本文關(guān)鍵詞： 司法鑒定體制 刑事鑒定體制 刑事鑒定管理制度 鑒定機(jī)構(gòu)　出處：《華中師范大學(xué)》2008年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】： 鑒定結(jié)論作為法定證據(jù)的一種,以其獨(dú)特的地位和價(jià)值在訴訟過(guò)程中發(fā)揮著關(guān)鍵的作用,因而也備受關(guān)注。特別是在刑事訴訟過(guò)程中。目前我國(guó)刑事鑒定制度中存在著管理缺位和立法疏漏等問(wèn)題,完善刑事鑒定制度是當(dāng)務(wù)之急。了解刑事鑒定制度的歷史沿革,分析和比較大陸法系、英美法系鑒定制度的利弊,才能在完善我國(guó)刑事鑒定制度時(shí),做到趨利避害,既符合我國(guó)國(guó)情,順應(yīng)司法改革的總體趨勢(shì),又借鑒、吸收他國(guó)鑒定制度的合理元素,做到古為今用,洋為中用。只有這樣,才能實(shí)現(xiàn)刑事鑒定制度的最高追求:公正、效率。刑事鑒定制度的完善,首先要確立刑事鑒定體制的價(jià)值目標(biāo),其次要構(gòu)建科學(xué)合理的鑒定體制和管理體系,再次要完善鑒定立法,理順鑒定體制內(nèi)在和外在的關(guān)系,才能使鑒定制度的建設(shè)和完善走上正軌,才能建立科學(xué)合理的鑒定體制。
[Abstract]:As a kind of legal evidence, the appraisal conclusion plays a key role in the litigation process with its unique status and value. Especially in the process of criminal procedure, there are some problems in our criminal identification system, such as the absence of management and the omission of legislation. It is urgent to improve the criminal identification system. Only by analyzing and comparing the advantages and disadvantages of the identification system of the civil law system and the common law system, can we make the criminal identification system in our country be advantageous and avoid disadvantages, which is in line with the national conditions of our country, conform to the general trend of the judicial reform, and draw lessons from it. To absorb the reasonable elements of other countries' appraisal system, to make the past for the present and the foreign for the Chinese. Only in this way, can the highest pursuit of the criminal appraisal system be realized: fairness, efficiency, perfection of the criminal appraisal system, First of all, we should establish the value goal of the criminal appraisal system, secondly, we should build a scientific and reasonable appraisal system and management system, and then we should perfect the appraisal legislation, and straighten out the relationship between the inside and outside of the appraisal system. Only then can the construction and perfection of the appraisal system be put on the right track and a scientific and reasonable appraisal system be established.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華中師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2008
【分類號(hào)】：D918.9

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 沈健;比較與借鑒:鑒定人制度研究[J];比較法研究;2004年02期

2 王云海;日本司法鑒定制度的現(xiàn)狀與改革[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2003年06期

3 羅亞平,郝紅光;中外司法鑒定人制度比較研究[J];公安大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1998年06期

4 羅亞平;英國(guó)物證鑒定體制的改革與發(fā)展[J];公安大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);1999年06期

5 徐立根;對(duì)我國(guó)鑒定制度中幾個(gè)問(wèn)題的研究[J];中國(guó)人民公安大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2005年04期

6 陳衛(wèi)東;;嚴(yán)格司法程序 維護(hù)公平正義[J];求是;2007年04期

7 張方;從兩種鑒定類型的比較看我國(guó)司法鑒定委托權(quán)的歸屬[J];人民檢察;2000年07期

8 劉金華;論訴訟公正與效率[J];山西省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年03期

9 樊崇義,陳永生;我國(guó)刑事鑒定制度改革與完善[J];中國(guó)刑事法雜志;2000年04期

10 胡錫慶,蔣琦;完善我國(guó)刑事鑒定啟動(dòng)權(quán)新探[J];政治與法律;2003年06期

，

本文編號(hào)：1528473