論網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供商侵犯著作權(quán)犯罪的刑法適用
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2019-04-23 23:39
【摘要】：網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供商是網(wǎng)絡(luò)虛擬社會(huì)的重要群體之一，對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)的運(yùn)營和發(fā)展起著舉足輕重的作用，是促進(jìn)當(dāng)今網(wǎng)絡(luò)技術(shù)的蓬勃發(fā)展和日益成熟的重要因素。從著作權(quán)的保護(hù)角度來講，網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供商對(duì)商業(yè)利潤的追逐，一方面使得作品的傳播途徑多元化，傳播速度日趨提升，文化產(chǎn)業(yè)市場(chǎng)得以快速拓展；但另一方面也使得著作權(quán)人對(duì)作品的控制能力減弱，成為其侵犯著作權(quán)甚至構(gòu)成侵犯著作權(quán)罪的主要誘因。在著作權(quán)侵權(quán)甚至嚴(yán)重構(gòu)成犯罪的情況在網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境中越演越烈的今天，網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供商在主觀上對(duì)侵權(quán)事實(shí)的發(fā)生存在嚴(yán)重瑕疵，具有不可推卸的責(zé)任，因此，對(duì)嚴(yán)重侵權(quán)行為可能構(gòu)成刑事犯罪并可通過刑事手段予以打擊并不存在爭(zhēng)議。而本文試圖解決的問題便是網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供商作為特殊的犯罪主體，面對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間中侵犯著作權(quán)犯罪的異化和擴(kuò)張，傳統(tǒng)刑法應(yīng)該如何正確適用。 本文分為導(dǎo)言、正文和結(jié)論三部分，其中正文部分設(shè)有四章，總體結(jié)構(gòu)上可分為三部分。 第一部分：第一章，主要闡述了網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供商的概念、范圍及分類，概括了網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供商侵犯著作權(quán)犯罪的發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀、造成的社會(huì)危害性及深層原因，并歸納了網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供商有關(guān)侵犯著作權(quán)犯罪的刑事立法現(xiàn)狀。 第二部分：包括第二章和第三章，分別針對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)內(nèi)容服務(wù)提供商（ICP）和網(wǎng)絡(luò)技術(shù)服務(wù)提供商（ISP）兩類不同的主體，從侵權(quán)法視野分析兩者的民事侵權(quán)責(zé)任的基礎(chǔ)之上，運(yùn)用傳統(tǒng)的刑法理論，特別是重點(diǎn)運(yùn)用了共同犯罪的理論，全面分析了網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供商侵犯著作權(quán)罪的刑法適用問題。關(guān)于ICP的刑事責(zé)任，，主要闡述了ICP構(gòu)成侵犯著作權(quán)罪時(shí)主觀上認(rèn)定“以營利為目的”，客觀方面確定在網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境下的定罪數(shù)額，以及不構(gòu)成共同犯罪等問題。關(guān)于ISP的刑事責(zé)任，主要闡述了ISP構(gòu)成幫助犯的認(rèn)定，重點(diǎn)分析了ISP與直接侵權(quán)著作權(quán)犯罪的實(shí)行者之間意思聯(lián)絡(luò)的片面性以及ISP客觀行為上的不作為。 第三部分：第四章，闡述了網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供商侵犯著作權(quán)犯罪的追訴困境及對(duì)策，筆者主張的觀點(diǎn)主要包括：一是建議將ISP的幫助犯性質(zhì)通過立法進(jìn)行正犯化，二是建議將侵犯著作權(quán)罪的“以營利為目的”的主觀條件取消，三是建議將侵犯著作權(quán)罪的定罪情節(jié)在網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境中的擴(kuò)張化。
[Abstract]:Network service provider is one of the most important groups in the network virtual society. It plays an important role in the operation and development of the network and is an important factor to promote the vigorous development and maturity of the network technology. From the point of view of copyright protection, the pursuit of commercial profits by network service providers, on the one hand, makes the spread of works diversified, the speed of dissemination is increasing day by day, and the market of cultural industry can be expanded rapidly; But on the other hand, the copyright owner's ability to control the works is weakened, which becomes the main inducement of the infringement of copyright and even constitutes the crime of infringing copyright. Today, when copyright infringement or even serious crime is becoming more and more serious in the network environment, Internet service providers have serious defects in the subjective occurrence of infringement facts and have responsibilities that cannot be shirked. There is no dispute that serious infringement may constitute a criminal offence and can be dealt with by criminal means. The problem that this paper tries to solve is how to correctly apply the traditional criminal law to the alienation and expansion of the crime of infringing copyright in cyberspace, as a special subject of crime. This paper is divided into three parts: introduction, text and conclusion, in which the main body consists of four chapters, the overall structure can be divided into three parts. The first part: the first chapter mainly expounds the concept, scope and classification of the network service provider, summarizes the current situation of the development of the crime of infringing copyright by the network service provider, and the social harmfulness and the deep cause of the crime. And summarized the network service provider related to copyright infringement crime of criminal legislation status. The second part includes chapter two and chapter three, aiming at the two different kinds of subjects, (ICP) and (ISP), respectively, on the basis of analyzing the tort liability of the two groups from the perspective of tort law. By using the traditional theory of criminal law, especially the theory of joint crime, this paper analyzes comprehensively the application of criminal law to the crime of infringing copyright by the network service provider. With regard to the criminal liability of ICP, this paper mainly expounds the subjective determination of "profit-making purpose" when ICP constitutes a crime of infringing copyright, the objective determination of the amount of conviction in the network environment, and the problem that ICP does not constitute a joint crime and so on. With regard to the criminal liability of ISP, this paper mainly expounds the cognizance of ISP as a crime of help, and emphatically analyzes the one-sidedness of the relationship between ISP and the implementers of direct infringement of copyright, as well as the omission in the objective act of ISP. The third part: the fourth chapter, elaborated the network service provider infringes the copyright crime the prosecution predicament and the countermeasure, the author advocates the viewpoint mainly includes: first, the suggestion carries on the legalization through the legislation to the help crime nature of the ISP, Secondly, it is suggested that the subjective condition of "profit-making" for copyright infringement should be abolished, and that the criminalization circumstances of copyright infringement should be expanded in the network environment.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D923.41
