本文關(guān)鍵詞： 秘密偵查 法治化 建構(gòu) 控制犯罪 保障人權(quán)　出處：《山東大學(xué)》2007年碩士論文　論文類(lèi)型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】： 隨著社會(huì)的發(fā)展,犯罪已成為現(xiàn)代社會(huì)的一顆毒瘤,并且其職業(yè)化、組織化、智能化、隱蔽化、暴力化、國(guó)際化程度日益加劇,給我們以公開(kāi)偵查為主的傳統(tǒng)偵查模式帶來(lái)嚴(yán)峻的挑戰(zhàn)。為此,世界各國(guó)紛紛運(yùn)用秘密偵查手段來(lái)打擊和懲治犯罪,以實(shí)現(xiàn)控制犯罪的目的,秘密偵查在預(yù)防犯罪、控制犯罪中發(fā)揮了巨大的作用。但是,秘密偵查是一柄"雙刃劍",一方面它能快捷高效地收集證據(jù),懲治犯罪;另一方面它又極易被濫用從而侵犯公民的合法權(quán)益。追求控制犯罪、保障人權(quán)和實(shí)現(xiàn)訴訟效率等多元化的平衡是現(xiàn)代訴訟的價(jià)值目標(biāo)。在兼顧多元化價(jià)值目標(biāo)的基礎(chǔ)上,通過(guò)法律程序來(lái)限制國(guó)家司法權(quán)力、保障人權(quán),已成為現(xiàn)代法治國(guó)家的共識(shí)。加強(qiáng)秘密偵查的法律規(guī)制是我們依法治國(guó),構(gòu)建和諧社會(huì)的必然選擇�；诖�,筆者研究了秘密偵查的基本理論、歷史沿革和價(jià)值功能,客觀分析了我國(guó)秘密偵查立法和司法方面的現(xiàn)狀和缺失,揭示秘密偵查和人權(quán)保障的沖突,在比較法治國(guó)家秘密偵查的立法和司法實(shí)踐的基礎(chǔ)上,結(jié)合我國(guó)的實(shí)際情況,提出了秘密偵查法治化的建構(gòu)設(shè)想,希望對(duì)我國(guó)秘密偵查的立法和司法實(shí)踐方面有所裨益。 本文共分五大部分。 第一部分秘密偵查概述。首先界定了秘密偵查的概念,介紹了秘密偵查的特征,即隱蔽性、侵權(quán)性、強(qiáng)制性、直接性、主動(dòng)性、程序性、從屬性。然后對(duì)秘密偵查種類(lèi)進(jìn)行重新劃分,即秘密外線偵查、秘密內(nèi)線偵查和技術(shù)偵查三類(lèi)。最后,闡述了秘密偵查的功能,即預(yù)防和制止犯罪、擴(kuò)大證據(jù)來(lái)源、查明特殊犯罪等功能。 第二部分秘密偵查溯源。首先按照時(shí)間順序簡(jiǎn)要考察了中國(guó)歷朝出現(xiàn)的秘密偵查活動(dòng),然后考察了國(guó)外秘密偵查的歷史,最后,分析總結(jié)了中西秘密偵查歷史變遷的現(xiàn)代啟示。 第三部分秘密偵查法治化的國(guó)際考察。分別對(duì)英美法系國(guó)家、大陸法系國(guó)家秘密偵查的法治化進(jìn)行比較研究,然后歸納總結(jié)出西方法治國(guó)家秘密偵查的原則,即法定原則、比例原則、特定性原則、司法審查原則、司法救濟(jì)原則。 第四部分我國(guó)秘密偵查立法的現(xiàn)狀與適用實(shí)踐。對(duì)我國(guó)秘密偵查的立法現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行歸納總結(jié),按照兩大法系法治國(guó)家秘密偵查的原則,客觀的找出了我國(guó)秘密偵查存在的立法缺陷和司法實(shí)踐中存在的問(wèn)題。 第五部分我國(guó)秘密偵查的法治建構(gòu)。秘密偵查法治化是社會(huì)發(fā)展的必然趨勢(shì),是時(shí)代發(fā)展的產(chǎn)物,分析了我國(guó)實(shí)現(xiàn)秘密偵查的法治化的必要性和可行性,提出了法治化進(jìn)程中必須注意的幾個(gè)問(wèn)題。最后,基于我國(guó)的基本國(guó)情,結(jié)合國(guó)際發(fā)展的潮流,論文主要從秘密偵查的主體、適用范圍、適用條件、實(shí)施程序、偵查期限、證據(jù)能力、協(xié)助機(jī)關(guān)或公民的權(quán)利和義務(wù)、年度報(bào)告制度等八個(gè)方面具體論述了我國(guó)秘密偵查制度的法治化建構(gòu)問(wèn)題。
[Abstract]:With the development of society, crime has become a cancer in modern society, and its professionalism, organization, intelligence, covert, violence, and the degree of internationalization is increasingly intensified. It brings us a severe challenge to the traditional investigation mode, which is based on open investigation. For this reason, countries around the world use secret investigative techniques to crack down and punish crime, in order to achieve the purpose of crime control. Secret investigation plays a great role in crime prevention and crime control. However, secret investigation is a "double-edged sword". On the one hand, it can collect evidence quickly and efficiently and punish crime. On the other hand, it is easy to be abused so as to violate the legitimate rights and interests of citizens. Protection of human rights and the realization of the pluralistic balance of litigation efficiency is the value goal of modern litigation. On the basis of taking into account the pluralistic value goal, the judicial power of the state is restricted through legal procedures to protect human rights. It has become the consensus of the modern country ruled by law. Strengthening the legal regulation of secret investigation is the inevitable choice for us to govern the country according to law and build a harmonious society. Based on this, the author studies the basic theory of secret investigation. Historical evolution and value function, objective analysis of our country secret investigation legislation and judicial aspects of the status quo and deficiencies, reveal the secret investigation