core of the basic theory of investigation, has very important academic value and theoretical research significance.
This paper from the view of traditional investigation investigation ontology discussed, pointed out that the two categories of three kinds of traditional concept. Two types of investigation refers to the military field reconnaissance and criminal judicial field investigation, three are, first, technical investigation to inspection and identification as the core concept; second, intelligence type investigation to obtain information based view; third, procedural investigation with procedural justice as a symbol of the concept. In view of the traditional concept of investigation not to investigate the body to pay due attention, resulting in a long time on the investigation of mysticism world holds.
Get rid of the investigation of mysticism only from investigation to grasp the phenomenon of the investigation itself. Because the investigation on the investigation of the phenomenon is approximate ontology, and so all the investigation phenomenon is caused by the investigation, through the investigation on the rhythm of the phenomenon of theoretical analysis, we can see the basic elements it contains. This is the "red basin mystery 'as an example to analyze the investigation starting, and prove that jumped from the traditional to the traditional non investigation phenomenon investigation phenomenon. Also through the investigation on the essence of the concept of ontology, investigation, investigation and investigation form of the phenomenon, the investigation body can be defined as the exact description of the nature of investigation.
Hold the investigation body really can be achieved through abstract symbols and model structure. Therefore, in order to hold the investigation body from the deep, still need further investigation. The investigation of abstract symbols of ontology ontology of abstract symbols can be set to I. this can avoid unnecessary "check" and "police" argument, and various elements of ontology model investigation to the abstract symbols as follows: A S investigation, investigation subject, investigation object O, investigation and investigation of suspected domain F J. investigation body established by the judge SO and FJ two concept system based on A model the investigation link precise description of the paper is the investigation I. ontology I nature and nature characterization of.I and I is recursive, characterization is not exhaustive algorithms form Gewuzhizhi. Thus, our investigation can be attributed to the recursive I ontology Gewuzhizhi.
The body also in-depth analysis of the metaphysical ontology is.I investigation and characterization of the nature of the body through metaphysical ideas, is still the Gewuzhizhi recursive.I and through a variety of specific things to show specific, can be defined as a variety of exploration and discovery activities of similar things. Its connotation is the movement behavior, with extension it is technique and method after infinity. In addition, we must be on the infinite I and make limited, and this limit is not based on the humanistic tradition, but based on the practical reason. At the same time, based on the analysis of the causes of the traditional view of the investigation, this is also the result of artificially, but not on the practical reason. To discuss the rational investigation and its necessity. The rational investigation throws mainly involves two aspects, one is attack, two is not quite. The former is the Mo-tse school's aid Lead and extension. The latter mainly comes from the investigation of energy consumption is concerned. No ditheism ideas of investigation function of moral judgment, the reason is that it is quite universal. Non game theory ideas for investigation of economic evaluation, the reason is preferred. At the same time, here is theoretically solved the related collateral "entrapment" controversy.
In the process of modeling for the investigation of the body, mainly uses abstract symbols and graphical method. The modeling principle involved are discussed and contained elements and logic ways of investigation. The investigation of ontology ontology in a similar way to solving inverse problems. Our investigation can be attributed to the movement characteristics of body movement for each other time the investigation, which leads to the occurrence of a movement of the body structure and function change reality. Existence investigation ontology could be described by the two elements, respectively is the detection of rhythm and transfer. To realize the motion mechanism of possession can be called "the rhythm". Another is the pulse generated by the "transfer". The investigation logic sense refers to the interpretation of the relationship between things, not only refers to the causal relationship. From ignorance to knowledge, from doubt to no doubt, this is the investigation rhythm and the dependence of the two transfer A logical way. The investigation body contraction and expansion is the investigation of rhythm and transfer reflected, and it should be in view is limited. So we in its modeling, must consider the boundary of the model, which can be used for the investigation. The investigation body has its paradigm, replication is the reproduction of the investigation paradigm transfer. Investigation of ontology theory model involving or implicit or explicit arguments, because variables and constant volume.
Doctrine of structuralism and based on the functions we can find copies of the investigative paradigm. The functional model of SAO, the structure model for FIJ. in the SAO model put forward two propositions. First proposition, SAO model, I S in the investigation of ontology assignment and O change, as long as the A constant, I is the same. Second propositions, SAO model, S A O, if the assignment, the three variables are changed, the investigation body I remains unchanged - in any case, I is to build a.SAO model is based on the constant and peripheral contour, and the investigation behavior as the center link, reflect a body of functional investigation. At the same time, analysis of the homogeneous allogenic SAO model. The SAO model was evaluated, the model structure of center of the defect is arbitrary and investigation body is ignored, there are bound variables and the model of average method and its remedy. The FIJ model is given. The specific linear structure block diagram of.FIJ has its isomorphic variant and its advantages and disadvantages. The remedy for its two defects of function loss and energy dissipation is to increase functional structure and spillover energy recovery.
But isolated SAO or FIJ is not realistic, the necessity of building a collaborative ontology model to rely on SAO and FIJ. There are a lot of collaborative design in SAO and FIJ, the judicial practice is limited to the current study, we can consider using the "punishment" separation, "two rights separation" and "separation procedure" the three was implemented. In this regard, the three programs to be discussed.
Because of the limited space, the only outline of investigation ontology. Ontology investigation there are many worthy of research, and the ontology modeling and its application is a complex project. If the essence of an in-depth study of the investigative body, believe that stripping out the investigation of this appearance, which may lead to consequences, the controversial theory of many vague debate will lose position, and encountered in practice many confusing points can therefore get a satisfactory answer. Even the investigation the depth study of ontology can eventually build the investigation in many research areas, and caused the theoretical reform and foreseeable social effects in practice.

【學位授予單位】：西南政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2008
【分類號】：D918

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前7條

1 趙永琛;關于偵查學結構和體系的幾個問題[J];公安大學學報(社會科學版);1998年05期

2 王大中;;論偵查學的邏輯起點——兼論學科邏輯起點及其價值[J];中國人民公安大學學報(社會科學版);2006年01期

3 王福相;;論偵查學的基本問題[J];遼寧公安司法管理干部學院學報;2006年03期

4 李春林;關于刑偵理論中客體問題的思考[J];江蘇公安�？茖W校學報;2000年01期

5 王曉木;對幾種偵查目的觀的法學評析[J];山西警官高等專科學校學報;2001年03期

6 管光承,劉瑩;關于創(chuàng)建我國私人偵探制度的構想[J];江西公安�？茖W校學報;2004年04期

7 馬方;;偵查歷史研究的語境分析[J];云南行政學院學報;2006年01期

，

本文編號：1623433