本文編號(hào)：2463909
[Abstract]:Network service provider is one of the most important groups in the network virtual society. It plays an important role in the operation and development of the network and is an important factor to promote the vigorous development and maturity of the network technology. From the point of view of copyright protection, the pursuit of commercial profits by network service providers, on the one hand, makes the spread of works diversified, the speed of dissemination is increasing day by day, and the market of cultural industry can be expanded rapidly; But on the other hand, the copyright owner's ability to control the works is weakened, which becomes the main inducement of the infringement of copyright and even constitutes the crime of infringing copyright. Today, when copyright infringement or even serious crime is becoming more and more serious in the network environment, Internet service providers have serious defects in the subjective occurrence of infringement facts and have responsibilities that cannot be shirked. There is no dispute that serious infringement may constitute a criminal offence and can be dealt with by criminal means. The problem that this paper tries to solve is how to correctly apply the traditional criminal law to the alienation and expansion of the crime of infringing copyright in cyberspace, as a special subject of crime. This paper is divided into three parts: introduction, text and conclusion, in which the main body consists of four chapters, the overall structure can be divided into three parts. The first part: the first chapter mainly expounds the concept, scope and classification of the network service provider, summarizes the current situation of the development of the crime of infringing copyright by the network service provider, and the social harmfulness and the deep cause of the crime. And summarized the network service provider related to copyright infringement crime of criminal legislation status. The second part includes chapter two and chapter three, aiming at the two different kinds of subjects, (ICP) and (ISP), respectively, on the basis of analyzing the tort liability of the two groups from the perspective of tort law. By using the traditional theory of criminal law, especially the theory of joint crime, this paper analyzes comprehensively the application of criminal law to the crime of infringing copyright by the network service provider. With regard to the criminal liability of ICP, this paper mainly expounds the subjective determination of "profit-making purpose" when ICP constitutes a crime of infringing copyright, the objective determination of the amount of conviction in the network environment, and the problem that ICP does not constitute a joint crime and so on. With regard to the criminal liability of ISP, this paper mainly expounds the cognizance of ISP as a crime of help, and emphatically analyzes the one-sidedness of the relationship between ISP and the implementers of direct infringement of copyright, as well as the omission in the objective act of ISP. The third part: the fourth chapter, elaborated the network service provider infringes the copyright crime the prosecution predicament and the countermeasure, the author advocates the viewpoint mainly includes: first, the suggestion carries on the legalization through the legislation to the help crime nature of the ISP, Secondly, it is suggested that the subjective condition of "profit-making" for copyright infringement should be abolished, and that the criminalization circumstances of copyright infringement should be expanded in the network environment.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D923.41
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 彭文華;網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)商之刑事責(zé)任探討[J];佛山科學(xué)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2004年03期
2 陳興良;“應(yīng)當(dāng)知道”的刑法界說[J];法學(xué);2005年07期
3 郭丹;高立忠;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的刑事法保護(hù)[J];甘肅政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年03期
4 于志剛;;侵犯著作權(quán)罪中“以營利為目的”的網(wǎng)絡(luò)異化——以珊瑚蟲QQ案為視角[J];昆明理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年07期
5 李娜;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)商(ISP)刑事責(zé)任的解構(gòu)[J];理論月刊;2011年06期
6 郝方f ;;關(guān)于構(gòu)成侵犯著作權(quán)罪應(yīng)否需要“以營利為目的”的理性思考——兼評(píng)《關(guān)于辦理侵犯知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)刑事案件適用法律若干問題的意見》中的相關(guān)規(guī)定[J];西南科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年05期
7 張雨林;許紅纓;;ICP上載作品的著作權(quán)思考[J];信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)安全;2006年03期
8 黃斯蓓;張敏;;侵犯著作權(quán)犯罪中“以營利為目的”問題研究[J];南京醫(yī)科大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年04期
9 趙秉志,張新平;試論網(wǎng)絡(luò)共同犯罪[J];政法論壇;2002年05期
10 崔立紅 ,秦野;網(wǎng)絡(luò)時(shí)代知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)犯罪問題研究及其對(duì)策[J];知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2001年04期
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前6條
1 車巖;不作為幫助犯研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2011年
2 楚武龍;在線影視盜版的刑法規(guī)制[D];中國政法大學(xué);2011年
3 盛文超;毒品犯罪主觀故意認(rèn)定問題研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2009年
4 李彥宏;BT下載的刑法規(guī)制[D];中國政法大學(xué);2010年
5 于耀輝;網(wǎng)絡(luò)搜索服務(wù)提供商侵犯著作權(quán)的刑事責(zé)任[D];中國政法大學(xué);2010年
6 李晨曦;犯罪故意明知問題研究[D];鄭州大學(xué);2010年
本文編號(hào)：2463909
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/chubanfaxing/2463909.html
最近更新
教材專著