and human rights protection conflict. On the basis of comparing the legislation and judicial practice of secret investigation in a country ruled by law, combined with the actual situation of our country, this paper puts forward a constructive assumption of the rule of law of secret investigation. It is hoped that it will be beneficial to the legislative and judicial practice of secret investigation in our country. This paper is divided into five parts. The first part is an overview of secret investigation. Firstly, it defines the concept of secret investigation and introduces the characteristics of secret investigation, that is, concealment, tort, compulsion, directness, initiative and procedure. Then the types of secret investigation are reclassified, namely secret outside line investigation, secret inside line investigation and technical investigation. Finally, the function of secret investigation is expounded, that is, to prevent and suppress crime. Expand the sources of evidence, identify special crimes and other functions. The second part is the tracing of secret investigation. Firstly, the author briefly examines the secret investigation activities in Chinese history, and then the history of foreign secret investigation. Finally, the author studies the history of secret investigation in China. This paper analyzes and summarizes the modern enlightenment of the historical changes of secret investigation between China and the West. The third part is the international investigation on the rule of law of secret investigation. It makes a comparative study on the rule of law in the countries of Anglo-American law system and civil law system respectively, and then sums up the principles of secret investigation in western countries ruled by law. Legal principle, principle of proportion, principle of specificity, principle of judicial review, principle of judicial remedy. 4th part of our country secret investigation legislation present situation and the application practice. To our country secret investigation legislation present situation carries on the summary, according to the two legal system country secret investigation principle. Objective to find out the legislative defects of secret investigation and the problems in judicial practice. 5th part of our country secret investigation rule of law construction, secret investigation rule of law is the inevitable trend of social development, is the product of the development of the times, analyzed the necessity and feasibility of our country to achieve secret investigation by law. Finally, based on the basic conditions of our country, combined with the trend of international development, the paper mainly from the subject of secret investigation, the scope of application, applicable conditions, implementation procedures. This paper discusses concretely the construction of the system of secret investigation in our country from eight aspects, such as the period of investigation, the ability of evidence, the rights and obligations of assisting organs or citizens, and the system of annual report.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2007
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D918

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 王宇敏;秘密偵查的程序性法律規(guī)制[D];華東政法大學(xué);2010年

2 劉春成;秘密偵查與隱私權(quán)保護(hù)的沖突及平衡[D];西南政法大學(xué);2011年

3 郝利;論臥底偵查[D];西南財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2010年

4 張若楠;秘密偵查的法律規(guī)制[D];湖南大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號(hào)：1493769