本文選題：長征　切入點(diǎn)：中國　出處：《廣西社會(huì)科學(xué)》2017年02期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：中國共產(chǎn)黨領(lǐng)導(dǎo)的二萬五千里長征與巴西"普列斯特斯縱隊(duì)"長征分別在各自國度的革命歷史上產(chǎn)生重要的意義,但由于主體動(dòng)機(jī)、指導(dǎo)思想、斗爭方式的差異,最終遭遇了不同的結(jié)局:前者是中國共產(chǎn)黨主動(dòng)應(yīng)對危機(jī)實(shí)行的戰(zhàn)略轉(zhuǎn)移,后者是普列斯特斯縱隊(duì)面臨困境的被動(dòng)選擇;前者是以實(shí)際行動(dòng)宣傳和踐行對共產(chǎn)主義的堅(jiān)定信仰,后者依靠理想行為和英雄主義的建構(gòu);前者發(fā)展了運(yùn)動(dòng)戰(zhàn)理論,后者停留在傳統(tǒng)斗爭的方式;前者形成了"長征精神",后者沒有提出自己的革命綱領(lǐng);前者走出了一條適合自己國情的革命道路,影響了中國歷史的發(fā)展,后者失去了民主革命運(yùn)動(dòng)的領(lǐng)導(dǎo)舞臺,導(dǎo)致政治僵局的出現(xiàn)。
[Abstract]:The 25,000 Li long March led by the Communist Party of China and the long March of the Brazilian "Prestes column" have important significance in the revolutionary history of their respective countries, respectively, but due to the differences in the main motive, guiding ideology, and the way of struggle, In the end, different outcomes were encountered: the former was a strategic shift of the CPC's initiative to deal with the crisis, and the latter was the passive choice of the Plestis column facing difficulties; the former propagated and practiced its firm belief in communism through practical actions. The latter relies on the construction of ideal behavior and heroism; the former develops the theory of mobile warfare, while the latter stays in the way of traditional struggle, the former forms the "long March spirit", and the latter does not put forward his own revolutionary program; The former has set out a revolutionary road suitable for its own national conditions, which has affected the development of Chinese history, while the latter has lost the leading stage of the democratic revolutionary movement, leading to the emergence of political deadlock.
【作者單位】： 海南大學(xué)政治與公共管理學(xué)院;武漢大學(xué)馬克思主義學(xué)院;
【分類號】：D231;D777.7
，

本文編號：1605591