發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-04-26 02:37

  本文選題：《群眾》周刊 + 戰(zhàn)國(guó)策派��； 參考：《武漢大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：《群眾》周刊是抗日戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)時(shí)期和解放戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)時(shí)期,中國(guó)共產(chǎn)黨在國(guó)民黨統(tǒng)治區(qū)和香港地區(qū)唯一公開(kāi)出版的理論刊物,是中國(guó)共產(chǎn)黨的黨刊。本文立足于《群眾》周刊對(duì)"戰(zhàn)國(guó)策派"批判的文本,在簡(jiǎn)要介紹"戰(zhàn)國(guó)策派"的出現(xiàn)及其主張的基礎(chǔ)上,嘗試就《群眾》周刊批判"戰(zhàn)國(guó)策派"的原因、主要觀點(diǎn)、歷史作用與局限等做一番粗淺的討論。文章的第一部分為導(dǎo)論,主要交代了選題的緣起及研究?jī)r(jià)值、研究現(xiàn)狀、研究方法和研究的重點(diǎn)、難點(diǎn)、創(chuàng)新點(diǎn)。文章的第二部分主要概述了"戰(zhàn)國(guó)策派"的出現(xiàn)及其主張。在"戰(zhàn)國(guó)策派"的出現(xiàn)上,主要講述了"戰(zhàn)國(guó)策派"的概念和"戰(zhàn)國(guó)策派"主要代表人物;在"戰(zhàn)國(guó)策派"的主張上,主要介紹了文化形態(tài)史觀、"戰(zhàn)國(guó)時(shí)代重演"論、尚"力"、推崇尼采及其意志哲學(xué)、"狂飆運(yùn)動(dòng)"的借鑒及"五四新文化"反思和"民族文學(xué)運(yùn)動(dòng)"。文章的第三部分主要?dú)w納分析了《群眾》周刊對(duì)"戰(zhàn)國(guó)策派"的批判文章及其主要作者群體。在簡(jiǎn)述《群眾》周刊的創(chuàng)刊、宗旨和與《新華日?qǐng)?bào)》關(guān)系的基礎(chǔ)上,歸納分析了《群眾》周刊批判"戰(zhàn)國(guó)策派"的13篇相關(guān)文章和5位主要作者。文章的第四部分主要探討了《群眾》周刊對(duì)"戰(zhàn)國(guó)策派"批判的原因。本文認(rèn)為《群眾》周刊對(duì)"戰(zhàn)國(guó)策派"批判的原因主要有五點(diǎn):第一,"戰(zhàn)國(guó)策派"的英雄史觀和中國(guó)共產(chǎn)黨群眾觀的對(duì)立;第二,"戰(zhàn)國(guó)策派"污蔑了社會(huì)主義運(yùn)動(dòng)和蘇聯(lián);第三,中國(guó)共產(chǎn)黨應(yīng)對(duì)國(guó)內(nèi)外政治形勢(shì)的現(xiàn)實(shí)需要;第四,"戰(zhàn)國(guó)策派"是"法西斯主義的";第五,《群眾》周刊辦刊方向向思想理論斗爭(zhēng)的轉(zhuǎn)變。文章的第五部分主要論述了《群眾》周刊批判"戰(zhàn)國(guó)策派"的主要觀點(diǎn)。本文從"法西斯的哲學(xué)"、"歌頌暴力"的宇宙觀、"歷史循環(huán)論"、"法西斯主義"的政治觀、"法西斯思想的文藝觀"等五個(gè)方面進(jìn)行了梳理。文章的第六個(gè)部分總結(jié)了《群眾》周刊批判"戰(zhàn)國(guó)策派"的歷史作用與局限。本文認(rèn)為《群眾》周刊對(duì)"戰(zhàn)國(guó)策派"的批判具有較大的歷史作用,主要表現(xiàn)在駁斥了"戰(zhàn)國(guó)策派"不利于抗戰(zhàn)的言論,宣傳了唯物史觀。同時(shí),《群眾》周刊對(duì)"戰(zhàn)國(guó)策派"批判也有一定的歷史局限,主要表現(xiàn)在批判帶有簡(jiǎn)單化的傾向和部分論證存在問(wèn)題。
[Abstract]:Mass Weekly is the only theoretical publication published publicly by the Communist Party of China in the Kuomintang and Hong Kong areas during the War of Resistance against Japan and the War of Liberation. Based on the text of the criticism of the "warring States Strategy School" by the "masses" Weekly, and on the basis of a brief introduction to the emergence of the "warring States Strategy School" and its propositions, this paper attempts to make a major point of view on the reasons why the "warring States Policy School" was criticized by the "masses" Weekly. The historical function and limitation are discussed briefly. The first part of the article is an introduction, mainly explains the origin and research value of the topic, research status, research methods and research emphasis, difficulties, innovation points. The second part of the article mainly summarizes the emergence of the warring States Strategy School and its propositions. On the emergence of the "warring States Strategy School", it mainly describes the concept of "warring States Strategy School" and the main representative figure of "warring States Strategy School", and mainly introduces the historical view of cultural form and the theory of "the replay of warring States period" in the proposition of "warring States Strategy School". Still "the force", respected Nietzsche and his will philosophy, "the violent movement" use for reference, "May 4th new culture" introspection and "the national literature movement". The third part of the article mainly summarizes and analyzes the critical articles of the Weekly Weekly on the warring States Policy School and its main author groups. On the basis of a brief introduction to the establishment, purpose and relationship with Xinhua Daily, 13 articles and 5 main authors of the Weekly magazine criticizing "warring States Policy School" are summarized and analyzed. The fourth part of the article mainly discusses the reason why the Weekly Weekly criticizes the warring States Policy School. This paper holds that there are five main reasons for the criticism of the "warring States Strategy School" by the "masses" Weekly: first, the antagonism between the heroic historical view of the "warring States Strategy School" and the mass view of the Communist Party of China, the second, the vilification of the socialist movement and the Soviet Union by the "warring States Strategy School"; Third, the Communist Party of China meets the practical needs of the political situation at home and abroad; fourth, the "warring States Policy School" is "fascist"; and fifthly, the direction of running the weekly "masses" has changed to ideological and theoretical struggle. The fifth part of the article mainly discusses the main viewpoints of the Weekly magazine criticizing the warring States Policy School. This paper combs from five aspects: the philosophy of fascism, the cosmological view of "praising violence", the theory of historical cycle, the political view of "fascism" and the view of literature and art of fascist thought. The sixth part summarizes the historical function and limitation of the criticism of the warring States Policy School by the Mass Weekly. This paper holds that the criticism of the warring States Strategy School by the Mass Weekly has a great historical function, mainly in refuting the argument that the warring States Strategy School is unfavorable to the War of Resistance against Japan and propagating the historical materialism. At the same time, there are some historical limitations in the criticism of the "warring States Strategy School" by the "masses" Weekly, which is mainly manifested in the tendency of the criticism to be simplistic and the problems in some argumentation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：武漢大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D231

