發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-04-04 04:32

  本文選題：腐敗容忍度　切入點(diǎn)：反腐效果　出處：《南昌大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：腐敗零容忍的社會(huì)環(huán)境是實(shí)現(xiàn)風(fēng)清氣正政治生態(tài)的基礎(chǔ)。十八大以來(lái),中央采取了一系列的反腐敗措施,但反腐敗效果是否影響公眾的腐敗容忍度則有待經(jīng)驗(yàn)研究驗(yàn)證。通過(guò)問(wèn)卷調(diào)查分析發(fā)現(xiàn),受訪者對(duì)腐敗的容忍度,尤其是黑色腐敗的容忍度普遍較低;利益相關(guān)度和黑色、灰色和白色三種腐敗現(xiàn)象的容忍度之間有顯著的正相關(guān)關(guān)系。反腐效果顯著影響公職人員對(duì)黑色腐敗的容忍度,但對(duì)非公職人員不顯著;反腐非預(yù)期后果顯著正向影響黑色和灰色腐敗容忍度,對(duì)非公職人員的影響更顯著。另外,地方經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展和個(gè)人經(jīng)濟(jì)狀況與灰色腐敗容忍度負(fù)相關(guān),但與白色和黑色腐敗容忍度關(guān)系不顯著。這些發(fā)現(xiàn)表明,社會(huì)的腐敗容忍度普遍偏低,但短期內(nèi)反腐效果越好,公職人員腐敗容忍度反而會(huì)更高。只有持之以恒的嚴(yán)厲反腐才能緩慢改變腐敗風(fēng)氣,形成零容忍的政治生態(tài)。發(fā)展經(jīng)濟(jì)和打擊影響公眾利益的腐敗,在反腐敗的同時(shí)改善政府回應(yīng)性和治理為官不為現(xiàn)象,也能有效降低社會(huì)的腐敗容忍度。
[Abstract]:The social environment of zero tolerance of corruption is the foundation of realizing the political ecology.Since the 18th National Congress, the Central Committee has taken a series of anti-corruption measures, but whether the anti-corruption effect affects the tolerance of public corruption needs empirical research and verification.Through the questionnaire survey, we found that the tolerance of corruption, especially black corruption, was generally low, and there was a significant positive correlation between interest correlation and tolerance of black, gray and white corruption.The effect of anti-corruption significantly affected the tolerance of public officials to black corruption, but not to non-public officials; the unintended consequences of anti-corruption significantly positively affected the tolerance of black and gray corruption, and the impact on non-public officials was more significant.In addition, local economic development and personal economic status were negatively correlated with the tolerance of grey corruption, but had no significant relationship with the tolerance of white and black corruption.These findings suggest that corruption tolerance in society is generally low, but in the short term the better the corruption tolerance of public officials will be.Only persistent and severe anti-corruption can slowly change the corrupt atmosphere and form the political ecology of zero tolerance.The development of economy and the fight against corruption which affect the public interest can also effectively reduce the tolerance of corruption in the society by improving the responsiveness of the government and the phenomenon of not acting as a government official while fighting against corruption.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南昌大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D262.6

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 曾明;章輝騰;;官員作風(fēng)、反腐努力與政府信任:大學(xué)生的視角[J];湘潭大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2016年02期

2 彭慶紅;潘春玲;;當(dāng)代青年對(duì)特權(quán)的認(rèn)知與態(tài)度調(diào)查分析[J];中國(guó)青年研究;2015年12期

3 周?chē)?;腐敗成因:一種社會(huì)文化心理的視角[J];廉政文化研究;2015年05期

4 朱琳;宮伏佳;;腐敗主客觀測(cè)量結(jié)果差異性研究[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)社會(huì)體制比較;2015年05期

5 肖云忠;張麗麗;;利益誘惑情境與腐敗事件的生成及控制——基于18個(gè)典型案例的分析[J];廉政文化研究;2015年03期

6 孫敬良;梅海;;腐敗與文化的回歸分析[J];華南農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2015年02期

7 曾明;鄭旭旭;章輝騰;;治理結(jié)構(gòu),權(quán)力機(jī)制與高校腐敗——基于117個(gè)高校腐敗案例的分析[J];廉政文化研究;2015年02期

8 倪星;孫宗鋒;;政府反腐敗力度與公眾清廉感知:差異及解釋——基于G省的實(shí)證分析[J];政治學(xué)研究;2015年01期

9 牛月永;;關(guān)于民主反腐的幾點(diǎn)思考[J];中央社會(huì)主義學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2014年05期

10 賀夏蓉;;強(qiáng)化對(duì)腐敗零容忍的主流文化[J];中國(guó)紀(jì)檢監(jiān)察;2014年17期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 吳玲娟;試論腐敗的成因與反腐敗制度建設(shè)[D];浙江大學(xué);2004年

，

本文編號(hào)：1708381