本文選題：中共概念史 + 實(shí)踐歷史　； 參考：《中共黨史研究》2017年11期

【摘要】：以中共歷史概念為主體對(duì)象的中共概念史研究,是中共歷史學(xué)的一個(gè)研究分支或類(lèi)型。由于中共歷史學(xué)作為整體性的學(xué)科,面對(duì)的是不同的實(shí)踐史事研究對(duì)象,這就導(dǎo)致了在方法 (技藝)上,既存在整體性的研究方法,也存在具體性的研究方法。中共概念史研究具有自身的具體研究方法,亦即研究技藝——技術(shù)性方法。討論中共概念史的研究技藝,不僅僅是一種方法論的問(wèn)題,更涉及對(duì)這種方法論認(rèn)知的理論問(wèn)題。因此,對(duì)中共概念史的研究技藝進(jìn)行分析,不能不建立在相關(guān)的理論認(rèn)知基礎(chǔ)上。要避免研究技藝的誤用,不能不首先對(duì)研究對(duì)象的性質(zhì)作出判斷。在這個(gè)意義上講,理論認(rèn)知決定研究技藝的運(yùn)用。
[Abstract]:The study of the history of the CPC concept is a branch or type of the history of the Communist Party of China. As a holistic subject, the history of the Communist Party of China is confronted with different objects of practical history, which leads to the existence of both holistic and concrete research methods in the field of methods (techniques). The study of the history of the CPC concept has its own specific research method, that is, the research technique-technical method. Discussing the research technique of the history of CPC concept is not only a problem of methodology, but also a theoretical problem of cognition of this methodology. Therefore, the study of the history of the CPC concept must be based on the relevant theoretical cognition. In order to avoid the misuse of research techniques, we must first judge the nature of the object of study. In this sense, theoretical cognition determines the application of research techniques.
【作者單位】： 中共福建省委黨校;
【基金】：國(guó)家社會(huì)科學(xué)基金項(xiàng)目“中共黨史研究科學(xué)化中的概念史問(wèn)題研究”(14BDJ024)的階段性成果
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D239
，

本文編號(hào)：1951046