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 林燕喜;;試析抗戰(zhàn)時(shí)期戰(zhàn)國(guó)策派遭受批判的原因[J];莆田學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2014年01期

2 胡逢祥;;抗戰(zhàn)中的“戰(zhàn)國(guó)策派”及其史學(xué)[J];史林;2013年01期

3 袁繼鋒;;戰(zhàn)國(guó)策派研究述評(píng)[J];重慶大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年05期

4 周若清;;危亡變局下的理想、傳承與功利——淺議“戰(zhàn)國(guó)策”派產(chǎn)生的原因[J];長(zhǎng)沙大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2010年03期

5 潘漢瓊;;《群眾》周刊的風(fēng)雨歷程[J];武漢文博;2008年02期

6 余永和;;廿年來(lái)的戰(zhàn)國(guó)策派研究[J];遼寧行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年05期

7 胡尚元;;史學(xué)界的“大右派”——雷海宗[J];文史精華;2006年09期

8 朱鵬飛;“綿延”說(shuō)與柏格森生命哲學(xué)的興衰[J];西南民族大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社科版);2005年09期

9 王學(xué)振;戰(zhàn)國(guó)策派思想述評(píng)[J];重慶師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2005年01期

10 漆志平;政治觀念與現(xiàn)實(shí)選擇的沖突——解讀戰(zhàn)國(guó)策派的政治理念[J];東莞理工學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2003年02期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 葉金輝;“古典”與“浪漫”的非常態(tài)融合—陳銓思想與作品研究[D];南開(kāi)大學(xué);2013年

2 范生彪;中國(guó)馬克思主義文學(xué)批評(píng)話語(yǔ)模式研究[D];華中師范大學(xué);2013年

3 袁英;話語(yǔ)理論的知識(shí)譜系及其在中國(guó)的流變與重構(gòu)[D];華中師范大學(xué);2012年

4 路曉冰;文化綜合格局中的戰(zhàn)國(guó)策派[D];山東大學(xué);2006年

5 唐正芒;論南方局領(lǐng)導(dǎo)的大后方抗戰(zhàn)文化運(yùn)動(dòng)[D];中共中央黨校;1998年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 馬鷗亞;簡(jiǎn)析戰(zhàn)國(guó)策派的人格哲學(xué)[D];中共北京市委黨校;2015年

2 項(xiàng)淳一;中蘇論戰(zhàn)中中國(guó)共產(chǎn)黨的話語(yǔ)研究[D];云南大學(xué);2014年

3 林燕喜;戰(zhàn)國(guó)策派的文化形態(tài)史觀研究[D];福建師范大學(xué);2014年

4 皮嬌陽(yáng);抗戰(zhàn)時(shí)期重慶的中共報(bào)人群體研究[D];南昌大學(xué);2013年

5 嚴(yán)志;抗日戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)時(shí)期戰(zhàn)國(guó)策派的民族復(fù)興思想[D];湖南師范大學(xué);2013年

6 溫小平;抗戰(zhàn)后期國(guó)共兩個(gè)中國(guó)之命運(yùn)論戰(zhàn)研究[D];海南大學(xué);2012年

7 李建華;中西交融、返本開(kāi)新[D];華東師范大學(xué);2010年

8 朱法娟;20世紀(jì)30年代的北方左翼文化運(yùn)動(dòng)研究[D];中共中央黨校;2008年

9 王曉晶;林同濟(jì)史學(xué)思想述評(píng)[D];首都師范大學(xué);2007年

10 梁庇寒;“戰(zhàn)國(guó)策”派政治思想研究[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號(hào)：1804124