批評性話語分析是自七十年代末由以Roger Fowler和Gunther Kress等為代表的西方語言學(xué)家發(fā)展起來的話語分析方法。批評語言學(xué)家所做的是分析話語的結(jié)構(gòu),進(jìn)行批評話語分析,從而尋找一些突出的政治的和意識形態(tài)的特征,借此揭示話語是如何建構(gòu)和再現(xiàn)權(quán)力關(guān)系的,增強(qiáng)人們的語言意識,提高他們對語言運(yùn)用的鑒賞能力。批評話語分析的最終目的是讓人們理解和揭示社會(huì)的不平等并最終抵制這種不平等。本文運(yùn)用標(biāo)記理論和認(rèn)知語言學(xué)的相關(guān)理論如隱喻、轉(zhuǎn)喻、凸顯-背景化、和范疇化的方法,對《紐約時(shí)報(bào)》中三篇關(guān)于5.12地震和北京奧運(yùn)會(huì)報(bào)道進(jìn)行分析并比較《中國日報(bào)》中對同一事件的報(bào)道。分析發(fā)現(xiàn):《紐約時(shí)報(bào)》在對中國的報(bào)道中存在對中國國家形象的不負(fù)責(zé)任的歪曲,并且驗(yàn)證了批評語言學(xué)的核心觀點(diǎn):語言不是中立的媒介,語言是一種社會(huì)實(shí)踐,是表達(dá)意識形態(tài)的一種手段�！都~約時(shí)報(bào)》對中國國家形象的負(fù)面報(bào)道不可避免會(huì)影響到美國及其它國家人民對中國的態(tài)度和印象,進(jìn)而損害中國在國際上的地位。通過結(jié)合意識形態(tài)對于語言的作用,本文試圖為讀者提供一種不同的分析語言的視角,即批評性閱讀方法,從而幫助讀者提高對新聞?wù)Z篇中隱含的意識形態(tài)意義... 

【文章來源】：江西師范大學(xué)江西省

【文章頁數(shù)】：79 頁

【學(xué)位級別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
Abstract
摘要
Contents
Chapter 1 Introduction
    1.1 Aim of Study
    1.2 Significances of the Study
        1.2.1 Linguistic Significance
        1.2.2 Political Significance
    1.3 Organization of the Thesis
Chapter 2 Literature Review
    2.1 Studies on News
        2.1.1 Notion of News
        2.1.2 Characteristics of New
        2.1.3 Previous Studies on News
    2.2 Studies on Critical Discourse Analysis
        2.2.1 Notion of Critical Discourse Analysis
        2.2.2 Language,Power,Ideology
        2.2.3 Development on Critical Discourse Analysis
        2.2.4 Classical Studies on Critical Discourse Analysis
        2.2.5 Studies on Critical Discourse Analysis at Home
    2.3 Summary
Chapter 3 Theoretical Framework
    3.1 Markedness Theory
    3.2 Some Related Theories of Cognitive Linguistics with Markedness Theory
        3.2.1 Metaphor
        3.2.2 Metonymy
        3.2.3 Figure-Ground
        3.2.4 Categorization
Chapter 4 Data Collection and Analysis
    4.1 Data Collection
    4.2 Analysis of Sample One
        4.2.1 Metonymy
        4.2.2 Categorization
        4.2.3.Metaphor
    4.3 Analysis of SampleTwo
        4.3.1 Figure-Ground
        4.3.2 Categorization
        4.3.3 Metonymy
    4.4 Analysis of Sample Three
        4.4.1 Metaph
        4.4.2 Nominalization
Chapter 5 Conclusions
    5.1 Summary and Discussions
    5.2 Major Findings
    5.3 Limitations of the Study
    5.4 Suggestions of Further Study
References
Appendix:News Reports for Sample Analys
    News Reports for Sample Analysis（ⅰ）
    News Reports for Sample Analysis（ⅱ）
    News Reports for Sample Analysis（Ⅲ）
Acknowledgements



本文編號：3028510