瞿秋白對(duì)國(guó)民黨中央執(zhí)行委員會(huì)會(huì)議議事錄之聲明
發(fā)布時(shí)間:2018-04-04 20:29
本文選題:議事錄 切入點(diǎn):楊天石 出處:《黨史研究與教學(xué)》2015年06期
【摘要】:正《候補(bǔ)執(zhí)行委員瞿秋白對(duì)于八月十九二十兩天之中央全體會(huì)議議事錄之聲明》,是瞿秋白,也是中國(guó)共產(chǎn)黨在第一次國(guó)共合作初期批評(píng)、反擊國(guó)民黨右派攻擊的重要文獻(xiàn)。楊天石《瞿秋白的〈聲明〉與國(guó)共兩黨的"分家"風(fēng)波》(《檔案與史學(xué)》1997年第2期;《黨史縱橫》2001年第12期),在中國(guó)大陸的刊物上第一次披露了這一文獻(xiàn)較為詳細(xì)的內(nèi)容,并作了深入的解讀。因不少大陸學(xué)者看不到瞿秋白的聲明的原文,于是談瞿秋白的聲明只能引用楊天石的文章,如劉小中等《瞿秋白年譜
[Abstract]:The statement of alternate Executive member Qu Qiubai on the Proceedings of the Central Plenary session of August 1922 is also an important document for the CPC to criticize the Kuomintang Rightists in the early stage of the first KMT cooperation.Yang Tianshi's < statement by Qu Qiubai] and the storm of "separation" between the Kuomintang and the Communist Party ("Archives and historiography" No. 2, 1997; "the History of the Party" No. 12, 2001). For the first time, the contents of this document have been disclosed in more detail in publications in mainland China.And has made the thorough interpretation.Because many mainland scholars can't see the original text of Qu Qiubai's statement, therefore, we can only refer to Yang Tianshi's article, such as Liu Xiaozhong's < Qu Qiubai chronicle, etc.
【作者單位】: 揚(yáng)州大學(xué)馬克思主義學(xué)院;
【分類號(hào)】:D231
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條
1 王建華;;英國(guó)護(hù)照小史[J];世界博覽;1992年06期
2 ;[J];;年期
,本文編號(hào):1711564
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/dangjiandangzheng/1711564.html
最近更新
教材專著