本文關(guān)鍵詞：公安機(jī)關(guān)偵查權(quán)運(yùn)行中的制約性因素探究　出處：《西南政法大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 偵查權(quán) 制約性因素 權(quán)利 輿論監(jiān)督

【摘要】：在民主和法治意識(shí)日漸成熟的今天，偵查權(quán)的運(yùn)行過(guò)程關(guān)系到每個(gè)人的最基本的權(quán)利，由于在我國(guó)長(zhǎng)期以來(lái)存在重實(shí)體輕程序和偵查機(jī)關(guān)權(quán)力過(guò)大的錯(cuò)誤觀念，造成了很多侵犯人權(quán)和冤假錯(cuò)案案件的出現(xiàn)。因此要重構(gòu)偵查權(quán)運(yùn)行過(guò)程中的話語(yǔ)系統(tǒng)，讓各種制約性因素的功能復(fù)位，營(yíng)造一個(gè)良好的偵查權(quán)運(yùn)行機(jī)制和過(guò)程。只有這樣，才能使偵查權(quán)運(yùn)行的更為順暢。本文將從以下五個(gè)部分對(duì)我國(guó)偵查權(quán)運(yùn)行中的制約性因素進(jìn)行論述和探究。 第一部分是對(duì)有關(guān)的基本范疇和概念進(jìn)行辨析。筆者主要從三個(gè)方面進(jìn)行辨析，第一是對(duì)偵查和偵查權(quán)的字義進(jìn)行辨析，再就是討論一下有關(guān)“運(yùn)行”的問(wèn)題，最后論述的是制約性因素；在制約性因素部分筆者還比較了制約和監(jiān)督的內(nèi)在含義和區(qū)別。這部分算是本文的基礎(chǔ)部分。 第二部分論述的是偵查權(quán)制約的理論基礎(chǔ)。在本部分筆者主要分兩個(gè)方面進(jìn)行書寫，第一是偵查權(quán)制約思想的發(fā)展，筆者從洛克、孟德斯鳩、霍布斯、馬克思和孫中山的權(quán)力制約思想中得到啟發(fā)，認(rèn)為偵查權(quán)是需要制約和監(jiān)督的。第二是對(duì)國(guó)外視角下的分析比較，筆者從英美法系和大陸法系具有代表性的國(guó)家出發(fā)，逐一介紹了幾個(gè)典型國(guó)家偵查權(quán)制約的機(jī)制和制度，以期對(duì)我國(guó)有良好的借鑒意義。 第三部分介紹的是我國(guó)偵查權(quán)制約的必要性和可能性，本部分寫了我國(guó)偵查程序中偵查權(quán)運(yùn)行的現(xiàn)狀，我國(guó)目前偵查機(jī)關(guān)權(quán)力過(guò)于強(qiáng)大，而監(jiān)督和制約機(jī)制卻是非常的薄弱，為了更好的實(shí)現(xiàn)偵查目的和提高偵查效率，對(duì)偵查權(quán)的監(jiān)督和制約具有必要性和緊迫性。 第四部分是本文的重點(diǎn)，論述的是偵查權(quán)制約性因素的個(gè)性解析。由于偵查權(quán)的制約性因素很多，對(duì)于司法權(quán)制約偵查程序，學(xué)界已形成比較完整的理論，，所以筆者就從權(quán)利和輿論監(jiān)督的視角來(lái)探究一下怎么來(lái)制約偵查權(quán)。這部分筆者著墨較多，也是本文的重點(diǎn)所在。 第五部分筆者論述的是要進(jìn)一步完善偵查權(quán)制約機(jī)制。偵查權(quán)制約機(jī)制是一個(gè)系統(tǒng)，制約性因素也很多，只有把各制約性因素納入到一個(gè)良好的機(jī)制中來(lái)，使各制約性因素能為偵查權(quán)運(yùn)行服務(wù)，這才是本文行文的目的所在。因此，我們要對(duì)偵查權(quán)運(yùn)行過(guò)程中的制約性因素有理性的認(rèn)識(shí)，以期這些制約性因素能為偵查權(quán)力的運(yùn)行提供一個(gè)好的運(yùn)行環(huán)境，合作打造公眾認(rèn)同的偵查形式法治和實(shí)質(zhì)法治。
[Abstract]:In democracy and the rule of law consciousness gradually mature today, the power of investigation process to everyone's basic rights, because in China has long been the entity lightprogram and the investigativepower big misconception, causing many violations of human rights and miscarriages of justice cases. Therefore to discourse system the operation process of reconstruction of investigation power, reset so that all sorts of restrictive factors, create a good investigation power operation mechanism and process. The only way to make the right of investigation of the operation more smoothly. This paper will discuss the following five aspects of the factors restricting China's right of investigation in the operation of the discussion and exploration.
The first part is the analysis on the basic categories and concepts. The author mainly analyzes from three aspects, the first is the analysis of the investigation and investigation of the right to discuss the meaning of words is "run", finally discusses the restrictive factors in restricting factors; the author also compared the inner meaning and the difference between control and supervision. This part is the basic part of this paper.
The second part introduces the theoretical basis of the right to restrict the investigation. Written in this part the author mainly consists of two aspects, the first is the development of the investigation power control theory, the author from Rock, Montesquieu, Hobbes, Marx and Sun Zhongshan's power restriction thought were inspired, that is to restrict and supervise the investigation power. Second comparative analysis of foreign perspective, the common law and civil law from the representative countries of the author introduces mechanism and system of several typical countries the right to restrict the investigation, in order to our country a good reference.
The third part introduces the necessity and possibility of restricting the power of investigation in China, this part written status investigation right in investigation procedure in our country run, China's current investigative power is too strong, and the supervision and restriction mechanism is very weak, in order to better achieve the purpose of investigation and improve the efficiency of investigation, supervision and restriction the power of investigation is necessary and urgent.
The fourth part is the focus of this paper, discusses the personality analysis of investigation power restriction factors. Because there are many factors restricting the power of investigation, judicial power restriction investigation procedure in academic circles has formed a relatively complete theory, so the author from the rights and supervision of public opinion perspective to explore how to restrict the right of investigation. Part of the focus, the focus of this article.
The author discusses the fifth part is to further improve the restriction mechanism of the power of investigation. The investigation power restriction mechanism is a system, there are many restrictive factors, only the restrictive factors into a good mechanism, make the restrictive factors for the criminal investigation service, this is the. Purpose. Therefore, we should have a rational understanding of the factors restricting the power of investigation in the operation process, to provide a good environment to these restrictive factors for the investigation power operation, cooperationcreate public identity investigation form of the rule of law and the essence of the rule of law.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D918

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 王美麗;;論刑事審前程序改革中的偵查適度公開[J];甘肅社會(huì)科學(xué);2006年05期

2 金宏武;;論偵查公開[J];湘潭師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年06期

3 陳曉輝;;淺析我國(guó)公安機(jī)關(guān)的新聞發(fā)言人制度[J];中南民族大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年S1期

本文編號(hào)：1428968