本文選題：恐怖主義　切入點(diǎn)：成因　出處：《山東大學(xué)》2006年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：本文從恐怖主義犯罪的概念出發(fā)，通過(guò)對(duì)分析恐怖主義犯罪的歷史、現(xiàn)狀、特征極其分類的研究，對(duì)國(guó)際公約、地區(qū)條約、各國(guó)國(guó)內(nèi)法的相關(guān)規(guī)定以及中外學(xué)者對(duì)恐怖主義概念的界定分歧等問(wèn)題進(jìn)行全面的分析。文章力圖通過(guò)這樣的分析理清恐怖主義產(chǎn)生的根源，從而為恐怖主義的防治提供可參考的思路。文章共分七大部分，現(xiàn)將內(nèi)容概括如下： 在前言中，，作者認(rèn)為對(duì)目前“恐怖主義”呈現(xiàn)出的嚴(yán)峻態(tài)勢(shì)，國(guó)際社會(huì)面臨巨大的挑戰(zhàn)。而國(guó)際社會(huì)在反恐斗爭(zhēng)中對(duì)于如何協(xié)調(diào)反恐認(rèn)識(shí)和立場(chǎng)、總結(jié)反恐經(jīng)驗(yàn)、增強(qiáng)和強(qiáng)化反恐措施等方面需要進(jìn)一步反思、研究和改進(jìn)。 在第一部分，作者通過(guò)對(duì)現(xiàn)有的國(guó)際公約、條約及各國(guó)法律規(guī)定的考察，同時(shí)參照中外學(xué)者對(duì)恐怖主義的分析界定方法，闡述恐怖主義犯罪概念歧義叢生的原因，從歷史觀和系統(tǒng)論來(lái)分析恐怖主義并進(jìn)行概念的界定，力求概念準(zhǔn)確、科學(xué)而合理。 第二部分，人們對(duì)恐怖主義的認(rèn)識(shí)，與其在社會(huì)發(fā)展過(guò)程中不同的時(shí)期不同階段的表現(xiàn)密不可分的。作者通過(guò)對(duì)恐怖主義演進(jìn)的歷史進(jìn)程，結(jié)合恐怖主義現(xiàn)狀來(lái)分析恐怖主義的成因。 第三部分，作者認(rèn)為恐怖主義作為一種社會(huì)歷史現(xiàn)象，只要國(guó)際國(guó)內(nèi)矛盾繼續(xù)存在，恐怖主義的根源沒有肅清，那么恐怖活動(dòng)必將長(zhǎng)期存在。而且隨著社會(huì)和科學(xué)技術(shù)的發(fā)展，恐怖主義的發(fā)展也有新的特點(diǎn)。對(duì)恐怖主義犯罪的認(rèn)識(shí)由于存在不同的立場(chǎng)、角度，導(dǎo)致對(duì)恐怖主義的認(rèn)識(shí)本身很難達(dá)成一致。所以如何對(duì)恐怖主義進(jìn)行分類，到目前為止仍沒有一個(gè)統(tǒng)一的認(rèn)識(shí)和標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。 第四部分，多數(shù)國(guó)家簽署的國(guó)際條約和公約為國(guó)際社會(huì)防治恐怖主義犯罪奠定了重要的法律基礎(chǔ)。但同時(shí)也對(duì)傳統(tǒng)刑法理念提出挑戰(zhàn)，尤其是在“9·11”以后的反恐怖組織犯罪立法，對(duì)傳統(tǒng)的刑法和刑事訴訟法具有特別的意義和影響。擴(kuò)大的國(guó)際反恐怖主義犯罪立法在人權(quán)保障方面產(chǎn)生了問(wèn)題。這個(gè)問(wèn)題實(shí)際上反映了刑事司法之控制犯罪與保障人權(quán)之間的價(jià)值沖突。如何解決這個(gè)沖突?作者認(rèn)為，任何情況下，保障人權(quán)都是第一位的。即現(xiàn)代的刑法必須總是使刑罰對(duì)恐怖主義犯罪發(fā)揮作用，都必須遵守法治國(guó)家的嚴(yán)格要求。 第五部分，作者認(rèn)為我國(guó)的反恐的立法、司法現(xiàn)狀、反恐犯罪的模式基本上還停留
[Abstract]:This paper starts from the concept of terrorist crime, through the analysis of the history, current situation, characteristics and classification of terrorist crime, the international conventions, regional treaties, The relevant provisions of the domestic laws of various countries and the differences between Chinese and foreign scholars in defining the concept of terrorism are comprehensively analyzed. The article tries to clarify the root causes of terrorism through such an analysis. In order to provide a reference for the prevention and control of terrorism. The article is divided into seven parts, which are summarized as follows:. In the preface, the author holds that the international community is facing enormous challenges to the severe situation of "terrorism" at present. In the struggle against terrorism, the international community has summed up its experience on how to coordinate its understanding and position on how to combat terrorism. Further reflection, research and improvement are needed in such aspects as strengthening and strengthening anti-terrorism measures. In the first part, by examining the existing international conventions, treaties and national laws and regulations, and referring to the analysis and definition of terrorism by Chinese and foreign scholars, the author explains the reasons why the concept of terrorism crime is ambiguous. This paper analyzes and defines terrorism from the view of history and system theory, and tries to make the concept accurate, scientific and reasonable. In the second part, people's understanding of terrorism is closely related to its performance in different periods and stages in the process of social development. Combined with the current situation of terrorism to analyze the causes of terrorism. In the third part, the author holds that terrorism, as a social and historical phenomenon, as long as international and domestic contradictions persist and the root causes of terrorism are not eliminated, terrorist activities will certainly exist for a long time. And with the development of society and science and technology, The development of terrorism also has new characteristics. Because of the existence of different positions and angles of understanding of terrorist crimes, it is very difficult to agree on the understanding of terrorism itself. Therefore, how to classify terrorism, So far there is still no unified understanding and standards. In 4th, the international treaties and conventions signed by most countries laid an important legal foundation for the international community to prevent and control terrorist crimes. At the same time, they also challenged the traditional concept of criminal law, especially the anti-terrorist organization crime legislation after "9 / 11". It is of particular significance and influence to the traditional criminal law and criminal procedure law... The expanded international anti-terrorism crime legislation has created problems in the field of human rights guarantee. This problem actually reflects the crime control and the criminal justice system. Conflict of values between the guarantees of human rights. How can this conflict be resolved? The author holds that, in any case, the protection of human rights is the first, that is, the modern criminal law must always make the criminal law play a role in the crime of terrorism, and must abide by the strict requirements of the country ruled by law. In the 5th part, the author thinks that our country's anti-terrorism legislation, judicial status quo and the mode of anti-terrorism crime are still basically staying in our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2006
【分類號(hào)】：D917.6

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 耿民;王小平;;恐怖襲擊下地鐵反(防)恐研究概況[J];城市軌道交通研究;2008年10期

2 鐵海霞;孫志剛;閆祥東;;心理測(cè)試中利用腦電位檢測(cè)潛在恐怖分子研究[J];甘肅警察職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年02期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 葉俊;網(wǎng)絡(luò)恐怖主義犯罪對(duì)策初探[D];上海交通大學(xué);2007年

2 樊杰輝;論當(dāng)代恐怖主義的根源[D];山東師范大學(xué);2013年

本文編號(hào)：1622845