1945-1949：國共兩黨在國統(tǒng)區(qū)爭奪青年問題研究
發(fā)布時間：2018-07-13 11:59
【摘要】：青年是中國近代以來推動社會變革的重要力量,是最富活力的社會群體,爭取到青年就是爭取到未來。1945—1949年,國共兩黨出于自身事業(yè)需要,在青年問題上展開了激烈較量。歷史已經(jīng)表明,共產(chǎn)黨把青年運動與人民群眾運動密切聯(lián)系,形成了愛國民主第二條戰(zhàn)線,將青年運動推向了中國青年運動歷史最高峰,最終贏得了廣泛的青年群眾。 這一時期是國際兩大陣營對立形成,中國國內(nèi)軍事上陷入全國性內(nèi)戰(zhàn)、經(jīng)濟上爆發(fā)嚴重經(jīng)濟危機、政治上各方力量相互對抗和制約。正是在這樣的背景下,國共兩黨圍繞國統(tǒng)區(qū)青年問題展開了思想交鋒和組織爭奪。對這一時期國共兩黨在國統(tǒng)區(qū)爭奪青年問題進行研究,不僅有利于正確認識這段歷史,更能使我們總結(jié)經(jīng)驗和教訓,舉一反三,為今天青年工作提供一定的參考。本文采用歷史分析法、比較研究法和歸納總結(jié)法,從五個方面對這一時期國共兩黨在國統(tǒng)區(qū)爭奪青年問題進行了研究： 第一部分交代了研究緣由、研究現(xiàn)狀和研究意義以及研究方法。 第二部分簡要介紹了國共兩黨爭奪青年的時代背景。認為國共兩黨爭奪青年是在國際反法西斯戰(zhàn)爭勝利與兩大陣營對立形成的國際形勢背景下進行的,是在通貨膨脹、民不聊生與國民黨政府專制腐敗的國內(nèi)時局背景下進行的,是在戰(zhàn)后國共兩黨兩個中國之命運的分歧及各自青年思想路線影響下進行的。 第三部分重點闡述了國共兩黨爭奪青年開展的思想交鋒。指出國民黨需要嚴格控制“青年流竄之共匪區(qū)”,共產(chǎn)黨也需要“為著粉碎蔣介石的進攻,必須和人民群眾親密合作,必須爭取一切可能爭取的人”,為此就對待駐華美軍行為的態(tài)度、國統(tǒng)區(qū)經(jīng)濟惡化的基本認識、中國民主前途路線之爭、政權(quán)穩(wěn)定與青年權(quán)益的認識等重點問題展開思想交鋒。 第四部分著重探討了國共兩黨圍繞青年問題展開的組織爭奪。指出國共兩黨對自身組織機構(gòu)及其外圍組織和關聯(lián)團體進行了全面部署和優(yōu)化調(diào)整,具體為：國民黨改組設立“青年復學就業(yè)輔導會”,共產(chǎn)黨則設置“城市工作部”；國民黨推出“黨團合并”舉措,共產(chǎn)黨采取“三線設置”辦法。 第五部分論述了共產(chǎn)黨在國統(tǒng)區(qū)開展青年工作的經(jīng)驗與啟示。認為重視愛國主義教育,是開展青年工作的基本方略；注重思想理論宣傳引導,是開展青年工作的必備武器；堅持黨對青年思想政治工作的領導,是開展青年工作的根本保證；團結(jié)一切可以團結(jié)的力量,是開展青年工作的一大法寶；解決生活實際問題,是贏得青年的關鍵所在。這些成功經(jīng)驗對今天我們做好青年工作仍然具有重要的參考價值和借鑒意義。
[Abstract]:Youth is an important force to promote social change in modern China and the most vigorous social group. To win youth is to win over the future. 1945-1949, the KMT and CPC launched a fierce contest on youth issues out of the need of their own cause. History has shown that the Communist Party has closely linked the youth movement with the mass movement of the people, formed the second front of patriotic democracy, pushed the youth movement to the highest point in the history of the Chinese youth movement, and finally won a wide range of young people. In this period, the two international camps were in opposition, China fell into a national civil war militarily, economic crisis broke out, and political forces confronted and restricted each other. It is against this background that the Kuomintang and the Communist Party have launched ideological confrontation and organizational competition around youth issues in the Kuomintang-controlled areas. The study of the struggle for youth between the Kuomintang and the Communist Party of China in this period is not only conducive to the correct understanding of this history, but also enables us to sum up experience and lessons, draw lessons from one another, and provide a certain reference for today's youth work. This article uses the historical analysis method, the comparison research method and the induction summary method, has carried on the research from the five aspects to this period, the Kuomintang and the Communist Party competes for the youth question in the national control area: the first part has explained the research reason, Research