【摘要】：延安時(shí)期,中國(guó)共產(chǎn)黨開(kāi)展整風(fēng)運(yùn)動(dòng),加速了馬克思主義中國(guó)化的進(jìn)程,使得干部思想得到極大的提升,并使全黨達(dá)到了空前的團(tuán)結(jié)也逐漸成熟起來(lái)。這時(shí)期,中國(guó)共產(chǎn)黨在處理知識(shí)分子問(wèn)題上,出現(xiàn)了“王實(shí)味事件”特例。學(xué)術(shù)界對(duì)王實(shí)味問(wèn)題的研究已達(dá)成了一些共識(shí),但研究中仍存在一些爭(zhēng)議性問(wèn)題。對(duì)王實(shí)味研究中的爭(zhēng)議性問(wèn)題進(jìn)行評(píng)析,既可以深化王實(shí)味的研究,又能正確認(rèn)識(shí)延安時(shí)期黨與知識(shí)分子關(guān)系的歷史;而且可以對(duì)解決當(dāng)今的文藝與政治關(guān)系問(wèn)題、中國(guó)共產(chǎn)黨的知識(shí)分子政策問(wèn)題等重大命題提供歷史借鑒。王實(shí)味研究中存在的爭(zhēng)議性問(wèn)題主要集中在:王實(shí)味“托派”帽子問(wèn)題、王實(shí)味作品暴露延安“陰暗面”問(wèn)題、王實(shí)味與丁玲整風(fēng)不同結(jié)局問(wèn)題、王實(shí)味之死問(wèn)題。這些問(wèn)題都與毛澤東有著不同程度的聯(lián)系,因此評(píng)析王實(shí)味問(wèn)題與毛澤東的關(guān)系構(gòu)成了論文的主脈絡(luò)。將王實(shí)味人生經(jīng)歷作為立論的基礎(chǔ),是因?yàn)橥鯇?shí)味事件的成因中,個(gè)人性格是極為重要的因素,而人生經(jīng)歷對(duì)王實(shí)味性格的形成又有重要的影響;對(duì)王實(shí)味托派帽子問(wèn)題評(píng)析,主要回應(yīng)托派帽子是否由毛澤東扣上的問(wèn)題;對(duì)王實(shí)味作品暴露延安“陰暗面”問(wèn)題評(píng)析,主要回應(yīng)王實(shí)味作品是否真實(shí)反映當(dāng)時(shí)延安的實(shí)際情況問(wèn)題;對(duì)王實(shí)味與丁玲整風(fēng)不同結(jié)局問(wèn)題評(píng)析,主要回應(yīng)王實(shí)味和丁玲作品所表現(xiàn)出的問(wèn)題大體相同,卻在整風(fēng)中有不同的結(jié)局,這與毛澤東是否有關(guān)的問(wèn)題;對(duì)王實(shí)味之死問(wèn)題評(píng)析,主要回應(yīng)王實(shí)味之死是否由毛澤東一手造成,毛澤東是否借王實(shí)味事件來(lái)打擊知識(shí)分子等問(wèn)題。論文在馬克思主義理論的指導(dǎo)下,堅(jiān)持辯證唯物主義和歷史唯物主義,考證王實(shí)味研究者在爭(zhēng)議性問(wèn)題論述中所使用史料的真?zhèn)�、辨別研究者研究方法的科學(xué)性、探析研究者的立場(chǎng)和價(jià)值觀。一切還原到客觀的歷史語(yǔ)境中,用正確的史實(shí)和文獻(xiàn)資料論述,才能全面客觀地對(duì)爭(zhēng)議問(wèn)題作出評(píng)析。
[Abstract]:During the Yan'an period, the Communist Party of China launched the rectification movement, accelerated the process of Marxism in China, greatly promoted the cadres' thought, and made the whole party achieve unprecedented unity and gradually matured. In this period, the Communist Party of China in dealing with the issue of intellectuals, the emergence of "Wang Shiwei incident" special cases. The academic circles have reached some consensus on Wang Shiwei, but there are still some controversial problems in the research. By analyzing the controversial issues in Wang Shiwei's study, we can not only deepen the research of Wang Shiwei, but also correctly understand the history of the relationship between the Party and the intellectuals during the Yan'an period, and we can also solve the problem of the relationship between literature and art and political relations today. The Communist Party of China's intellectual policy issues and other major propositions to provide historical reference. The controversial problems existing in Wang Shiwei's research are mainly focused on: the question of the "commissioned" hat by Wang Shiwei, the "dark side" of Yanan exposed by Wang Shiwei's works, the different ending problem of the rectifying movement of Wang Shiwei and the question of the death of Wang Shiwei. All these problems are related to Mao Zedong to some extent, so the analysis of the relationship between Wang Shiwei problem and Mao Zedong constitutes the main thread of the thesis. Taking Wang Shiwei's life experience as the basis of his theory is because among the causes of the Wang Shiwei incident, personal character is an extremely important factor, and life experience has an important impact on the formation of Wang Shiwei's personality. The main answer is whether Mao Zedong buckled the hat of the Torto faction, comment on the "dark side" of Wang Shiwei's works, and mainly respond to whether the works really reflect the actual situation of Yan'an at that time. Commenting on the different endings of Wang Shiwei and Ding Ling rectification movement, we mainly respond to the same problems in the works of Wang Shiwei and Wang Shiwei, but have different endings in the rectification movement. To comment on Wang Shiwei's death, the main answer is whether the death of Wang Shiwei was caused by Mao Zedong alone, and whether Mao Zedong took advantage of the incident to crack down on intellectuals and so on. Under the guidance of Marxist theory, the thesis adheres to dialectical materialism and historical materialism, verifies the authenticity of historical materials used by Wang Shiwei researchers in the discussion of controversial issues, and distinguishes the scientific nature of the research methods of the researchers. Probe into the standpoint and values of the researcher. Only when everything is restored to the objective historical context and the correct historical facts and documents are discussed can the controversial issues be comprehensively and objectively evaluated.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湘潭大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D231

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 吳繼金;;延安時(shí)期的雜文風(fēng)波[J];鐘山風(fēng)雨;2016年03期

2 馬婧;;王實(shí)味研究述評(píng)[J];太原大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2014年02期

3 李維民;;檔案中的王實(shí)味死因[J];炎黃春秋;2013年06期

4 緋石;;追懷王實(shí)味:從師生到夫妻(上)[J];新文學(xué)史料;2012年03期

5 明飛龍;;1942延安文學(xué)事件中的大歷史與小故事——王實(shí)味命運(yùn)考察[J];理論月刊;2012年08期

6 張s，

本文編號(hào)：2259151