國家監(jiān)察體制改革要注重對監(jiān)察權(quán)性質(zhì)的研究
[Abstract]:The supervisory committee and the Party's disciplinary inspection organs work together to achieve the goal of the anti-corruption system, which inevitably leads to the problem of both exercising the supervisory power together. From the angle of political constitutional law, the supervisory power with Chinese characteristics can be divided into two parts: one is the supervisory power of the nature of political power extended from the ruling power of the party, the legitimacy of this supervisory power comes from the principle of the party in charge of cadres; The other part is the state supervisory power which needs to be operated with the aid of the state power system. This kind of supervisory power should be included in the operation system of the state power established by the constitution and the law as well as the operation order of the legal supervision power. Based on the nature and function of the supervisory power, although the supervisory committee set up in the current state supervisory system reform is elected by the people's Congress at the same level, it is responsible to the people's Congress at the same level. However, it is not necessary to report the work to the people's Congress at the same level, but to the supervisory organ at the higher level. The supervisory committee has not changed the structure of the legal supervision power in the state power system. Instead, by grasping the main line of building a clean and honest government of party members, cadres, and public officials exercising public power in state organs, the state organs in the state power system further strengthen the power of personnel supervision over their staff by various state organs. Thus constitute the system of anti-corruption system, and further improve the efficiency of anti-corruption mechanism. The supervisory power with Chinese characteristics created in the reform of the state supervisory system can not only further consolidate the ruling power of the Party, but also further optimize the operation effect of the legal supervisory power in the state power system, and form a new pattern of anti-corruption work.
【作者單位】: 中國社會科學(xué)院法學(xué)研究所;
【分類號】:D262.6
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 劉漢卿;翟洪峰;;我國紀(jì)檢監(jiān)察體制研究綜述[J];黨政干部學(xué)刊;2013年11期
2 趙蘇敏;建立黨內(nèi)相對獨立的監(jiān)察體制[J];理論學(xué)刊;1986年11期
3 李加強(qiáng);;改革國有企業(yè)紀(jì)檢監(jiān)察體制 提高紀(jì)檢監(jiān)察效力[J];中國集體經(jīng)濟(jì);2011年22期
4 劉漢卿;翟洪峰;;對新中國紀(jì)檢監(jiān)察體制的研究綜述[J];北京黨史;2013年06期
5 張光義;;對紀(jì)檢監(jiān)察體制方面幾個問題的思考及其改革的建議[J];組織人事學(xué)研究;1996年05期
6 胡洪飛;;關(guān)于國有企業(yè)紀(jì)檢監(jiān)察體制創(chuàng)新的實踐與思考[J];開發(fā)研究;2009年S1期
7 劉經(jīng)國;;對國有企業(yè)紀(jì)檢監(jiān)察體制創(chuàng)新的思考[J];化工管理;2010年05期
8 任鐵纓;;略論“健全紀(jì)檢監(jiān)察體制”[J];中國黨政干部論壇;2013年09期
9 楊晶;唐友;朱海英;;從“畏手畏腳”到“放開手腳”——透視基層紀(jì)檢監(jiān)察體制改革的船山實踐[J];四川黨的建設(shè)(城市版);2010年05期
10 胡洪飛;;國企反腐倡廉建設(shè)的生動實踐——中國石化廣東石油分公司改革完善紀(jì)檢監(jiān)察體制紀(jì)實[J];中國監(jiān)察;2009年11期
相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前10條
1 記者 邵雪廉 黃賁;深化紀(jì)檢監(jiān)察體制改革 提升反腐倡廉工作水平[N];金華日報;2014年
2 張冰;加強(qiáng)農(nóng)村黨風(fēng)廉政建設(shè)[N];哈爾濱日報;2008年
3 通訊員 杜貴斌;嘉祥實施紀(jì)檢監(jiān)察體制改革[N];濟(jì)寧日報;2010年
4 趙擎;完善紀(jì)檢監(jiān)察體制 擔(dān)起反腐倡廉重任[N];紹興日報;2007年
5 記者 張福先;改革的根本目的是強(qiáng)化基層黨風(fēng)廉政建設(shè)[N];大慶日報;2008年
6 劉興東;我黨第一個紀(jì)檢機(jī)構(gòu)[N];檢察日報;2003年
7 中共慶陽市委常委、紀(jì)委書記 李學(xué)宏;切實履行好基層紀(jì)委監(jiān)督職能[N];甘肅日報;2014年
8 侯少文;歷史上的黨內(nèi)監(jiān)督機(jī)構(gòu)[N];學(xué)習(xí)時報;2002年
9 記者 林立平;何勇會見印度中央監(jiān)察委員會主任[N];人民日報;2006年
10 彭勁秀;黨內(nèi)監(jiān)督機(jī)構(gòu)的創(chuàng)設(shè)、取消與重建[N];民主與法制時報;2013年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前6條
1 殷延威;健全紀(jì)檢監(jiān)察體制機(jī)制研究[D];華中師范大學(xué);2015年
2 李春曉;十八大以來我國紀(jì)檢監(jiān)察體制改革研究[D];東北師范大學(xué);2016年
3 張東方;我國監(jiān)察體制改革若干問題思考[D];中國社會科學(xué)院研究生院;2017年
4 李作祿;大連市鄉(xiāng)鎮(zhèn)街道紀(jì)檢監(jiān)察體制機(jī)制創(chuàng)新研究[D];大連理工大學(xué);2010年
5 劉漢卿;建國以來紀(jì)檢監(jiān)察體制的歷史演進(jìn)及其改革路徑研究[D];南京師范大學(xué);2014年
6 周芳;制度反腐視野下優(yōu)化紀(jì)檢監(jiān)察體制的對策研究[D];云南大學(xué);2015年
,本文編號:2218933
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/dangjiandangzheng/2218933.html