發(fā)布時間：2018-01-08 23:13

  本文關(guān)鍵詞：邱興華故意殺人、搶劫案案例分析　出處：《蘭州大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 精神障礙 刑事責任能力 司法鑒定

【摘要】：在本案中,邱興華作案的動機令人無法理解,手段殘忍的程度也完全超出正常人的理解范圍。部分精神醫(yī)學(xué)專家根據(jù)律師調(diào)查的情況和有關(guān)證人的證詞,懷疑邱興華患有精神疾病。隨后,多名法學(xué)家、律師也發(fā)表公開信或談話,主張對邱興華進行精神鑒定的問題。而二審法院卻最終駁回辯護人要求精神鑒定的申請,對邱興華判處死刑。這使得社會對精神障礙的刑事責任能力問題的關(guān)注達到了頂點。 文章在第一章簡要介紹了本案的基本情況以及案件的爭議焦點；在第二章和第三章則主要圍繞著案件的爭議焦點來展開分析；在第四章主要論述了筆者對此案件的一些反思。 本文采用以案例分析方法為主、論述方法為輔的綜合性論述方法,從法學(xué)、辯證法的角度出發(fā),提出課題研究的背景,闡述課題研究的價值,分析存在的相關(guān)問題,以及解決問題的方法和途徑這一邏輯思維脈絡(luò),運用理論聯(lián)系實踐的方法進行寫作。 筆者將圍繞著所選案例的爭議焦點,即精神障礙者的刑事責任能力問題和本案中所反映的我國司法鑒定制度存在的問題,最后闡述了對我國的司法鑒定制度的建言,以其可以對我國關(guān)于精神障礙者責任能力問題的研究和我國精神司法鑒定的完善有所裨益。
[Abstract]:In this case, Qiu Xinghua is unable to understand the motive, means cruelty is completely beyond the scope of normal human understanding. Part of the spirit of medical experts according to the investigation of the case and the relevant lawyer witness, Qiu Xinghua suspected of suffering from mental illness. Subsequently, many jurists, lawyers also published an open letter or talk, advocating the spirit of the identification of Qiu Xinghua's problems. But the court of second instance but ultimately rejected the defense request for psychiatric evaluation, the death penalty for Qiu Xinghua. This makes the social problem of criminal responsibility of mental disorder, attention to the climax.
In the first chapter, the basic situation of the case and the controversial focus of the case are briefly introduced. In the second and third chapters, the focus of the dispute is analyzed. In the fourth chapter, I mainly discuss some reflections on the case.
This paper mainly adopts the methods of case analysis, a comprehensive discussion of methods, discusses the method from the law, dialectical point of view, put forward the research background, expounds the value of the topic, related problems were analyzed, and the method and the way to solve the problem of the logical thought, using the method of theory and practice writing.
The author will focus on the selected cases are the focus of controversy, the judicial system in China the problems that problem of criminal responsibility of persons with mental disorders and in this case, finally elaborated the judicial appraisal system in our country's suggestions, in order to perfect its to research on ability of mental disorders responsibility I China and the spirit of our judicial benefit.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D919.3

【引證文獻】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 袁海波;論精神障礙司法鑒定制度的完善[D];上海交通大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號：1399054