status, significance and research methods. The second part briefly introduces the background of the two parties fighting for youth. It is believed that the struggle for youth between the Kuomintang and the Communist Party was conducted against the background of the international situation in which the victory of the international anti-fascist war and the opposition between the two major camps took place, and against the background of the domestic situation of inflation, the despotism of the people and the dictatorship and corruption of the Kuomintang government. It was carried out under the influence of the difference of the destiny of the two parties and the two Chinas after the war and the ideological line of their respective youth. The third part focuses on the ideological confrontation between the Kuomintang and the Communist Party for youth development. It is pointed out that the Kuomintang needs to strictly control the "Communist bandit areas where young people are on the move" and the Communist Party needs "to crush the attack of Jiang Jieshi, to work closely with the masses of the people and to fight for everyone who can". Therefore, there is an ideological confrontation between the key issues such as the attitude towards the behavior of the US troops in China, the basic understanding of the deterioration of the economy in the areas under national control, the struggle for the future of China's democracy, and the understanding of the stability of political power and the rights and interests of young people. The fourth part mainly discusses the organizational competition between the Kuomintang and the Communist Party around youth issues. It is pointed out that the Kuomintang and the Communist Party of China have made an overall arrangement and optimized adjustment to their own organizations and their peripheral organizations and related organizations. The concrete measures are as follows: the Kuomintang reorganizes and sets up the Youth Rehabilitation and Employment Advisory Committee, while the Communist Party sets up the City work Department; KMT launched the "Youth League merger", the Communist Party adopted the "three-line setup" method. The fifth part discusses the experience and enlightenment of the Communist Party in carrying out youth work in the Kuomintang-controlled areas. It is believed that paying attention to patriotism education is the basic strategy of youth work, paying attention to ideological and theoretical propaganda and guidance, is the necessary weapon to carry out youth work, insisting on the leadership of the Party to youth ideological and political work, is the fundamental guarantee of carrying out youth work. Uniting all forces that can be United is a magic weapon for youth work, and solving practical problems in life is the key to winning young people. These successful experiences still have important reference value and significance for us to do a good job in youth work today.
