本文關(guān)鍵詞：公安機(jī)關(guān)調(diào)解民事糾紛的問題與對(duì)策研究　出處：《南昌大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 公安機(jī)關(guān) 調(diào)解 民事糾紛 大調(diào)解

【摘要】：隨著改革開放的深入,由社會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)型、利益重新分配帶來生產(chǎn)和生活方式的巨大變化,人們價(jià)值觀取向也隨之趨向多元化。過去長(zhǎng)期積壓的深層次矛盾和改革發(fā)展過程中產(chǎn)生的新情況、新問題交織在一起,引發(fā)了一系列矛盾因素,嚴(yán)重影響了經(jīng)濟(jì)的健康發(fā)展和社會(huì)大局的穩(wěn)定有序。在此背景下,肩負(fù)打擊和預(yù)防違法犯罪雙重職能、以維護(hù)社會(huì)穩(wěn)定和人民群眾生命財(cái)產(chǎn)安全為主要任務(wù)的公安機(jī)關(guān),廣泛參與民事糾紛的調(diào)解�；鶎庸矙C(jī)關(guān)面臨來自社會(huì)治安形勢(shì)的新挑戰(zhàn)愈來愈嚴(yán)峻,一些如經(jīng)濟(jì)糾紛、醫(yī)患糾紛、勞資債權(quán)等引發(fā)的矛盾糾紛和社會(huì)不安定因素大量增多,調(diào)解難度愈來愈大。 雖然公安機(jī)關(guān)調(diào)解民事糾紛相對(duì)訴訟而言具有便捷、高效等諸多優(yōu)點(diǎn),但由于公安機(jī)關(guān)調(diào)解民事糾紛的法律規(guī)范不夠完善、矛盾糾紛調(diào)解機(jī)制不夠成熟、公安機(jī)關(guān)中心工作過多、內(nèi)部缺少相應(yīng)的考核評(píng)價(jià)機(jī)制、警力不足、民警個(gè)人執(zhí)法素質(zhì)不一等原因,使民警在調(diào)解工作中難免顧此失彼,往往耗費(fèi)了大量的人力、財(cái)力、物力,卻未能收到理想的效果。 雖然公安機(jī)關(guān)調(diào)解民事糾紛還存在一系列的問題,但公安調(diào)解作為受當(dāng)事人青睞的消除紛爭(zhēng)的非訴訟糾紛解決方式,具有強(qiáng)大的生命力。因此,要改善現(xiàn)狀,首先應(yīng)該從法律制度上對(duì)公安機(jī)關(guān)調(diào)解民事糾紛的范圍、程序等方面予以規(guī)范,公安機(jī)關(guān)自身也應(yīng)強(qiáng)化調(diào)解工作原則、加強(qiáng)對(duì)糾紛調(diào)解工作考評(píng)與培訓(xùn)指導(dǎo)力度,以提升民警的糾紛調(diào)解能力；此外,還應(yīng)進(jìn)一步充分利用現(xiàn)有民事糾紛調(diào)解資源,使各部門分工明確、權(quán)責(zé)分明、互相配合,充分發(fā)揮各自的作用。在警力如此匱乏的現(xiàn)狀下,整合利用人民調(diào)解、行政調(diào)解和司法調(diào)解,建立一個(gè)綜合各職能部門的大調(diào)解平臺(tái),讓“三調(diào)聯(lián)動(dòng)”真正發(fā)揮實(shí)效,既是緩解公安工作壓力的當(dāng)務(wù)之急,同時(shí)也是為民服務(wù)、構(gòu)建和諧社會(huì)的當(dāng)務(wù)之急。
[Abstract]:With the deepening of reform and opening-up, the transformation of the society, redistribution of interests brought tremendous change of production and way of life, people's values orientation is also diversified. The new situation generated in the past a long backlog of deep-seated contradictions and in the process of development and reform, new problems are intertwined, triggered a series of contradictory factors, serious influence the healthy development of the economy and the stability of the overall social order. In this context, has dual functions of striking and preventing crimes, to maintain social stability and the safety of people's lives and property as the main task of the public security organs, widely involved in civil dispute mediation. Facing the grass-roots public security organs from social security situation more and more severe challenges. Some such as economic disputes, medical disputes, labor disputes and claims caused social unrest increased dramatically, more and more large. The difficulty of mediation
Although the public security organs mediation of civil disputes litigation is relatively convenient, high efficiency and many other advantages, but because of the legal norms of public security organs mediation of civil disputes is not perfect, the contradictory dispute mediation mechanism is not mature enough, the public security organs work too much, lack of internal assessment mechanism, the lack of police, police law enforcement quality is not a reason. The police in the mediation work will care for this and lose that often spend a lot of manpower, material resources, financial resources, and has not received the desired results.
Although the public security organs mediation of civil disputes are a series of problems, but the public security mediation by the parties as a favor to remove non litigation disputes, has strong vitality. Therefore, to improve the situation, should be the first solution range of civil disputes from the legal system of the public security organs, procedures and other aspects to regulate the public security the authorities should strengthen the mediation work principle, strengthen the dispute mediation work evaluation and training and guidance, to enhance the ability of police mediation; in addition, should also make full use of the existing civil dispute mediation, make a clear division of labor, responsibility, mutual cooperation, give full play to their role in the current situation so police. The lack of integration, the use of people's mediation, administrative mediation and judicial mediation mediation, establish a comprehensive platform for each department, so the three tune linkage really The actual effect is not only urgent to relieve the pressure of public security work, but also the urgent task for the people to serve the people and build a harmonious society.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：南昌大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：D922.14;D631

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李曉楊;;公安派出所民事糾紛調(diào)解正當(dāng)性初析[J];南昌教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年01期

2 陳廷超;;試論新形勢(shì)下民事糾紛的調(diào)解工作[J];法制與社會(huì);2011年10期

3 彭震;;論我國(guó)行政調(diào)解協(xié)議的法律效力[J];中南財(cái)經(jīng)政法大學(xué)研究生學(xué)報(bào);2009年06期

4 陳龍;;淺析當(dāng)前基層公安機(jī)關(guān)調(diào)處工作存在的問題及對(duì)策[J];上海公安高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2009年05期

5 沈惠章;;論治安糾紛調(diào)解工作面臨的問題及其理念的創(chuàng)新[J];上海公安高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2009年04期

6 高文英;;警察調(diào)解制度研究[J];中國(guó)人民公安大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年04期

7 鄭素一;;論公安機(jī)關(guān)的行政調(diào)解制度[J];行政與法;2008年07期

8 趙石麟;;公安調(diào)解與我國(guó)法制現(xiàn)代化[J];江西公安專科學(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2007年06期

9 章文巍;陳典磊;;公安機(jī)關(guān)行政調(diào)解范圍之分析與思考[J];法制與社會(huì);2007年11期

10 侯成林;倪斌;;非警務(wù)活動(dòng)初探[J];江蘇警官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年03期

，

本文編號(hào)：1359513