【摘要】：20世紀(jì)50年代,"麻雀"成為"害人鳥(niǎo)"的話(huà)語(yǔ)塑造與同時(shí)期開(kāi)展的整風(fēng)運(yùn)動(dòng)到反右派斗爭(zhēng)之間存在密切關(guān)聯(lián)。"雙百"到"整風(fēng)"使"麻雀"成為討論熱點(diǎn),反右派斗爭(zhēng)的推進(jìn)則使麻雀問(wèn)題日益被賦予政治意義,逐漸被塑造成"害人鳥(niǎo)"。上海輿論宣傳領(lǐng)域反右派斗爭(zhēng)進(jìn)程中的關(guān)鍵事件在"麻雀"與"運(yùn)動(dòng)"間建立起種種或明或隱的關(guān)聯(lián)。無(wú)論是作為"科學(xué)范疇"的討論,還是以"社會(huì)運(yùn)動(dòng)"敘述模式呈現(xiàn)的"麻雀"問(wèn)題討論,歸根結(jié)底都是作為輿論宣傳的不同表現(xiàn)形式,展示出多重關(guān)系的復(fù)雜歷史圖景。
[Abstract]:In the 1950s, there was a close relationship between the discourse shaping of the "sparrow" as a "bird killer" and the rectification movement carried out at the same time and the struggle against the right. " Shuangbai to "rectification" made the "sparrow" a hot topic of discussion, and the promotion of the struggle against the right made the issue of sparrow increasingly political and gradually shaped as "killing birds". The key events in the struggle against the Rightists in the field of public opinion and propaganda in Shanghai have established various or implicit connections between the "sparrow" and the "movement". Whether it is a discussion of "scientific category" or a discussion of "sparrow" as a narrative mode of "social movement", it is, in the final analysis, a complex historical picture of multiple relations as different forms of public opinion propaganda.
【作者單位】： 復(fù)旦大學(xué)歷史學(xué)系;
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D231

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 華崞;;60年前的一次動(dòng)遷[J];上海房地;2011年09期

2 ;黨史展里的“豆腐賬”[J];黨的建設(shè);2001年10期

，

本文編號(hào)：2177611