【學位授予單位】：海南大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D231;D432.6
本文編號：2119301
[Abstract]:Youth is an important force to promote social change in modern China and the most vigorous social group. To win youth is to win over the future. 1945-1949, the KMT and CPC launched a fierce contest on youth issues out of the need of their own cause. History has shown that the Communist Party has closely linked the youth movement with the mass movement of the people, formed the second front of patriotic democracy, pushed the youth movement to the highest point in the history of the Chinese youth movement, and finally won a wide range of young people. In this period, the two international camps were in opposition, China fell into a national civil war militarily, economic crisis broke out, and political forces confronted and restricted each other. It is against this background that the Kuomintang and the Communist Party have launched ideological confrontation and organizational competition around youth issues in the Kuomintang-controlled areas. The study of the struggle for youth between the Kuomintang and the Communist Party of China in this period is not only conducive to the correct understanding of this history, but also enables us to sum up experience and lessons, draw lessons from one another, and provide a certain reference for today's youth work. This article uses the historical analysis method, the comparison research method and the induction summary method, has carried on the research from the five aspects to this period, the Kuomintang and the Communist Party competes for the youth question in the national control area: the first part has explained the research reason, Research status, significance and research methods. The second part briefly introduces the background of the two parties fighting for youth. It is believed that the struggle for youth between the Kuomintang and the Communist Party was conducted against the background of the international situation in which the victory of the international anti-fascist war and the opposition between the two major camps took place, and against the background of the domestic situation of inflation, the despotism of the people and the dictatorship and corruption of the Kuomintang government. It was carried out under the influence of the difference of the destiny of the two parties and the two Chinas after the war and the ideological line of their respective youth. The third part focuses on the ideological confrontation between the Kuomintang and the Communist Party for youth development. It is pointed out that the Kuomintang needs to strictly control the "Communist bandit areas where young people are on the move" and the Communist Party needs "to crush the attack of Jiang Jieshi, to work closely with the masses of the people and to fight for everyone who can". Therefore, there is an ideological confrontation between the key issues such as the attitude towards the behavior of the US troops in China, the basic understanding of the deterioration of the economy in the areas under national control, the struggle for the future of China's democracy, and the understanding of the stability of political power and the rights and interests of young people. The fourth part mainly discusses the organizational competition between the Kuomintang and the Communist Party around youth issues. It is pointed out that the Kuomintang and the Communist Party of China have made an overall arrangement and optimized adjustment to their own organizations and their peripheral organizations and related organizations. The concrete measures are as follows: the Kuomintang reorganizes and sets up the Youth Rehabilitation and Employment Advisory Committee, while the Communist Party sets up the City work Department; KMT launched the "Youth League merger", the Communist Party adopted the "three-line setup" method. The fifth part discusses the experience and enlightenment of the Communist Party in carrying out youth work in the Kuomintang-controlled areas. It is believed that paying attention to patriotism education is the basic strategy of youth work, paying attention to ideological and theoretical propaganda and guidance, is the necessary weapon to carry out youth work, insisting on the leadership of the Party to youth ideological and political work, is the fundamental guarantee of carrying out youth work. Uniting all forces that can be United is a magic weapon for youth work, and solving practical problems in life is the key to winning young people. These successful experiences still have important reference value and significance for us to do a good job in youth work today.
【學位授予單位】：海南大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D231;D432.6
【參考文獻】
相關期刊論文 前10條
1 張小強;;美蘇冷戰(zhàn)與中國內(nèi)戰(zhàn)的關系——中國內(nèi)戰(zhàn)結(jié)構(gòu)性原因探析[J];北華大學學報(社會科學版);2008年03期
2 李燕;周良書;;“校園黨爭”:中共高校黨建的對策分析[J];當代世界與社會主義;2010年06期
3 丁梅君 ,劉紅;解放戰(zhàn)爭時期鄂豫根據(jù)地減租布告[J];湖北檔案;2003年07期
4 嚴海建;;淺析1924-1949年中國國民黨意識形態(tài)層面的劣勢[J];民國檔案;2006年02期
5 胡人;思想政治工作是一切工作的生命線[J];貴州社會科學;1991年12期
6 白書祥;;思想政治教育導向功能對社會穩(wěn)定的促進作用探析[J];貴州社會科學;2009年04期
7 陶海洋;解放戰(zhàn)爭時期鄧小平對思想政治工作的貢獻[J];華東船舶工業(yè)學院學報(社會科學版);2003年03期
8 邱紅梅;龔喜林;;戰(zhàn)后初期的行政院善后救濟總署業(yè)績述論[J];黃岡師范學院學報;2009年05期
9 王政莉;;解放戰(zhàn)爭時期的青輔會研究[J];衡水學院學報;2009年06期
10 牛崇輝;劉少奇與解放戰(zhàn)爭時期的土地改革[J];淮陰師范學院學報(哲學社會科學版);1998年04期
，本文編號：2119301
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/dangjiandangzheng/2119301.html
