本文關鍵詞： 刑訊逼供 特征 原因 危害 對策　出處：《山東大學》2007年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】： 長期以來,刑訊逼供現(xiàn)象在司法實踐中屢禁不止。它嚴重侵犯公民人身權利,損害正當程序,妨害實體真實,違背無罪推定原則,極易導致司法腐敗,造成冤假錯案,成為影響我國法治文明與公正的一朵“惡之花”。為此,筆者從依法治國、程序正義和保障人權的角度出發(fā),對刑訊逼供現(xiàn)象進行了認真的法律思考,深刻分析刑訊逼供存在的原因,揭示刑訊逼供的危害,研究探尋刑訊逼供的應對之策和治本機制。這在理論上是十分重要的,在實踐上是非常緊迫的,對于促進我國司法文明與公正,維護社會公平與正義,進一步密切警民關系和建設社會主義和諧社會都具有十分重要的意義。 本文除了前言及結語之外,共分四個部分: 第一部分是刑訊逼供的概述。主要敘述了有關刑訊逼供的國內外有關的學術觀點和立法準則,進而對刑訊逼供的概念進行了界定。接著,闡述了刑訊逼供在各個歷史時期的歷史運行軌跡,分析了刑訊逼供在我國的現(xiàn)狀和特點。 第二部分分析刑訊逼供產生的原因。導致刑訊逼供產生的因素是多方面的,既有其社會根源,更有其制度根源。由于建殘余思想的影響,司法工作人員法制觀念淡薄,急功近利思想突出,執(zhí)法素質不高,證據制度不完善,破案技術設備落后,查禁力度不大以及長期受“有罪推定”、“等級特權”和“罪從供定”的司法觀念影響,“刑訊逼供利大于弊”、“口供是證據之王”等錯誤觀念在司法實踐中還頗有市場,致使刑訊現(xiàn)象屢禁不止,難以從根本上杜絕。 第三部分客觀分析了刑訊逼供的危害。指出刑訊逼供嚴重侵犯了犯罪嫌疑人和被告人的人權,不利于查清案件的事實真相,降低了辦案的效率和效益,增加了辦案成本。 第四部分是針對刑訊逼供產生的原因,提出了遏制刑訊逼供的對策。遏制刑訊逼供,不僅需要轉變執(zhí)法觀念,牢固樹立法律至上和尊重保障人權的理念,更需要完善刑事訴訟制度,堵塞法律漏洞。為此,筆者建議從更新觀念、完善機制、調整策略、創(chuàng)新措施入手,強化教育培訓,增強法制觀念,提高執(zhí)法素質;完善刑事訴訟中的訊問制度,引入沉默權、無罪推定、非法證據排除等規(guī)則,確保嚴格、公正、文明執(zhí)法;堅持科教強警,加大司法投入,改善技術裝備,進一步提高偵查破案的科技含量;強化內外監(jiān)督制約機制,嚴肅查處刑訊逼供案件,才能最大限度地減少和遏制此類現(xiàn)象的發(fā)生。 結語部分是論文的歸結。提出只有標本兼治,綜合治理,才能將刑訊逼供的危害減少到最低限度,進而實現(xiàn)司法文明,促進社會和諧和執(zhí)法公正。
[Abstract]:For a long time, the phenomenon of extorting confessions by torture has been repeatedly prohibited in judicial practice. It seriously infringes on the personal rights of citizens, damages due process, impairs the reality of entities, violates the principle of presumption of innocence, easily leads to judicial corruption and results in false and false cases. It has become a "flower of evil" that affects the civilization and justice of rule of law in our country. Therefore, from the point of view of ruling the country by law, procedural justice and safeguarding human rights, the author makes a serious legal consideration on the phenomenon of extorting confessions by torture. It is very important in theory and in practice to deeply analyze the reasons for the existence of extorting confessions by torture, reveal the harm of extorting confessions by torture, and explore the countermeasures and mechanisms to deal with it by torture. It is of great significance to promote judicial civilization and justice, maintain social fairness and justice, further close the relationship between the police and the people and build a harmonious socialist society. In addition to the preface and conclusion, this paper is divided into four parts:. The first part is the summary of extorting confessions by torture. It mainly describes the relevant academic viewpoints and legislative norms about extorting confessions by torture at home and abroad, and then defines the concept of extorting confessions by torture. This paper expounds the historical running track of extorting confessions by torture in each historical period, and analyzes the present situation and characteristics of extorting confessions by torture in China. The second part analyzes the causes of extorting confessions by torture. The factors leading to the extortion of confessions by torture are various, both social and institutional. Due to the influence of residual ideology, the concept of legal system of judicial staff is weak. The thought of quick success and instant benefit is prominent, the quality of law enforcement is not high, the system of evidence is not perfect, and the technical equipment for solving cases is backward. The prohibition is not strong enough and has long been influenced by the judicial concepts of "presumption of guilt", "privilege of rank" and "conviction of crime". The misconceptions such as "extorting confessions by torture outweigh the disadvantages" and "confessions are the king of evidence" still have a market in judicial practice. As a result, the phenomenon of torture repeatedly prohibited, it is difficult to fundamentally eliminate. The third part objectively analyzes the harm of extorting confessions by torture, and points out that extorting confessions by torture seriously infringes the human rights of suspects and defendants, is not conducive to finding out the truth of cases, reduces the efficiency and effectiveness of handling cases, and increases the cost of handling cases. The 4th part is aimed at the causes of extorting confessions by torture, and puts forward countermeasures to curb the extortion of confessions by torture. To curb the extortion of confessions by torture, it is necessary not only to change the concept of law enforcement, but also to firmly establish the idea of the supremacy of law and respect for human rights. It is also necessary to perfect the criminal procedure system and plug the legal loophole. Therefore, the author suggests to start with renewing the concept, perfecting the mechanism, adjusting the strategy, innovating the measures, strengthening the education and training, strengthening the concept of the legal system and improving the quality of the law enforcement; To improve the interrogation system in criminal proceedings, introduce the right to silence, presumption of innocence, exclusion of illegal evidence, and other rules to ensure strict, fair and civilized law enforcement; insist on strengthening the police through science and education, increase judicial input, and improve technical equipment, Only by further improving the scientific and technological content of investigating and solving cases, strengthening the internal and external supervision and restriction mechanism, and strictly investigating and punishing cases of extorting confessions by torture, can the occurrence of this kind of phenomenon be minimized and restrained. The conclusion part is the conclusion of the paper. It is proposed that only by treating both the symptoms and the root causes and comprehensively, can the harm of extorting confessions by torture be reduced to the minimum, and then the judicial civilization be realized, and social harmony and law enforcement justice be promoted.
【學位授予單位】：山東大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2007
【分類號】：D918.5

【引證文獻】

相關碩士學位論文 前3條

1 陶孟歡;警察刑訊逼供之心理分析及對策研究[D];重慶大學;2010年

2 唐丹;論我國刑法中的刑訊逼供行為[D];湘潭大學;2012年

3 朱小菡;論刑迅逼供的遏制機制[D];華南理工大學;2013年

，

本文編號：1517035