【摘要】：對(duì)比不同數(shù)據(jù)庫的結(jié)果,指出天文和物理學(xué)普遍采用的數(shù)據(jù)庫Astrophysics Data System(ADS)的優(yōu)勢(shì),并利用該數(shù)據(jù)庫進(jìn)行統(tǒng)計(jì)。通過統(tǒng)計(jì)中國(guó)主要天文期刊的施引文獻(xiàn)和參考文獻(xiàn)中國(guó)內(nèi)作者與國(guó)內(nèi)刊物貢獻(xiàn)的比例,發(fā)現(xiàn)施引文獻(xiàn)中中國(guó)作者和期刊所占比例明顯大于參考文獻(xiàn)中對(duì)應(yīng)比例。分析引用與被引不對(duì)等產(chǎn)生的原因,提出對(duì)策,建議公平、公正地對(duì)待參考文獻(xiàn)的引用,以期逐步改善。
[Abstract]:By comparing the results of different databases, this paper points out the advantages of Astrophysics Data System (ADS), which is widely used in astronomy and physics, and makes statistics by using this database. Through the statistics of the citation literature of the main astronomical journals in China and the proportion of the authors in China and the domestic publications, it is found that the proportion of the Chinese authors and periodicals in the citation literature is obviously larger than that in the references. This paper analyzes the causes of the inequality between citation and citation, puts forward some countermeasures, and suggests that the citation of references should be treated fairly and fairly, with a view to improving it step by step.
【作者單位】： 中國(guó)科學(xué)院紫金山天文臺(tái)《天文學(xué)報(bào)》編輯部;
【分類號(hào)】：G237.5;G353.1
，

本文編號(hào)：2512977