孤兒作品利用法律制度研究
[Abstract]:Orphan works refer to works that enjoy copyright, but whose rights holders cannot be found. Due to the principle of long-term automatic protection of copyright and the development of network media, a large number of orphan works appear at home and abroad, and there are many problems in practice. If the potential user is too responsible and will give up the use of orphan works, which will eventually lead to the reduction of the scale of the public domain, which is not conducive to the dissemination of knowledge. The establishment of a reasonable utilization system of orphan works will not only meet the requirements of copyright protection, but also improve the social utilization rate of knowledge products and create more value. In order to solve the problem of orphan works, the definition of "reasonable and diligent search" should be clearly defined, and the measures to solve the problem after the return of the obligee should be solved. At present, there are two main types of modes of utilization of orphan works in various countries: registration license mode and tort defense mode. However, none of them can completely solve the difficult problems of orphan works. International treaties and the domestic law of our country, the provisions on orphan works are almost blank. Therefore, this paper attempts to apply inverse encroachment to the field of intellectual property rights, and calls for the establishment of a defense theory against orphan works, which can allow potential users to use orphan works without finding the author or obligee for three years. And allow the orphan works used as a result to enter the common domain without claiming rights for ten years. This theory can solve the problem of most orphan works to a certain extent, at the same time, it will not bring about all kinds of problems such as monopoly and so on in the current solution mechanism.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:遼寧大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2012
【分類號】:D923.41
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 杜莉;;論數(shù)字圖書館建設(shè)與著作權(quán)保護(hù)[J];當(dāng)代圖書館;2003年04期
2 ;時(shí)事新聞著作權(quán)納入司法保護(hù)范圍[J];新聞實(shí)踐;2003年02期
3 江忠英;;民間文學(xué)藝術(shù)作品著作權(quán)問題研究(一)——民間文學(xué)藝術(shù)作品著作權(quán)客體范圍研究[J];電影評介;2007年04期
4 胡沐曦;;淺談數(shù)字圖書館建設(shè)中的著作權(quán)保護(hù)問題[J];科技情報(bào)開發(fā)與經(jīng)濟(jì);2007年01期
5 張力偉;;淺論民間文學(xué)藝術(shù)作品的著作權(quán)保護(hù)[J];法制與社會(huì);2008年21期
6 劉曉敏;;淺析數(shù)字圖書館的著作權(quán)保護(hù)問題[J];中小學(xué)圖書情報(bào)世界;2009年01期
7 ;關(guān)于標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的著作權(quán)保護(hù)問題研討會(huì)會(huì)議紀(jì)要[J];中國標(biāo)準(zhǔn)導(dǎo)報(bào);1996年06期
8 加連斯卡婭;馬柳春;;從國際私法觀點(diǎn)看著作權(quán)的保護(hù)問題[J];國外社會(huì)科學(xué)文摘;1986年05期
9 安德烈·弗朗松;黃貞;;法國新著作權(quán)法[J];中國出版;1987年12期
10 馬新,楊樺楠,韓建國;音像制品著作權(quán)保護(hù)應(yīng)采取的措施[J];呼蘭師專學(xué)報(bào);1995年01期
相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前10條
1 顧權(quán);王利民;;著作權(quán)保護(hù)期限的雙重構(gòu)造[A];《WTO法與中國論壇》文集——中國法學(xué)會(huì)世界貿(mào)易組織法研究會(huì)年會(huì)論文集(八)[C];2009年
2 姚蕓;潘琳;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境下的著作權(quán)糾紛法律問題探析——以博客著作權(quán)的保護(hù)為視角[A];第三屆西部律師發(fā)展論壇論文集[C];2010年
3 連毅;;淺議網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境下著作權(quán)的保護(hù)[A];第三屆西部律師發(fā)展論壇論文集[C];2010年
4 劉勇;李志江;;數(shù)字化辭書的著作權(quán)保護(hù)問題[A];中國辭書論集2000[C];2000年
5 陳華;;高校學(xué)報(bào)編輯部的法律權(quán)利與義務(wù)探析——以著作權(quán)為例[A];第11屆中國科技期刊青年編輯學(xué)術(shù)研討會(huì)暨科技期刊立體化出版模式論壇論文集[C];2011年
6 吳明秀;張煉;;淺析建筑作品的著作權(quán)保護(hù)[A];2009中華全國律師協(xié)會(huì)知識產(chǎn)權(quán)專業(yè)委員會(huì)年會(huì)暨中國律師知識產(chǎn)權(quán)高層論壇論文集(上)[C];2009年
7 趙國玲;王海濤;;著作權(quán)犯罪被害人研究[A];犯罪學(xué)論叢(第七卷)[C];2009年
8 鞏R,
本文編號:2480953
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/chubanfaxing/2480953.html