【摘要】：嚴格說來,學者考查出來的早期長征用詞不能作為長征概念理解和對待。毛澤東在瓦窯堡黨的活動分子會議上全面反思和總結(jié)全國主力紅軍戰(zhàn)略轉(zhuǎn)移的歷史,真正賦予長征以概念意義,從而將長征作為歷史概念確立起來。毛澤東將長征概括為中國的三支主力紅軍"作陣地的大轉(zhuǎn)移",最早定義長征,成為人們明確長征概念的內(nèi)涵基本遵循;石仲泉先生提出的"3+1"的長征是進一步地明確長征概念的外延,而非重新定義長征。同樣是在瓦窯堡黨的活動分子會議上,毛澤東對長征概念的外延作出界定,成為現(xiàn)在人們認識長征概念的外延的基礎(chǔ);石仲泉先生將紅六軍團西征視為長征,具有邏輯和歷史的一致性,但是將紅七軍團北上和西路軍西進也視為長征,未免需要深究。
[Abstract]:Strictly speaking, the early long March words examined by scholars can not be understood and treated as the concept of long March. At the meeting of activists of the Wayaobao Party, Mao Zedong comprehensively reflected and summarized the history of the strategic transfer of the main Red Army of the whole country, truly endowed the long March with conceptual significance, and thus established the long March as a historical concept. Mao Zedong summed up the long March as the "great transfer of positions" among the three main Red Army of China, and first defined the long March, which became the basic follow of people's clear connotation of the concept of long March. The long March proposed by Mr. Shi Zhongquan was to further clarify the extension of the concept of long March, not to redefine the long March. Also at the meeting of activists of the Wayaobao Party, Mao Zedong defined the extension of the concept of the long March, which became the basis for people to understand the extension of the concept of the long March. Mr. Shi Zhongquan regarded the West March of the Red six Legion as the long March, with logical and historical consistency, but it is necessary to study the northward march of the Seventh Army and the westward advance of the West Road Army.
【作者單位】： 遼東學院思想政治理論課教學科研部;
【分類號】：D231

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 黃中樞;利沖坳伏擊戰(zhàn)[J];廣西黨史;1994年04期

2 ;編者的話[J];絲綢譯叢;1979年01期

3 張皓;論國民黨軍閥的內(nèi)部矛盾對紅軍戰(zhàn)略轉(zhuǎn)移的影響[J];中共黨史研究;2001年01期

4 權(quán)恩奉;偉大的戰(zhàn)略轉(zhuǎn)移——紀念中國工農(nóng)紅軍長征勝利60周年[J];理論學刊;1996年05期

5 宇超;紅軍長征簡況[J];人民論壇;1996年08期

，

本文編號：2520312